Online political participation in Spain: The impact of traditional and internet resources

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 356-368

  Anduiza, Eva ^a   Gallego, Aina ^b   Cantijoch, Marta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Heckman model; Internet; Online political participation; Resources; Spain

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955507180     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331681003791891     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anduiza, E. (2002). Individual characteristics, institutional incentives and electoral abstention in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41(5), 643-673.
2. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216.
3. Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A., & Fiorina, M. P. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417-439.
6. Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 165-190.
8. Delli Carpini, M. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17(4), 341-349.
9. Di Genaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2006). The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299-313.
10. Di Maggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the "digital divide" to "digital inequality": Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper 15. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School.
11. Gibson, R. K., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2005). Online participation in the UK: Testing a 'contextualised' model of Internet effects. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(2), 561-583.
12. Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2008). Political communication. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative politics (pp. 473-492). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Hargittai, E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. In D. C. Jones (Ed.), New economy handbook (pp. 821-839). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475-492.
15. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
16. Hoff, J. (2008). Virtual capital? Internet competence and political participation in Denmark. Politik, 9, 83-93.
17. Jacobs, L. R., & Skocpol, T. (2005). Inequality and American democracy: What we know and what we need to learn. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
18. Johnson, T. J., Hays, C. E., & Hays, S. P. (Eds.). (1998). Engaging the public: How the government and the media can reinvigorate the American democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19. Kolar Prevost, A., & Schaffner, B. F. (2008). Digital divide or just another absentee ballot? Evaluating Internet voting in the 2004 Michigan Democratic primary. American Politics Research, 36(4), 510-529.
20. Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476-498.
21. Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace "revolution." Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Morton, R., & Cameron, C. (1992). Elections and the theory of campaign contributions: A survey and critical analysis. Economics & Politics, 4(1), 79-108.
23. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (Eds.). (2008). Digital citizenship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25. Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Panagopoulos, C. (2007). Technology and the transformation of political campaign communications. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 423-424.
27. Peretti, J., & Micheletti, M. (2004). The Nike sweatshop email: Political consumerism, Internet, and culture jamming. In M. Micheletti, A. Føllesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 127-142). London, England: Transaction Publishers.
28. van de Donk, W., Loader, B., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens, and social movements. London, England: Routledge.
29. van Deth, J., Montero, J. R., & Westholm, A. (Eds.). (2007). Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative perspective. London, England: Routledge.
30. van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19, 315-326.
31. Vedel, T., & Cann, I. M. (2008). Une communication électorale de rupture? L'Internet dans les strategies des candidats et les pratiques d'information des électeurs [A breaking electoral communication? Internet in the candidates' strategies and in voters' information practices]. In P. Perrineau, (Dir.), Le vote de rupture (pp. 51-75). Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
32. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.