Aversive democracy: Inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition

Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-238

  Norval, Aletta J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928297518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490316     Document Type: Book

References (259)

1. Abizadeh, A., ‘Banishing the particular. Rousseau on rhetoric, patrie, and the passions’, Political Theory 29, no. 4 (2001), 556–82.
2. Ackerman, B. and J. S. Fishkin, ‘Deliberation day’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 129–52.
3. Akkerman, T., ‘Urban debates and deliberative democracy’, Acta Politika 1 (2001), 71–87.
4. Aronovitch, H., ‘The political importance of analogical argument’, Political Studies 45 (1997), 78–92.
5. Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, ed. J. O. Urmson, and M. Sbisà (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
6. Badiou, A., Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Peter Hallward (London: Verso, 2001).
7. Baker, G. P. and P. M. S. Hacker, Wittgenstein. Meaning and Understanding, Essays on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. i (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).
8. Balibar, E., ‘Ambiguous universality’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 7, no. 1 (1995), 48–74.
9. Barber, B. R., Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).
10. Barber, B. R., ‘Foundationalism and democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 348–59.
11. Basu, A., ‘Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 4 (1999), 378–403.
12. Barthes, R., S/Z, trans. R. Millar (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974).
13. Baz, A., ‘What’s the point of seeing aspects?’, Philosophical Investigations 23, no. 2 (2000), 97–121.
14. Bender, J. and D. E. Wellbery, ‘Rhetoricality: On the modernist return of rhetoric’, in J. Bender and D. E. Wellbery (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory, Practice (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 3–39.
15. Benhabib, S., ‘The democratic moment and the problem of difference’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 3–18.
16. Benhabib, S., ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 67–94.
17. Benhabib, S., ‘Liberal dialogue versus a critical theory of discursive legitimation’, in N. L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 143–56.
18. Bernstein, R. J., The New Constellation. The Ethical–Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).
19. Bernstein, R. J., ‘“Laws, morals, and ethics”: The retrieval of the democratic ethos’, Cardozo Law Review 17 (1996), 1127–46.
20. Blaug, R., ‘New theories of discursive democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, no. 1 (1996), 49–80.
21. Bohman, J., ‘Emancipation and rhetoric: The perlocutions and illocutions of the social critic’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 21, no. 3 (1988), 185–204.
22. Bohman, J., ‘Critical theory and democracy’, in D. M. Rasmussen (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 190–215.
23. Bohman, J., Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996).
24. Bohman, J., ‘Two versions of the linguistic turn: Habermas and poststructuralism’, in M. Passerin D’Entrèves and S. Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 197–220.
25. Bohman, J., ‘“When water chokes”: Ideology, communication, and practical rationality’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 382–92.
26. Borradori, G., Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
27. Boraine, A., ‘Truth and reconciliation in South Africa’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 141–57.
28. Bouveresse, J., Wittgenstein Reads Freud, trans. C. Cosman (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).
29. Brennan, W. J., ‘Reason, passion and “the progress of the law”’, Cardozo Law Review 10 (1988), 3–23.
30. Brockelman, T., ‘The failure of the radical democratic imaginary: Žižek versus Laclau and Mouffe on vestigial utopia’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003), 183–208.
31. Butler, J., ‘Critically queer’, in J. Butler, Bodies that Matter (London: Routledge, 1993).
32. Butler, J. and E. Laclau, ‘The uses of equality’, diacritics 27, no. 1 (1995), 3–19.
33. Butler, J., E. Laclau and S. Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).
34. Caputo, J. D., ‘Without sovereignty, without being: Unconditionality, the coming God and Derrida’s democracy to come’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 4 (2003), 9–26.
35. Cavell, S., Must We Mean What We Say? (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976).
36. Cavell, S., The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).
37. Cavell, S., This New Yet Unapproachable America (Alburquerque, N. Mex.: Living Batch Press, 1989).
38. Cavell, S., Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism, The Carus Lectures, 1988 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).
39. Cavell, S., ‘What is the Emersonian event? A comment on Kateb’s Emerson’, New Literary History, 25 (1994), 951–8.
40. Cavell, S., Cities of Words. Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004).
41. Cavell, S., Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005).
42. Cavell, S. ‘The incessance and absence of the political’, in A. Norris (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 263–317.
