Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database

Research Evaluation

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 87-102

  Lissoni, Francesco ^a   Llerena, Patrick ^b   McKelvey, Maureen ^c   Sanditov, Bulat ^d  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d UNU MERIT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46249094989     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820208X287171     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Azagra-Caro, J and P Llerena 2003 Types of contractual funding and university patents: from analysis to a case study. Paper prepared for Knowledge and Economic and Social Change Conference, Manchester, 7-9 April.
2. Balconi, M, S Breschi and F Lissoni 2004 Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145.
3. Baldini, N, R Grimaldi and M Sobrero 2006 Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: a study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518-532.
4. Ben-David, J 1977 Centers of Learning. Britain, France, Germany, United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Bok, D C 2003 Universities in the Marketplace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Calderini, M, P Garrone and M Sobrero 2003 Corporate Governance, Market Structure and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7. Clark, B R ed. 1993 The Research Foundations of Graduate Education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Crespi, G, A Geuna and B Verspagen 2006 University IPRs and knowledge transfer: is the IPR ownership model more efficient? SPRU Electronic Working Paper 154, University of Sussex.
9. Dosi, G, P Llerena and P Sylos-Labini 2006 The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450-1464.
10. EC, European Commission 1995 The Green Paper on Innovation. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
11. EC, European Commission 2003 Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. Luxembourg: EC.
12. Fabrizio, K and A DiMinin 2005 Commercializing the laboratory: faculty patenting and the open science environment. Goizueta Business School Paper Series, wp GBS-OM-2005-004. Emory University.
13. Gallochat, A 2003 French technology transfer and IP policies. In Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris: OECD.
14. Gering, T and U Schmoch 2003 Management of intellectual assets by German public research organisations. In Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris: OECD.
15. Geuna, A 1999 The Economics of Knowledge Production. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16. Geuna, A and L J J Nesta 2006 University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
17. Goldfarb, B and M Henrekson 2003 Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639-658.
18. Henderson, R, A Jaffe and M Trajtenberg 1998 Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
19. Iversen, E J, M Gulbrandsen and A Klitkou 2007 A baseline for the impact of academic patenting legislation in Norway. Scien-tometrics, 70(2), 393-414.
20. Lach, S and M Shankerman 2003 Incentives and invention in universities. NBER Working Paper 9727. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
21. Lissoni, F, B Sanditov and G Tarasconi 2006 The KEINS database on academic inventors: methodology and contents. CESPRI Working Paper 181. Università Bocconi, Milan.
22. Meyer, M 2003 Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation, 12(1), April, 17-27.
23. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2001 Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 317-355.
24. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2005 The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 115-127.
25. Mowery, D C, R R Nelson, B N Sampat and A Ziedonis 2004 Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Business Books.
26. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2003 Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris: OECD.
27. OST, Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques 2004 Indi-cateurs de sciences et de technologies, Rapport de I'Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. Paris: Economica.
28. PVA-MV, 2003 Report on the Abolition of the German Professors Privilege: Overview of Changes and Challenges, Stockholm: Vinnova - Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems.
29. Saragossi, S and B van Pottelsberghe 2003 What patent data reveals about universities: the case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47-51.
30. Schmiemann, M and J-N Durvy 2003 New approaches to technology transfer from publicly funded research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 9-15.
31. Thursby, J, A Fuller and M Thursby 2007 US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. NBER Working Paper 13256. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32. Verspagen, B 2006 University research, intellectual property rights and european innovation systems. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 607-632.