The impact of State Tobacco Control Program funding cuts on teens' exposure to tobacco control interventions: Evidence from Florida

American Journal of Health Promotion

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 176-185

  Davis, Kevin C ^a   Crankshaw, Erik ^a   Farrelly, Matthew C ^a   Niederdeppe, Jeff ^b   Watson, Kimberly ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Budget cuts; Prevention research; Smoking prevention; Tobacco control programs

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BUDGET; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; BUDGETS; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING; STATE GOVERNMENT;

EID: 79955669796     PISSN: 08901171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.090211-QUAN-59     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 1): i35-i47. (Pubitemid 39452076)
2. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(suppl 2):16-66.
3. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking? Tob Control. 1998;280:893-899. (Pubitemid 28423916)
4. Biener L, Harris JE, Hamilton W. Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis. BMJ. 2000;321:351-354. (Pubitemid 30496880)
5. Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, Brooks RG. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. JAMA. 2000;284:723-728. (Pubitemid 30646342)
6. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: A Decade of Broken Promises: The 1998 State Tobacco Settlement Ten Years Later. Available at: http://tobaccofreekids. org/reports/settlements/state. php?StateID5FL. Accessed February 20, 2008.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated exposure of adolescents to state-funded anti-tobacco television advertisements: 37 states and the District of Columbia, 1999-2003. MMWR. 2005;54:1077-1080.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Effect of ending an antitobacco youth campaign on adolescent susceptibility to cigarette smoking: Minnesota, 2002-2003. MMWR. 2004;53:301-304.
9. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Hersey JC, Davis KC. Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998-2000. Tob Control. 2008;17:205-210.
10. Hornik RC. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002.
11. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun. 2004;9(suppl 1):71-96. (Pubitemid 38367019)
12. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med. 2002;35:511-518. (Pubitemid 35352221)
13. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML. Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:255-257. (Pubitemid 38176319)
14. Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E, Ray S. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:233-238. (Pubitemid 32113181)
15. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:762-767. (Pubitemid 30246380)
16. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, et al. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:901-907. (Pubitemid 34552885)
17. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, et al. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:425-431. (Pubitemid 40315117)
18. Niederdeppe J, Davis KC, Farrelly MC, Yarsevich J. Stylistic features, need for sensation, and confirmed recall of national smoking prevention advertisements. J Commun. 2007;57:272-292. (Pubitemid 46901537)
19. Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, Farrelly MC. Association between national smoking prevention campaigns and perceived smoking prevalence among youth in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:430-436. (Pubitemid 47562787)
20. Niederdeppe J. Assessing the validity of confirmed ad recall measures for public health communication campaign evaluations. J Health Commun. 2005;10:635-650. (Pubitemid 43154605)
21. Tobler NS, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev. 1997;18:71-128. (Pubitemid 27349949)
22. Williams CL, Perry CL, Farbakhsh K, Veblen-Mortenson S. Project Northland: comprehensive alcohol use prevention for young adolescents, their parents, school, peers and communities. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;13:112-124. (Pubitemid 29162470)
23. Tampa Bay Online: Highlands Today: Student Tobacco Prevention Program May Restart. Available at: http://www2. highlandstoday.com/content/2008/jan/22/ student-tobacco-prevention-programmay-restart/news/. Accessed May 10, 2008.
24. Crankshaw EC, Davis KC, Farrelly MC. The De-Funding of the Florida Tobacco Control Program: Implications for Youth Smoking and Attitudes. Working Paper, RTI International.