43. Chambers, S. A., ‘The language of disagreement’. Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the Disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the Political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
44. Chambers, S. A., ‘The politics of literality’ (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/toc/archive.html#8.3).
45. Chambers, S., Reasonable Democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (London: Cornell University Press, 1996).
46. Churchill, J., ‘Rat and mole’s epiphany of Pan: Wittgenstein on seeing aspects and religious belief’, Philosophical Investigations 21, no. 4 (1998), 152–72.
47. Cohen, J., ‘Democracy and liberty’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 185–231.
48. Coles, R., ‘Of democracy, discourse, and dirt virtue’, Political Theory 28 (2000), 540–64.
49. Conant, J., ‘Nietzsche’s perfectionism: A reading of Schopenhauer as Educator’, in R. Schacht (ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 181–257.
50. Connolly, W. E., Identity\Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).
51. Connolly, W. E., ‘Democracy and contingency’, in J. H. Carens (ed.), Democracy and Possessive Individualism. The Intellectual Legacy of C. B. Macpherson (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 193–219.
52. Connolly, W. E., The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).
53. Connolly, W. E., ‘Twilight of the idols’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (1995), 127–37.
54. Connolly, W. E., ‘Speed, concentric cultures, and cosmopolitanism’, Political Theory 28, no. 5 (2000), 596–618.
55. Coombes, A. E., History after Apartheid. Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003).
56. Copi, I. M. and C. Cohen, Introduction to Logic, 9th edn (New York: Macmillan, 1994).
57. Cornell, D., ‘“Convention” and critique’, Cardozo Law Review 7 (1986), 679–91.
58. Critchley, S., The Ethics of Deconstruction. Derrida and Levinas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
59. Critchley, S. and O. Marchart (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004).
60. Crusius, T. W., ‘Foreword’, in E. Grassi, Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001), pp. xi–xviii.
61. Dallmayer, F. R., ‘Critical theory criticized’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (1972), 211–29.
62. Dallmayr, F., ‘Laclau and hegemony: Some (post) Hegelian caveats’, in S. Critchley and O. Marchart (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 35–53.
63. Deranty, J.-P, ‘Jacques Rancière’s contribution to the ethics of recognition’, Political Theory, 31, no. 1 (2003), 136–56.
64. Derrida, J., Speech and Phenomena, trans. D. B. Allison (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973).
65. Derrida, J., Of Grammatology, trans. G. Spivak (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).
66. Derrida, J., Limited Inc. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1988).
67. Derrida, J., ‘Politics and friendship. A discussion with Jacques Derrida’, Centre for Modern French Thought, University of Sussex, 1 December 1997. At (www.hydra.umn.edu/derrida/pol+fr.html).
68. Derrida, J., Politics of Friendship, trans. George Collins (London: Verso, 1997).
69. Derrida, J., Rogues. Two Essays on Reason, trans. P.-A. Brault and M. Naas (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005).
70. Dodds, E. R., Plato, Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).
71. Dronsfield, J. and N. Midgley (eds.), Responsibilities of Deconstruction (PLI, Warwick Journal of Philosophy 6, University of Warwick, 1997).
72. Dryzek, J. S., ‘Political and ecological communication’, Environmental Politics 4 (1995), 10–30.
73. Dryzek, J. S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
74. Du Bois, F., ‘“Nothing but the truth”: The South African alternative to corrective justice in transitions to democracy’, in E. Christodoulidis and S. Veitch (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 91–114.
75. Du Toit, A., ‘The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 122–40.
76. Dyzenhaus, D., Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves. Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).
77. Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Survey article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000), 470–96.
78. Edwards, J. C., Ethics without Philosophy. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life (Tampa: University Presses of South Florida, 1985).
79. Elster, J., ‘Introduction’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 1–18.
80. Fann, K. T., Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).
81. Fearon, J., ‘Deliberation as discussion’, in John Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 44–68.
82. Ferrara, A., ‘The communicative paradigm in moral theory’, in D. M. Rasmussen (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 119–37.
