The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1049, Issue , 2005, Pages 161-171

  Vodička, Petr ^a,b   Smetana Jr , Karel ^b,c   Dvořánková, Barbora ^b,c   Emerick, Teresa ^d   Xu, Yingzhi Z ^d   Ourednik, Jitka ^d   Ourednik, Václav ^d   Motlík, Jan ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Stem cell; Transgenic pig; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY; ANIMAL MODEL; BIOMEDICINE; BREEDING METHOD; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTATION; FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MINIPIG; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; REPRODUCTION; SKIN DEFECT; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TRANSGENE; XENOTRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; PRIMATES; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 22044439316     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1334.015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. ROTHSCHILD, M.F. & A. RUVINSKY. 1998. Genetics of the Pig. CAB International. Wallingford, UK.
2. HASSOLD, T. & P. HUNT. 2001. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 280-291.
3. ELLEDEROVÁ, Z. et al. 2004. Protein patterns of pig oocytes during in vitro maturation. Biol. Reprod. 71: 1533-1539.
4. RUI, R. et al. 2004. Attempts to enhance production of porcine chimeras from embryonic germ cells and preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology. 61: 1225-1235.
5. UCHIDA, M. et al. 2001. Production of transgenic miniature pigs by pronuclear microinjection. Transgen. Res. 10: 577-582.
6. MOFFAT, A.S. 1998. Improving gene transfer into livestock. Science 282: 1619-1620.
7. LAVITRANO, M. et al. 2002. Efficient production by sperm-mediated gene transfer of human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pigs for xenotransplantation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 14230-14235.
8. JAENISCH, R. 1976. Germ line integration and Mendelian transmission of the exogenous Moloney leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73: 1260-1264.
9. CHAN, A.W. et al. 1998. Transgenic cattle produced by reverse-transcribed gene transfer in oocytcs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14028-14033.
10. PFEIFER, A. et al. 2002. Transgenesis by lentiviral vectors: lack of gene silencing in mammalian embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2140-2145.
11. WOLFGANG, M.J. et al. 2001. Rhesus monkey placental transgene expression after lentiviral gene transfer into preimplantation embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 10728-10732.
12. HOFMANN, A. et al. 2003. Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors. EMBO Rep. 4: 1054-1060.
13. LAI, L. et al. 2002. Production of alpha-1.3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 295: 1089-1092.
14. LOI, P., J. FULKA, JR. & G. PTAK. 2003. Amphibian and mammal somatic-cell cloning: different species, common results? Trends Biotechnol. 21: 471-473.
15. BICKENBACH, J.R. 2004. Isolation, characterization, and culture of epithelial stem cells. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 289: 97-102. Humana Press. Totowa. NJ.
16. WATT, F.M. 2002. The stem cell compartment in human interfollicular epidermis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 28: 173-180.
17. KAUR, P. & A. Li. 2000. Adhesive properties of human basal epidermal cells: an analysis of keratinocytc stem cells, transit amplifying cells, and postmitotic differentiating cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 114: 413-420.
18. LAROUCHE, D. 2004. Keratin 19 as a stem cell marker in vivo and in vitro. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 289: 103-110. Human Press. Totowa. NJ. USA.
19. LIU, Y. et al. 2003. Keratin 15 promoter targets putative epithelial stem cells in the hair follicle bulge. J. Invest. Dermatol. 121: 963-968.
20. KOSTER, M. I. 2004. p63 is the molecular switch for initiation of an epithelial stratification program. Genes Dev. 18: 126-131.
21. TUMBAR, T. 2004. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 303: 359-563.
22. CHOVANEC, M. et al. 2004. Decrease of nuclear reactivity to growth-regulatory galectin-1 in senescent human keratinocytes and detection of non-uniform staining profile alterations upon prolonged culture for galectins-1 and -3. Anat. Histol. Fmhryol. 33: 348-354.
23. PURKRÁBKOVÁ, T. et al. 2003. New aspects of galectin functionality in nuclei of cultured bone marrow stromal and epidermal cells: biotinylatcd galectins as tool to detect specific binding sites. Biol. Cell 95: 535-545.
24. KLÍMA, J. et al. 2005. Comparative phenotypic characterization of keratinocytes originating from hair follicles. J. Mol. Histol. 36: 89-96.
25. DVOŘÁNKOVÁ, B. et al. 2002. Dolichos biflorus agglutinin-binding site expression in basal keratinocytes is associated with cell differentiation. Biol. Cell 94: 365-373.
26. LIANG, L. et al. 2004. As epidermal stem cells age they do not substantially change their characteristics. J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 9: 229-237.
27. FERNANDES, K.J.L. et al. 2004. A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells. Nature Cell Biol. 6: 1082-1093.
28. DYCE, P.W. et al. 2004. Stem cells with multilineage potential derived from porcine skin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 316: 651-658.
29. SIEBER-BLUM, M. et al. 2004. Pluripotent neural crest stem cells in the adult hair follicle. Dev. Dynamics 231: 258-269.
30. BAIZABAL, J.M. et al. 2003. Neural stem cells in development and regenerative medicine. Arch. Med. Res. 34: 572-588.
31. AUBERT, J. et al. 2003. Screening for mammalian neural genes via fluorescence-activated cell sorter purification of neural precursors from Sox1-gfp knockin mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(Suppl. 1):11836-11841.
32. CAI, J. et al. 2003. Identifying and tracking neural stem cells. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 31: 18-27.
33. WRIGHT, L.S. et al. 2003. Gene expression in human neural stem cells: effects of leukemia inhibitory factor. J. Neurochem. 86: 179-195.
34. WALDER, S. & P. FERRETTI. 2004. Distinct neural precursors in the developing human spinal cord. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48: 671-674.
35. STORCH, A. et al. 2001. Long-term proliferation and dopaminergic differentiation of human mesencephalic neural precursor cells. Exp. Neurol. 170: 317-325.
36. OUREDNIK, V. et al. 2001. Segregation of human neural stem cells in the developing primate forebrain. Science 293: 1820-1824.
37. ARMSTRONG, R.J. et al. 2003. Transplantation of expanded neural precursor cells from the developing pig ventral mesencephalon in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Exp. Brain. Res. 151: 204-217.
38. FINK, J.S. et al. 2000. Porcine xenografts in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease patients: preliminary results. Cell Transplant. 9: 273-278.
39. SMITH, P.M. & W.F. BLAKEMORE. 2000. Porcine neural progenitors require commitment to the oligodendrocyte lineage prior to transplantation in order to achieve significant remyelination of demyelinated lesions in the adult CNS. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12:2414-2424.
40. 18F]fluorodopa/PET and histology of fetal mesencephalic dopaminergic grafts to the striatum of MPTP-poisoned minipigs. Cell Transplant. 11: 733-746.