Attentional capture and hold: The oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 10-23

  Weaver, Matthew D ^a   Lauwereyns, Johan ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650771945     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0284-5     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(1), 62-70.
2. Archambault, A., O'Donnell, C., & Schyns, P. G. (1999). Blind to object changes: When learning the same object at different levels of categorization modifies its perception. Psychological Science, 10(3), 249-255.
3. Austen, E. L., & Enns, J. T. (2003). Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer. Journal of Vision, 3, 64-74.
4. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66-80.
5. Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. The American Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 181-199.
6. Bindemann, M., Burton, A. M., Hooge, I. T., Jenkins, R., & de Haan, E. H. (2005). Faces retain attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1048-1053.
7. Bindemann, M., Burton, A. M., Langton, S. R. H., Schweinberger, S. R., & Doherty, M. J. (2007). The control of attention to faces. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1-8.
8. Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1441-1458.
10. Cerf, M., Frady, E. P., & Koch, C. (2009). Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. Journal of Vision, 9(12), 1-15.
11. Collier, G., Johnson, D. F., & Berman, J. (1998). Patch choice as a function of procurement cost and encounter rate. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69(1), 5-16.
12. De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317-329.
13. Devue, C., Laloyaux, C., Feyers, D., Theeuwes, J., & Brédart, S. (2009). Do pictures of faces, and which ones, capture attention in the attentional-blindness paradigm? Perception, 38, 552-568.
14. Farah, M. J. (1995). Dissociable systems for visual recognition: A cognitive neuropsychology approach. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 101-119). Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Farah, M. J. (1996). Is face recognition "special"? Evidence from neuropsychology. Behavioural Brain Research, 76, 181-189.
16. Farah, M. J., Rabinowitz, C., Quinn, G. E., & Liu, G. T. (2000). Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1), 117-123.
17. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37(12), 1673-1682.
19. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vol. 2, pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychological Science, 8(1), 51-55.
21. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2004). Scene perception for psycholinguists. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferriera (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 1-58). New York: Psychology Press.
22. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10(5), 438-443.
23. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210-228.
24. Hsiao, J. H., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19(10), 998-1006.
25. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 420-456.
26. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.
28. Klein, R., Kingstone, A., & Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 46-65). New York: Springer.
29. Langton, S. R. H., Law, A. S., Burton, A. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Attention capture by faces. Cognition, 107(1), 330-342.
30. Lavie, N., Ro, T., & Russell, C. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces. Psychological Science, 14(5), 510-515.
31. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 501-506.
32. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2(4), 357-380.
33. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4), 565-572.
34. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-280.
35. Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics, 2(11), 547-552.
36. McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(3), 563-581.
37. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLEARN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164-181.
38. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 191-211.
39. Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75-92.
40. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44(4), 369-378.
41. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(2), 283-290.
42. Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of judgement and decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
44. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(7), 1863-1874.
45. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), 21-50.
46. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
47. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373.
48. Ro, T., Friggel, A., & Lavie, N. (2007). Attentional biases for faces and body parts. Visual Cognition, 15(3), 322-348.
49. Ro, T., Russell, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychological Science, 12(1), 94-99.
50. Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 377-396.
51. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7(5), 301-305.
52. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644-649.
53. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
54. Stolz, J. A. (1996). Exogenous orienting does not reflect an encapsulated set of processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 187-201.
55. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 901-913.
56. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70(2), 191-210.
57. Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is "change blindness" attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 163-173.
58. West, G. L., Anderson, A. A. K., & Pratt, J. (2009). Motivationally significant stimuli show visual prior entry: Evidence for attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1032-1042.
59. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.