83. Fishkin, J. S., and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2003).
84. Flyvberg, B., ‘Ideal theory, real rationality: Habermas versus Foucault and Nietzsche’, Paper presented to the Political Studies Association’s 50th Annual Conference, ‘The Challenges for Democracy in the 21st Century’, London School of Economics and Political Science, 10–13 April 2000, 6–7.
85. Fontana, B., C. J. Nederman, and G. Remer, ‘Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn’, in B. Fontana, C. J. Nederman and G. Remer (eds.), Talking Democracy. Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004), pp. 1–25.
86. Forester, J., The Deliberative Practitioner (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999).
87. Fraser, N., ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to a critique of actually existing democracy’, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 109–42.
88. Fraser, N., and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? (London: Verso, 2003).
89. Freeden, M., Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).
90. Gasché, R., The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).
91. Gasché, R., ‘“In the name of reason”: The deconstruction of sovereignty’, Research in Phenomenology 34, no. 1 (2004), 289–303.
92. Glock, H.-J., A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).
93. Glynos, J., ‘Theory and evidence in the Freudian field: from observation to structure’, in L. J. Glynos and Y. Stavrakakis (eds.), Lacan and Science (London: Karnac Press, 2002), pp. 13–50.
94. Glynos, J. and D. Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2007).
95. Godby, M., ‘Memory and history in William Kentridge’s History of the Main Complaint’, in S. Nuttall and C. Coetzee (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 100–11.
96. Goodin, R. E., Reflective Democracy, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
97. Grassi, E., Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001).
98. Griggs, S. and D. Howarth, ‘Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign in the United Kingdom’ (www.essex.ac.uk/centres/TheoStud/onlinepapers.asp).
99. Gutman A. and D. Thompson, ‘The moral foundations of truth commissions’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 22–44.
100. Habermas, J., ‘A reply to my critics’, in J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 219–83.
101. Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann, 1976).
102. Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997).
103. Hacker, P. M. S., Insight and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).
104. Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part 1: Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
105. Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein on Human Nature (London: Phoenix Paperback, 1997).
106. Hacking, I., ‘Language, truth, reason’, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 48–66.
107. Hacking, I., ‘Styles of scientific reasoning’, in J. Rajchman and C. West (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press: 1985), pp. 145–65.
108. Hadad, S., ‘Derrida and democracy at risk’, Contretemps 4 (2004), 29–44.
109. Hall, C., ‘“Passion and constraint”: The marginalization of passion in liberal political theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28, no. 6 (2002), 727–48.
110. Hammer, E., Stanley Cavell. Skepticism, Subjectivity and the Ordinary (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).
111. Hampshire, S., Justice is Conflict (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
112. Harrison, B., ‘White mythology revisited: Derrida and his critics on reason and rhetoric’, Critical Inquiry 25 (1999), 505–34.
113. Hayner, P. B., ‘Fifteen truth commissions – 1974 to 1994: A comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994), 597–655.
114. Helsloot, N., ‘Linguists of all countries…!’, Journal of Pragmatics 13 (1989), 547–66.
115. Herwitz, D., ‘The future of the past in South Africa: On the legacy of the TRC’, Social Research 72 (2005), 531–48.
116. Hesse, M., ‘Habermas and the force of dialectical argument’, History of European Ideas 21, no. 3 (1995), 367–78.
117. Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N.J.: Cornell University Press, 2003).
118. Honig, B., Democracy and the Foreigner (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).
119. Honig, B., ‘The time of rights’, keynote address, Sixth Essex Graduate Conference in Political Theory, 13–14th May 2005.
120. Houghton, D., The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations, Cambridge Studies in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
121. Howarth, D., ‘Ideology, hegemony and political subjectivity’, in I. Hampsher-Monk and J. Stanyer (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1996, vol. ii (Oxford: Political Studies Association of the UK, 1996), pp. 944–56.
122. Howarth, D., ‘Complexities of identity/difference: the ideology of black consciousness in South Africa’, Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 1 (1997), 51–78.
123. Howarth, D., ‘Paradigms gained? A critique of theories and explanations of democratic transition in South Africa’, in D. R. Howarth and A. J. Norval, South Africa in Transition (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 182–214.
