The assessment of lesson plans in teacher education: A case study in assessment validity and reliability

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 847-857

  Tummons, Jonathan ^a  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; New Literacy Studies; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955577328     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930903125256     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Avis, J. 2005. Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 2: 209-22.
2. Barton, D. 1994. Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
4. Barton, D., M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic, eds. 2000. Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
5. Baume, D. 2001. A briefing on assessment of portfolios. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network.
6. Baume, D., and M. Yorke. 2002. The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 1: 7-25.
7. Belfiore, M., T. Defoe, S. Folinsbee, J. Hunter, and N. Jackson. 2004. Reading work: Literacies in the new workplace. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2006. Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 4: 399-413.
9. Brown, S. 1999. Assessing practice. In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, ed. S. Brown and A. Glasner, 95-105. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
10. Chase, S.E. 2005. Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 651-80. London: Sage.
11. Christians, C. 2005. Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 139-64. London: Sage.
12. Dysthe, O., and K. Engelsen. 2004. Portfolios and assessment in teacher education in Norway: A theory-based discussion of different models in two sites. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 239-58.
13. Fawns, M., and R. Ivanic. 2001. Form-filling as a social practice: Taking power into our own hands. In Powerful literacies, ed. J. Crowther, M. Hamilton, and L. Tett, 80-93. Leicester: National Institute for Adult Continuing Education.
14. Fisher, R., and K. Webb. 2006. Subject specialist pedagogy and initial teacher training for the learning and skills sector in England: The context, a response and some critical issues. Journal of Further and Higher Education 30, no. 4: 337-49.
15. Gale, K., K. Martin, and G. McQueen. 2002. Triadic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 6: 557-67.
16. Gee, J. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
17. Hillier, Y. 2005. Reflective teaching in further and adult education. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
18. Imhof, M., and C. Picard. 2009. Views on using portfolio in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 25, no. 1: 149-54.
19. Johnston, B. 2004. Summative assessment of portfolios: An examination of different approaches to agreement over outcomes. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 3: 395-412.
20. Klenowski, V., S. Askew, and E. Carnell. 2006. Porfolios for learning, assessment and professional education in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 267-86.
21. Knight, P.T. 2002. Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3: 275-86.
22. Knight, P.T. 2006. The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 4: 435-52.
23. Knight, P.T., and M. Yorke. 2003. Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
24. Knight, P.T., and M. Yorke. 2008. Assessment close-up: The limits of exquisite descriptions of achievement. International Journal of Educational Research 47, no. 3: 175-83.
25. Kvale, S. 1996. Examinations reexamined: Certification of students or certification of knowledge? In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, ed. S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 215-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kvale, S. 2007. Doing interviews. London: Sage.
27. Lea, J. 2003. The organisation of post-compulsory education. In Working in post-compulsory education, ed. J. Lea, D. Hayes, A. Armitage, L. Lomas, and S. Markless, 57-86. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.
28. Lewins, A., and C. Silver. 2007. Using software in qualitative research. London: Sage.
29. Lillis, T. 2001. Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
30. Mok, M., C. Lung, D. Cheng, R. Cheung, and M. Ng. 2006. Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 4: 415-33.
31. Nicholls, G. 2002. Developing teaching and learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
32. Price, M. 2005. Assessment standards: The role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 215-30.
33. Rapley, T. 2007. Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. London: Sage.
34. Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2000. Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ehtics and the academy, ed. M. Strathern, 57-89. London: Routledge.
35. Shulman, L. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15, no. 2: 4-14.
36. Smith, K., and H. Tillema. 2003. Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 6: 625-48.
37. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
38. Swales, J. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Taylor, I. 1997. Developing learning in professional education. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
40. Tigelaar, D., D. Dolmans, I. Wolfhagen, and C. van der Vleuten. 2005. Quality issues in judging portfolios: Implications for organising teaching portfolio assessment procedures. Studies in Higher Education 30, no. 5: 595-610.
41. Tight, M. 2003. Researching higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
42. Tillema, H., and K. Smith. 2007. Portfolio appraisal: In search of criteria. Teaching and Teacher Education 23, no. 4: 442-56.
43. Tummons, J. 2008. Assessment, and the literacy practices of trainee PCET teachers. International Journal of Educational Research 47, no. 3: 184-91.
44. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Yorke, M. 2001. Assessment: A guide for senior managers. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network.