The effect of semantic information on saccade trajectory deviations

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1124-1128

  Weaver, Matthew D ^a   Lauwereyns, Johan ^b   Theeuwes, Jan ^c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Exogenous attention; Inhibition of return; Saccade control; Saccade trajectory deviations; Semantic information

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SEMANTICS; TABOO; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955627823     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aizawa H., Wurtz R.H. Reversible inactivation of monkey superior colliculus: I. Curvature of saccadic trajectory. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:2082-2096.
2. Anderson A.K. Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:258-281.
3. Antes J.R. The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 103:62-70.
4. Belopolsky A.V., Devue C., Theeuwes J. Angry faces hold the eyes. Visual Cognition 2011, 19:17-36.
5. Bertels J., Kolinsky R., Morais J. Emotional valence of spoken words influences the spatial orienting of attention. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 2010, 134:264-278.
6. Boulenger V., Roy A.C., Paulignan Y., Deprez V., Jeannerod M., Nazir T.A. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behaviour in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1607-1615.
7. Buswell G.T. How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art 1935, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
8. Cerf M., Frady E.P., Koch C. Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-15.
9. Dale R., Kehoe C., Spivey M.J. Graded motor responses in the time course of categorising atypical exemplars. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35:15-28.
10. De Graef P., Christiaens D., d'Ydewalle G. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research 1990, 52:317-329.
11. Finkbeiner M., Song J.H., Nakayama K., Caramazza A. Engaging the motor system with masked orthographic primes: A kinematic analysis. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:11-22.
12. Fox E., Russo R., Bowels R., Dutton K. Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:681-700.
13. Fox E., Russo R., Dutton K. Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition Emotion 2002, 16:355-379.
14. Georgiou G., Bleakley C., Hayward J., Russo R., Dutton K., Eltiti S., et al. Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:145-158.
15. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Oculomotor capture and inhibition of return. Psychological Research 2002, 66:234-246.
16. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1039-1054.
17. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:538-554.
18. Hanes D.P., Wurtz R.H. Interaction of the frontal eye field and superior colliculus for saccade generation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2001, 85:804-815.
19. Henderson J.M., Weeks P.A., Hollingworth A. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:210-228.
20. Hermans D., De Houwer J. Affective and subjective familiarity ratings of 740 Dutch words. Psychologica Belgica 1994, 34:115-140.
21. Howard L.A., Tipper S.P. Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 113:144-152.
22. Janschewitz K. Taboo, emotionally valenced, and emotionally neutral word norms. Behaviour Research Methods 2008, 40:1065-1074.
23. Loftus G.R., Mackworth N.H. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978, 4:565-572.
24. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 152:60-69.
25. Mackworth N.H., Morandi A.J. The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 1967, 2:547-552.
26. Mathewson K.J., Arnell K.M., Mansfield C.A. Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation. Memory and Cognition 2008, 36:182-200.
27. McKinstry C., Dale R., Spivey M.J. Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science 2008, 19:22-24.
28. McPeek R.M. Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye fields results in curved saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:2699-2711.
29. McPeek R.M., Han J.H., Keller E.L. Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:2577-2590.
30. McSorley E., Haggard P., Walker R. Distractor modulation of saccade trajectories: Spatial separation and symmetry effects. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 155:320-333.
31. Mulckhuyse M., Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:1451-1458.
32. Nummenmaa L., Hyönä J., Calvo M.G. Emotional scene content drives the saccade generation system reflexively. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:305-323.
33. Quaia C., Optican L.M., Goldberg J.H. The maintenance of spatial accuracy by the perisaccadic remapping of visual receptive fields. Neural Networks 1998, 11:1229-1240.
34. Schall J.D. Neuronal basis of saccadic eye movements. Vision and visual dysfunction: The neural basis of visual function 1991, vol. 4:388-442. Macmillan Press, London.
35. Schall J.D., Hanes D.P. Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search. Nature 1993, 366:467-469.
36. Song J.H., Nakayama K. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:360-366.
37. Sparks D.L., Hartwich-Young R. The deeper layers of the superior colliculus. The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements 1989, 213-255. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. R.H. Wurtz, M.E. Goldberg (Eds.).
38. Spivey M.J. The continuity of mind 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.
39. Spivey M.J., Grosjean M., Knoblich G. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 2005, 102:10393-10398.
40. Stolz J.A. Exogenous orienting does not reflect an encapsulated set of processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:187-201.
41. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception and Psychophysics 1991, 50:184-193.
42. Theeuwes J. Bottom-up capture and attentional set: Selective search for colour and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:799-806.
43. Theeuwes J., Godijn R. Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference. Vision Research 2004, 44:1485-1492.
44. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., Hahn S., Irwin D.E. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science 1998, 9:379-385.
45. Theeuwes J., Van der Stigchel S. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing. Vision Research 2009, 49:1307-1315.
46. Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2007). The emotional modulation of the attentional blink: Effects of taboo and non-taboo arousing stimuli in a dual and single task paradigm. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University.
47. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Houghton G. Behavioral consequences of selection from population codes. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 223-245. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
48. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Paul M.A. Reaching affects saccade trajectories. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 136:241-249.
49. Van der Stigchel S. Recent advances in the study of saccade trajectory deviations. Vision Research 2010, 50:1619-1627.
50. Van der Stigchel S., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30:666-679.
51. Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:579-582.
52. Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cueing. Perception and Psychophysics 2007, 69:719-731.
53. Walker R., McSorley E., Haggard P. The control of saccade trajectories: Direction of curvature depends upon prior knowledge of target location and saccade latency. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:129-138.
54. Weaver M.D., Lauwereyns J. Attentional capture and hold: The oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces. Psychological Research 2011, 75:10-23.
55. Welsh T.N., Elliot D. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 2005, 119:123-142.
56. Yarbus A.L. Eye movements and vision 1967, Plenum, New York, NY.