124. Howarth, D., Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000).
125. Jonsen, A. R. and S. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).
126. Kahn, P. W., Putting Liberalism in its Place (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005).
127. Keenan, A., Democracy in Question. Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003).
128. Kiss, E., ‘Moral ambition within and beyond political constraints: Reflections on restorative justice’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 68–98.
129. Knight, J. and J. Johnson, ‘What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require?’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1997), pp. 279–320.
130. Kohn, M., ‘Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 408–29.
131. Krog, K., ‘The TRC and national unity’, in R. Dorsman, H. Hartman and L. Notenboom-Kronemeijer (eds.), Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa and the Netherlands (Utrecht: SMI Special No. 23, 1999), pp. 14–31.
132. Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).
133. Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985).
134. Laclau, E., New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990).
135. Laclau, E., ‘Universalism, particularism and the question of identity’, in E. Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), pp. 20–35.
136. Laclau, E., ‘Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony’, in S. Critchley, J. Derrida, E. Laclau and R. Rorty, Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. C. Mouffe (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 47–68.
137. Laclau, E., ‘Paul de Man and the politics of rhetoric’, Pretexts 7, no. 2 (1998), 153–70.
138. Laclau, E., ‘Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics’, in J. Butler, E. Laclau and S. Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).
139. Laclau, E., ‘Structure, history and the political’, in J. Butler, E. Laclau and S. Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 182–212.
140. Laclau, E., ‘Glimpsing the future: A reply’, in Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 279–328.
141. Laclau, E., On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005).
142. Laden, A. S., Reasonably Radical. Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001).
143. Lefort, C., The Political Forms of Modern Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1986).
144. Lefort, C., Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).
145. Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).
146. Lueken, G.-L., ‘On showing in argumentation’, Philosophical Investigations 20, no. 3 (1997), 205–23.
147. Lukes, S., ‘Of gods and demons: Habermas and practical reason’, in J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 134–48.
148. Luntley, M., Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003).
149. Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
150. Majone, G., Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989).
151. Marcus, G., The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).
152. McCarthy, T. and S. C. Studd (eds.), Wittgenstein in America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).
153. McFee, G., ‘Wittgenstein on art and aspects’, Philosophical Investigations 22, no. 3 (1999), 262–84.
154. Meehan, J., ‘Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 3 (2000), 39–52.
155. Meintjies, S. and B. Goldblatt, ‘Gender and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, May 1996 (www.truth.org.za/submit/gender.htm).
156. Mendus, S., Feminism and Emotion. Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000).
157. Miller, D., ‘Deliberative democracy and social choice’, in D. Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy. North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 74–92.
158. Miller, D., ‘Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups’, in M. Passerin D’Entrèves (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), pp. 201–25.
159. Minow, M., ‘The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do?’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 235–60.
160. Mouffe, C. (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979).
161. Mouffe, C. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso, 1992).
162. Mouffe, C., The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993).
163. Mouffe, C., ‘Democratic politics and the question of identity’, in J. Rajchman (ed.), The Identity in Question (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 33–45.
164. Mouffe, C., ‘Politics, democratic action, and solidarity’, Inquiry 39 (1995), 99–108.
165. Mouffe, C., The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000).
166. Mouffe, C., ‘Politics and Passion: The stakes of democracy’, Centre for the Study of Democracy Perspectives, 2002.
167. Mulhall, S., On Being in the World. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects (London: Routledge, 1990).
168. Mulhall, S., Stanley Cavell. Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
169. Mulhall, S., ‘Promising, consent, and citizenship: Rawls and Cavell on morality and politics’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 171–92.
170. Mulhall, S., Inheritance and Originality. Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).
171. Ndebele, N., ‘Memory, metaphor, and the triumph of narrative’, in S. Nuttall and C. Coetzee (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 19–28.
172. Nietzsche, F., ‘Schopenhauer as Educator’, in O. Levy (ed.), The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, vol. ii, Thoughts Out of Season, Part Two (London: T.N. Foulis, 1909).
173. Nietzsche, F., ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense (1873)’, in K. Ansell Pearson and D. Large (eds.), The Nietzsche Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), pp. 114–23.
174. Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, Political Theory 30 (2002), 828–32.
175. Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, in A. Norris (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 80–97.
