Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 443-456

  Meyer, Martin ^a   Bhattacharya, Sujit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344223003     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045120.04489.80     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BHATTACHARYA, S., KHAN, M. T. R. (2001), Monitoring technology trends through patent analysis: A case study of thin film. Research Evaluation, 10 (1): 33-15.
2. BHATTACHARYA, S., KRETSCHMER, H., MEYER, M. (2003), Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 369-390.
3. BHATTACHARYA, S., Meyer, M. (2003), Large firms and the science-technology interface - Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 265-279.
4. CARAYANNIS, E. G., LAGET, P. (2004), Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: public-private, EU-US R&D partnerships. R&D Management, 34 (1): 17-31.
5. DANELL, R., PERSSON, O. (2003), Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 58 (2): 205-218.
6. ETZKOWITZ, H., WEBSTER, A., GEBHARDT, C., TERRA, B. R. C. (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29 (2): 313-330.
7. GLÄNZEL, W. (2001), National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51 (1): 69-115.
8. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2001), Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50 (2): 199-214.
9. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2004), Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship, In: H. MOED, W. GLÄNZEL, U. SCHMOCH (Eds), Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators for Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
10. KATZ, J. S., MARTIN, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1): 1-18.
11. KRETSCHMER, H. (1997), Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 40 (3): 579-591.
12. LAUDEL, G. (2001), What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11 (1): 3-15.
13. MELIN, G., PERSSON, O. (1996), Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36 (3): 363-377.
14. MEYER, M. (2000a), What is special about patent citations? Scientometrics, 48 (2): 151-178.
15. MEYER, M. (2000b), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29 (3): 409-434.
16. MEYER, M. S. (2001), Between Technology and Science - Exploring an Emerging Field. Knowledge Flows and Networking on the Nano-scale. DPhil thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton.
17. MEYER, M. (2003), Are academic patents an indicator of useful university research? Research Evaluation, 12 (1): 17-27.
18. MEYER, M., SINILÄINEN, T., UTECHT, J. T. (2003), Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators - A study of university-related patents and a survey of inventors. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 321-350.
19. NARIN, F., STEVENS, K., WHITLOW, E. S. (1991), Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21 (3): 313-323.
20. PAVITT, K. (1998), The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27 (8): 793-805.
21. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1965), Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6 (4): 553-568.
22. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1984), The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. Research Policy, 13 (1): 3-20.
23. WALKER, R. D. (1995), Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature. The Scarecrow Press: Metuchen, NJ and London.