Gestalt Principles in the Control of Motor Action

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 443-462

  Klapp, Stuart T ^a   Jagacinski, Richard J ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gestalt; Motor control; Multitasking; Perceptual motor

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

GESTALT THEORY; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79955516894     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022361     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Albert N.B., Weigelt M., Hazeltine E., Ivry R.B. Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1107-1116. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1107.
2. Allport A. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. Perspectives on perception and action 1987, 395-416. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Heuer, A. Sanders (Eds.).
3. Attneave F., Block G. Apparent movement in tridimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 13:301-307.
4. Banks W.P., Isham E.A. We infer rather than perceive the moment we decided to act. Psychological Science 2009, 20:17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02254.x.
5. Bartlett F.C. Remembering 1932, University Press, Cambridge, England.
6. Bernstein N. Coordination and regulation of movement 1967, Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
7. Binet A. Recherches sur le mouvement de quelques jeunes enfants [Investigation concerning the movement of several young children]. Revue philosophique 1890, 29:138-155.
8. Birren J.E. The significance of age changes in speed of perception and psychomotor skills. Psychological aspects of aging 1956, 97-104. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. J.E. Anderson (Ed.).
9. Bratzke D., Rolke B., Ulrich R. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: Motor bottleneck or response monitoring?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1413-1426. doi: 10.1037/a0015874.
10. Bregman A.S. Auditory streaming is cumulative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978, 4:380-387. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.380.
11. Bregman A.S. Auditory scene analysis 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Bregman A.S., Campbell J. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 89:244-249. doi: 10.1037/h0031163.
13. Bryan W.L., Harter N. Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review 1899, 6:345-375.
14. Chase W.G. Visual information processing. Handbook of perception and human performance 1986, 2. Wiley, New York, NY, Chapter 28. K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J.P. Thomas (Eds.).
15. Cliff R. Attention sharing in the performance of a dynamic dual task. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1973, 3:241-248. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309212.
16. Cohen A., Ivry R.I., Keele S.W. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:17-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.17.
17. Dannenbring G.L., Bregman A.S. Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1976, 2:544-555. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.544.
18. Deutsch D. The generation of two isochronous responses in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics 1983, 34:331-337.
19. Diedrichsen J., Hazeltine E., Kennerley S., Ivry R.B. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science 2001, 12:493-498. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00391.
20. Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes]. In W. G. Koster (Ed. & Trans.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412-431). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland. (Original work published 1868).
21. Fischman M.G., Christina R.W., Anson J.G. Memory drum theory's C movement: Revelations from Franklin Henry. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2008, 79:312-318.
22. Fitts P.M., Posner M.I. Human performance 1967, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
23. Franz E.A. On the perceptual control of bimanual performance. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 36:380-381.
24. Franz E.A., Zelaznik H.N., Swinnen S., Walter C. Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior 2001, 33:103-112. doi: 10.1080/00222890109601906.
25. García-Albea J.I., del Viso S., Igoa J.M. Movement errors and levels of processing in sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 1989, 18:145-161. doi: 10.1007/BF01069052.
26. Gottsdanker R. The attaining and maintaining of preparation. Attention and performance V 1975, 33-49. Academic Press, New York, NY. P.M.A. Rabbitt, S. Dornic (Eds.).
27. Greenwald A.G. A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 86:20-25. doi: 10.1037/h0029960.
28. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:632-636. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.632.
29. Greenwald A.G. A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: Comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:221-225. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.221.
30. Greenwald A.G., Shulman H.G. On doing two things at once: II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 101:70-76. doi: 10.1037/h0035451.
31. Haken H., Kelso J.A.S., Bunz H. A theoretical model of phase transition in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics 1985, 51:347-356. doi: 10.1007/BF00336922.
32. Hamilton F., Rochester L., Paul L., Rafferty D., O'Leary C., Evans J. Walking and talking: An investigation of cognitive-motor dual tasking in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2009, 15:1215-1227. doi: 10.1177/1352458509106712.
33. Henry F.M., Rogers D.E. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly 1960, 31:448-458.
34. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-878.