176. Norval, A. J., ‘Frontiers in question’, Acta Philosophica 2 (1997), 51–76.
177. Norval, A. J., ‘Memory, identity and the (im)possibility of reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa’, Constellations 5 (1998), 250–61.
178. Norval, A. J., ‘Future trajectories of research in discourse theory’, in D. Howarth, A. J. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), pp. 219–36.
179. Norval, A. J., ‘Radical democracy’, in J. Foweraker and B. Clarke (eds.), Dictionary of Democratic Thought (London: Routledge, 2001).
180. Norval, A. J., ‘Reconstructing national identity and renegotiating memory: the work of the TRC’, in T. Blom Hansen and F. Stepputat (eds.), States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 182–202.
181. Norval, A. J., ‘Hegemony after deconstruction: The consequences of undecidability’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 2 (2004), 139–57.
182. Norval, A. J., ‘Democratic identification: A Wittgensteinian approach’, Political Theory 34 (2006), 229–55.
183. O’Neill, M., ‘Explaining “the hardness of the logical must”: Wittgenstein on grammar, arbitrariness and logical necessity’, Philosophical Investigations 24, no. 1 (2001), 1–29.
184. O’Neill, O., Towards Virtue and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
185. O’Neill, O., ‘Political liberalism and public reason: A critical notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, The Philosophical Review 106, no. 3 (1997), 417.
186. O’Neill, O., Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
187. Outhwaite, W., Habermas. A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).
188. Owen, D., ‘Cultural diversity and the conversation of justice’, Political Theory 27, no. 5 (1999), 579–96.
189. Owen, D., ‘Democracy, perfectionism and “undetermined messianic hope”’, in C. Mouffe and L. Nagl (eds.), The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism and Deconstruction (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001), pp. 139–56.
190. Owen, D., ‘Genealogy as perspicuous representation’, in C. J. Heyes (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (London: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 82–96.
191. Owen, D., ‘Perfectionism, parrhesia and the care of the self: Foucault and Cavell on ethics and politics’, in A. Norris (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 128–55.
192. Panagia, D., ‘The predicative function in ideology: On the political uses of analogical reasoning in contemporary political thought’, Journal of Political Ideologies 6, no. 1 (2001), 55–74.
193. Panagia, D., ‘The force of political argument’, Political Theory 32, no. 6 (2004), 825–48.
194. Passerin D’Entrèves, M. (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).
195. Pelletier, D., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo and R. Rich, ‘The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical case study from New York’s North County’, Policy Sciences 32 (1999), 103–31.
196. Pohlhaus, G. and J.R. Wright, ‘Using Wittgenstein critically’, Political Theory 30, no. 6 (2002), 800–27.
197. Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).
198. Rancière, J., The Names of History, trans. H. Melehy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).
199. Rancière, J., ‘Post-democracy, politics and philosophy’, interview with J. Sumicˇ and R. Riha, in D. Howarth and A. J. Norval (eds.), Reconsidering the Political, special issue of Angelaki (1994), 171–8.
200. Rancière, J., On the Shores of Politics, trans. Liz Heron (London: Verso, 1995).
201. Rancière, J., Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).
202. Rancière, J., ‘Ten theses on politics’, Theory and Event, trans. Davide Panagia, 5, no. 3 (2001) (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html).
203. Rancière, J., The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible, trans. Gabriel Rockhill (London: Continuum, 2004).
204. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).
205. Rehg, W., ‘Translator’s introduction’, in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. ix–xxxvii.
206. Renn, O., T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).
207. Ross, F. C., ‘On having voice and being heard: Some after–effects of testifying before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Anthropological Theory 30 (2003), 325–41.
208. Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract (London: Penguin Classics, 1968).
209. Sanders, L. M., ‘Against deliberation’, Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997), 347–76.
210. Scheuerman, W. E., ‘Between radicalism and resignation: Democratic theory in Habermas in Between Facts and Norms’, in P. Dews (ed.), Habermas. A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153–77.
211. Shapiro, M. J., ‘Radicalizing democratic theory: Social space in Connolly, Deleuze and Rancière’, Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages. gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
212. Shusterman, R., ‘Putnam and Cavell on the ethics of democracy’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 193–214.
