Frequency of aneuploidy in in vitro-matured MII oocytes and corresponding first polar bodies in two dairy cattle (Bos taurus) breeds as determined by dual-color fluorescent in situ hybridization

Theriogenology

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 523-529

  Nicodemo, D ^a   Pauciullo, A ^a   Cosenza, G ^a   Peretti, V ^a   Perucatti, A ^b   Di Meo, G P ^b   Ramunno, L ^a   Iannuzzi, L ^b   Rubes, J ^c   Di Berardino, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Bovine oocytes; Cattle breeds; Diploidy; FISH analysis; Polar bodies

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHROMOSOME; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETICS; MEIOSIS; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHROMOSOMES; FEMALE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MEIOSIS; OOCYTES;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOS TAURUS; BOVINAE; FRIESIA;

EID: 75149161484     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. King W.A., Xu K.P., Sirard M.A., Greve T., Leclerc P., Lambert R.D., and Jacques P. Cytogenetic study of parthenogenetically activated bovine oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. Gamete Res 20 (1988) 265-274
2. Suss U., Wuthrich K., and Stranzinger G. Chromosome configuration and time sequence of the first meiotic division in bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod 38 (1988) 871-880
3. Ectors F.J., Konlischer L., Jamar M., Herens C., Verloes A., Remy B., and Beckers J.F. Cytogenetic study of bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 44 (1995) 445-450
4. Sosnowski J., Switonski M., Lechniak D., and Molinski K. Cytogenetic evaluation of in vitro matured bovine oocytes collected from ovaries of individual donors. Theriogenology 45 (1996) 865-872
5. Lechniak D., Switonski M., and Sosnowski J. The incidence of bovine diploiid oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 46 (1996) 267-277
6. Ocana-Quero J.M., Pinedo-Merlin M., and Moreno-Millan M. Influence of follicle size, medium, temperature and time on the incidence of diploid bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 51 (1999) 867-872
7. Lechniak D., Kaczmarek D., Stanislavski D., and Adamowicz T. The ploidy of in vitro matured bovine oocytes is related to the diameter. Theriogenology 57 (2002) 1303-1308
8. Yadav B., King W., Xu K., Pollard J., and Plante L. Chromosome analysis of bovine oocytes cultured in vitro. Genet Sel Evol 23 (1991) 191-196
9. Lechniak D., and Switonski M. Aneuploidy in bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Chromosome Res 6 (1998) 504-1504
10. Tarkowski A.K. An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5 (1966) 394-400
11. Langer P.R., Waldrop A.A., and Ward D.C. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labelled polynucleotides: novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78 (1981) 6633-6637
12. Pellestor F., Girardet A., Andréo B., and Charlieu J.P. A polymorphic alpha satellite sequence specific for human chromosome 13 detected by oligonucleotide primed in situ labelling (PRINS). Hum Genet 94 (1994) 346-348
13. Nicodemo D, Pauciullo A, Castello A, Roldan E, Gomendio M, Cosenza G, et al. X-Y sperm aneuploidy in two cattle (Bos taurus) breeds as determined by dual colour fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Cytogenet Genome Res 2009;126: doi:10.1159/000245923, in press.
14. Iannuzzi L., and Di Berardino D. Tools of the trade: diagnostic and research applied to domestic animal cytogenetics. J Appl Genet 49 (2008) 357-366
15. Engelen J.J., Albrechts J.C., Hamers G.J., and Geraedts J.P. A simple and efficient method for microdissection and microFISH. J Med Genet 35 (1998) 265-268
16. Kuliev A., Cieslak J., and Verlinskly Y. Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 111 (2005) 193-198
17. Pacchierotti F., Adler I., Eichenlaub-ritter U., and Mailhes J.B. Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells. Environ Res 104 (2007) 46-69
18. Vozdová M., Machatková M., Kubiková S., Zudová D., Jokesová E., and Rubes J. Frequency of aneuploidy in pig oocytes matured in vitro and of the corresponding first polar bodies detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Theriogenology 56 (2001) 771-776
19. Mcgaughey R.W., and Polge C. Cytogenetic analysis of pig oocytes matured in vitro. J Exp Zool 176 (1971) 383-395
20. Sosnowski J., Waroczyk M., and Switonski M. Chromosome abnormalities in secondary pig oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 60 (2003) 571-581
21. A' Arabi S.Y., Roussel J.D., and Chandler J.E. Chromosomal analysis of mammalian oocytes matured in vitro with various culture systems. Theriogenology 48 (1997) 1173-1183
22. King W.A. Chromosome variation in the embryos of domestic animals. Cytogenet Genome Res 120 (2008) 81-90
23. Lonergan P. State-of-the-art embryo technologies in cattle. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64 (2007) 315-325
24. Hecht F., and Hecht B.K. Environmental chromosome damage. Am J Med Genet 27 (1987) 399-400
25. Martin H.R., Ko E., and Rademaker A. Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between human sperm and oocytes. Am J Med Genet 39 (1991) 321-331
26. Pellestor F. The cytogenetic analysis of human zygotes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod Update 1 (1995) 581-585
27. Hassold T.J. Nondisjunction in the human male. In: Handel M.A. (Ed). Meiosis and Gametogenesis (1998), Academic Press 383-406
28. King W.A. Chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy failure in domestic animals. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 23 (1990) 229-250
29. Kawarski S.J., Basrur P.K., Stubbings R.B., Hansen P.J., and King W.A. Chromosomal abnormalities in bovine embryos and their influence on development. Biol Reprod 54 (1996) 53-59
30. Vanroose G., de Kruif A., and Van Soom A. Embryonic mortality and embryo-pathogen interactions. Anim Reprod Sci 60-61 (2000) 131-143
31. Maihes J.B., and Marchetti F. Mechanisms and chemical induction of aneuploidy in rodent germ cells. Cytogenet Genome Res 111 (2005) 384-391