35. Hulstijn W., Van Galen G.P. Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of required length. Acta Psychologica 1983, 54:23-49. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(83)90021-5.
36. Immink M.A., Wright D.L. Motor programming during high and low contextual interference practice conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:423-437. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.423.
37. Jagacinski R.J., Flach J.M. Control theory for humans 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
38. Jagacinski R.J., Kim T.H., Lavender S.A. Rhythmic force patterns in the golf swing. Science and golf V: Proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf 2008, 82-86. Energy in Motion, Mesa, AZ. D. Crews, R. Lutz (Eds.).
39. Jagacinski R.J., Kim T.H., Lavender S.A. Managing the rhythmic complexity of hitting a golf ball. Journal of Motor Behavior 2009, 41:469-477. doi: 10.3200/35-08-075.
40. Jagacinski R.J., Marshburn E.A., Klapp S.T., Jones M.R. Tests of streamed vs. integrated structure in polyrhythmic tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior 1988, 20:416-442.
41. Jagacinski R.J., Peper C.E., Beek P.J. Dynamic, stochastic, and topological aspects of polyrhythmic performance. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000, 32:323-336. doi: 10.1080/00222890009601383.
42. Jagacinski R.J., Repperger D.W., Moran M.S., Ward S.L., Glass B. Fitts' law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980, 6:309-320. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.6.2.309.
43. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, II. Holt, New York, NY.
44. Jennings J.R., van der Molen M.W. Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:434-459. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.434.
45. Jones M.R. Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review 1976, 83:323-355. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.323.
46. Jones M.R., Jagacinski R.J., Yee W., Floyd R.L., Klapp S.T. Tests of attentional flexibility in listening to polyrhythmic patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:293-307. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.293.
47. Jones M.R., Maser D.J., Kidd G.R. Rate and structure in memory for auditory patterns. Memory & Cognition 1978, 6:246-258.
48. Jones M.R., Yee W. Attending to auditory events: The role of temporal organization. Cognitive aspects of human audition 1993, 69-112. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. S. McAdams, E. Brigand (Eds.).
49. Jordan M.I. The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a relearning task. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27:179-192.
50. Kandel S., Alvarez C.J., Vallee N. Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:18-31. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.18.
51. Keele S.W. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin 1968, 70:387-403. doi: 10.1037/h0026739.
52. Keele S.W. Motor control. Handbook of perception and human performance 1986, 2. Wiley, New York, NY, Chapter 30. K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J.P. Thomas (Eds.).
53. Kim, T. (2009). Age-related differences in rhythmic coordination in golf (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University.
54. Klapp S.T. Syllable-dependent pronunciation latencies in number naming: A replication. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 102:1138-1140. doi: 10.1037/h0036345.
55. Klapp S.T. Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles. Journal of Motor Behavior 1977, 9:301-312.
56. Klapp S.T. Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:375-381.
57. Klapp S.T. Temporal compatibility in dual motor tasks: II. Simultaneous articulation and hand movements. Memory & Cognition 1981, 9:398-401.
58. Klapp S.T. Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:1015-1027. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1015.
59. Klapp S.T. Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:135-150. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602129.
60. Klapp S.T. Comments on the classic Henry and Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: Resolving the issue of simple and choice reaction time. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2010, 81:105-112.
61. Klapp, S. T. (2010b). Evidence for online control in a choice reaction time paradigm. Unpublished manuscript, California State University, East Bay.
62. Klapp S.T., Anderson W.G., Berrian R.W. Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 100:368-374. doi: 10.1037/h0035471.
63. Klapp S.T., Greenberg L.A. Temporary activation of perceptual-motor associations: A stimulus-response interpretation of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1266-1285. doi: 10.1037/a0016536.
64. Klapp S.T., Greim D.M. Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:509-521. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.509.
65. Klapp S.T., Haas B.W. Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:193-209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.193.
66. Klapp S.T., Hill M.D., Tyler J.G., Martin Z.E., Jagacinski R.J., Jones M.R. On marching to two different drummers: Perceptual aspects of the difficulties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:814-827. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.11.6.814.