213. Skinner, Q., Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
214. Sparti, D., ‘Responsiveness as responsibility: Cavell’s reading of Wittgenstein and King Lear as a source for an ethics of interpersonal relationships’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2000), 81–107.
215. Stoker, G. Why Politics Matters. Making Democracy Work (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).
216. Sumič, J., ‘Anachronism of emancipation or fidelity to politics’, in S. Critchley and O. Marchart (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 182–98.
217. Sunstein, C., ‘The law of group polarization’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 175–95.
218. Thomson, A. J. P., Deconstruction and Democracy, Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy (London: Continuum, 2005).
219. Thomson, A. J. P., ‘What’s to become of “democracy to come”?’, Postmodern Culture 15 (2005) (http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/postmodern_culture/v015/15.3thomson.html).
220. Todorov, T., Theories of the Symbol, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).
221. Toulmin, S., Return to Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001).
222. Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: understanding practices of critical reflection’, Political Theory 17, no. 2 (1989), 172–204.
223. Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
224. Tully, J., ‘Political philosophy as a critical activity’, Political Theory 30, no. 4 (2002), 533–55.
225. Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: Understanding practices of critical reflection’, in C. J. Heyes (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 17–42.
226. Veitch, S., ‘The legal politics of amnesty’, in E. Christodoulidis and S. Veitch (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 32–45.
227. Vickers, B., In Defence of Rhetoric (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
228. Villa-Vicencio C. and W. Verwoerd, ‘Constructing a report: Writing up the “truth”’, in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 279–94.
229. Waldron, J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
230. Walker, B., ‘Thoreau on democratic cultivation’, Political Theory 29 (2001), 155–89.
231. Walzer, M., ‘A critique of philosophical conversation’, The Philosophical Forum 21, no. 1–2 (1989–90), 182–96.
232. Walzer, M., Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).
233. Walzer, M., Politics and Passion. Towards a More Egalitarian Liberalism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2004).
234. Ward, H., A. J. Norval, T. Landman and J. Pretty, ‘Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability’, Political Studies, 51 (2003), 282–99.
235. Warren, M., ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86, no. 1 (1992), 8–23.
236. Warren, M., ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in Stephen White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167–200.
237. Warren, M. ‘What can democratic participation mean today?’, Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002), 677–701.
238. Warren, M. E., ‘What should and should not be said: Deliberating sensitive issues’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 2 (2006), 163–81.
239. Weeks, E. C., ‘The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials’, Public Administration Review 60, no. 4 (2000), 360–72.
240. White, S. K., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
241. White, S., Political Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
242. White, S., ‘After Critique: Affirming subjectivity in contemporary political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 2 (2003), 209–26.
243. Widder, N., Genealogies of Difference (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 2002).
244. Wiley, J., ‘Review essay: The impasse of radical democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2002), 483–8.
245. Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty, ed. G. E.MAnscombe and G. H. von Wright, trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).
246. Wittgenstein, L., Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–35, ed. A. Ambrose (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).
247. Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (1958; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).
248. Wittgenstein, L., Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Cyril Barrett (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).
249. Wollstonecraft, M., Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. with introduction M. Brody (London: Penguin Books, 1983).
250. Wood, D., ‘The experience of the ethical’, in R. Kearney and M. Dooley (eds.), Questioning Ethics. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 105–19.
251. Young, I. M., ‘Difference as resource for democratic communication’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 383–406.
252. Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘“This universalism which is not one”: A review of Ernesto Laclau’s Emancipation(s)’, Diacritics 28, no. 2 (1998), 3–20.
253. Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘Doing without knowing: Feminisms’ politics of the ordinary’, Political Theory 26, no. 4 (1998), 434–58.
254. Zerilli, L. M. G., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).
255. Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘“We feel our freedom”: Imagination and judgment in the thought of Hannah Arendt’, Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005), 158–88.
256. Žižek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989).
257. Žižek, S., For They Know Not What They Do. Enjoyment as a Political Factor (London: Verso, 1991).
258. Žižek, S., The Ticklish Subject (London: Verso, 1999).
259. Žižek, S., ‘Melancholy and the act’, Critical Inquiry 26 (2000), 657–81.