67. Klapp S.T., Hinkley L.B. The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:255-269. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.255.
68. Klapp S.T., Kelly P.A., Netick A. Hesitations in continuous tracking induced by a concurrent discrete task. Human Factors 1987, 29:327-337.
69. Klapp S.T., Nelson J.M., Jagacinski R.J. Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently?. Journal of Motor Behavior 1998, 30:301-322. doi: 10.1080/00222899809601346.
70. Klapp S.T., Rodriguez G. Programming time as a function of response duration: A replication of "dit-dah" without possible guessing artifacts. Journal of Motor Behavior 1982, 14:46-56.
71. Klapp S.T., Wyatt E.P., Lingo W.M. Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior 1974, 6:263-271.
72. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology 1935, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, England.
73. Köhler W. Gestalt psychology 1947, Liveright, New York, NY.
74. Kovacs A.J., Buchanan J.J., Shea C.H. Impossible is nothing: 5:3 and 4:3 multi-frequency bimanual coordination. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:249-259. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2031-y.
75. Krampe R.T., Kliegl R., Mayr U., Engbert R., Vorberg D. The fast and the slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: Parallel versus integrated timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:206-233. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.206.
76. Kunde W., Koch I., Hoffmann J. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):87-106. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000143.
77. Levy J., Pashler H. Task prioritization in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:507-525. doi: 10.1002/acp.1378.
78. Liao M.J., Jagacinski R.J. A dynamical systems approach to manual tracking performance. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000, 32:361-378. doi: 10.1080/00222890009601386.
79. Libet B., Gleason C.A., Wright E.W., Pearl D.K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 1983, 106:623-642. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.3.623.
80. MacKay D.G. The organization of perception and action 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
81. MacKay D.G., Bowman R.W. On producing the meaning in sentences. American Journal of Psychology 1969, 82:23-39. doi: 10.2307/1420605.
82. Magnuson C.E., Robin D.A., Wright D.L. Motor programming when sequencing multiple elements of the same duration. Journal of Motor Behavior 2008, 40:532-544. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.6.532-544.
83. Magnuson C.E., Wright D.L., Verwey W.B. Changes in the incidental context impacts search but not loading of the motor buffer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):935-951. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000675.
84. McLeod P., Posner M.I. Privileged loops from percept to act. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes 1984, 55-66. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
85. Mechsner F. A psychological approach to human voluntary movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 36:355-370.
86. Mechsner F., Kerzel D., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 2001, November 1, 414:69-73. doi: 10.1038/35102060.
87. Miller G.A., Heise G.A. The trill threshold. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1950, 22:637-638. doi: 10.1121/1.1906663.
88. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
89. Müsseler J., Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:861-872. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861.
90. Netick A., Klapp S.T. Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:766-782. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.766.
91. Neumann O., Klotz K.W. Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification?. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing 1994, 123-150. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
92. Palmer C., Pfordresher P.Q. Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review 2003, 110:683-712. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.683.
93. Palmer C., van de Sande C. Range of planning in skilled music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:947-962. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.947.
94. Palmer S. Modern theories of Gestalt perception. Understanding vision: An interdisciplinary perspective 1992, 39-70. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA. G.W. Humphreys (Ed.).
95. Palmer S. Gestalt perception. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences 1999, 344-346. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R.A. Wilson, F.C. Keil (Eds.).
96. Park J.H., Shea C.H. Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:33-40. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602119.
97. Pashler H.E. Doing two things at the same time. American Scientist 1993, 81:48-55.
98. Pashler H.E. The psychology of attention 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
99. Peper C.E., Beek P.J., van Wieringen P.C.W. Bifurcations in polyrhythmic tapping: In search of Farey principles. Tutorials in motor neuroscience 1991, 413-431. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. J. Requin, G.E. Stelmach (Eds.).
100. Peper C.E., Beek P.J., van Wieringen P.C.W. Coupling strength in tapping a 2:3 polyrhythm. Human Movement Science 1995, 14:217-245. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(95)00010-P.
101. Peters M. When can attention not be divided?. Journal of Motor Behavior 1994, 26:196-199. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941674.
102. Pressing J. Testing dynamical and cognitive models of rhythmic pattern production. Motor control and sensory-motor integration: Issues and directions 1995, 141-170. Elsevier Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. D.J. Glencross, J.P. Piek (Eds.).
103. Pressnitzer D., Hupé J.M. Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology 2006, 16:1351-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054.
104. Raibert, M. H. (1977). Motor control and learning by the state-space model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
105. Roberts B., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Effects of the build-up and resetting of auditory stream segregation on temporal discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:992-1006. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.992.
106. Rosenbaum D.A., Gordon A.M., Stillings N.A., Feinstein M.H. Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech. Memory & Cognition 1987, 15:217-224.
107. Rosenbaum D.A., Kenny S., Derr M.A. Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:86-102. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.9.1.86.
108. Rosenbaum D.A., Saltzman E., Kingman A. Choosing between movement sequences. Preparatory states and processes 1984, 119-134. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Kornblum, J. Requin (Eds.).
109. Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C., Remington R.W. How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1368-1384. doi: 10.1037/a0015784.
110. Ruthruff E., Pashler H.E., Hazeltine E. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement?. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:801-816.
111. Sakai K., Kitaguchi K., Hikosaka O. Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 152:229-242. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8.
112. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:463-468.
113. Schlaghecken F., Klapp S.T., Maylor E.A. Either or neither, but not both: Locating the effects of masked primes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 2009, 276:515-521. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0933.
114. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
115. Smulders F.T.Y., Kok A., Kenemans J.L., Bashore T.R. The temporary selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies. Acta Psychologica 1995, 90:97-109. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00032-P.
116. Snyder J.S., Carter O.L., Lee S., Hannon E.E., Alian C. Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1007-1016. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.1007.
117. Sternberg S., Monsell S., Knoll R.L., Wright C.E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. Information processing in motor control and learning 1978, 117-152. Academic Press, New York, NY. G.E. Stelmach (Ed.).
118. Taylor D.W. Learning telegraphic code. Psychological Bulletin 1943, 40:461-487. doi: 10.1037/h0054172.
119. Telford C.W. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1931, 14:1-36. doi: 10.1037/h0073262.
120. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:3-18. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3.
121. van Iersel M.B., Ribbers H., Munneke M., Borm G.F., Rikkert M.G.O. The effect of cognitive dual tasks on balance during walking in physically fit elderly people. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007, 88:187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.031.
122. van Mier H., Hulstijn W., Petersen S. Changes in motor planning during the acquisition of movement patterns in a continuous task. Acta Psychologica 1993, 82:291-312. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90017-L.
123. Verwey W.B. Buffer loading and chunking in sequential keypressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:544-562. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.544.
124. Verwey W.B. Concatenating familiar movement sequence: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica 2001, 106:69-95. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00027-5.
125. Verwey W.B., Eikelboom T. Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence production task. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:171-182. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602131.
126. Welford A.T. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high speed performance. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
127. Wickens D.D. The transference of conditioned excitation and conditioned inhibition from one muscle group to the antagonistic muscle group. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1938, 22:101-123. doi: 10.1037/h0058007.
128. Wright D.L., Black C.B., Immink M.A., Brueckner S., Magnuson C. Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenation of movement sequences during random but not during blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 36:39-50. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.1.39-50.
129. Wühr P., Müsseler J. Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:1260-1270. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1260.
130. Wulf G., Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:648-660.
131. Yamanishi J., Kawato M., Suzuki R. Two coupled oscillators as a model for the coordinated finger tapping by both hands. Biological Cybernetics 1980, 37:219-225. doi: 10.1007/BF00337040.
132. Zelaznik H.N., Shapiro D.C., Carter M.C. The specification of digit and duration during motor programming: A new method of precueing. Journal of Motor Behavior 1982, 14:57-68.
133. Zwickel J., Grosjean M., Prinz W. On interference effects in concurrent perception and action. Psychological Research 2010, 74:152-171. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0226-2.