Cranial sexual dimorphism of identified subjects (collection Olivier, MNHN, Paris): An evaluation by geometric morphometrics;Dimorphisme sexuel du crâne de sujets identifiés (collection Olivier, MNHN, Paris): Évaluation par morphométrie géométrique

Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris

Volumn 22, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 216-229

  Guyomarc'h, P ^a   Bruzek, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Olivier collection; Sexual dimorphism; Skull

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955462791     PISSN: 00378984     EISSN: 17775469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13219-010-0019-6     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bruzek J (2002) A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 117: 157-68.
2. Murail P, Bruzek J, Houët F, et al (2005) DSP: a tool for probalistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variation in hip-bone measurements. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 17: 167-76.
3. Waldron T (1987) The relative survival of the human skeleton: implication for palaeopathology. In: Boddindton A, Garland AN, Janaway RC (eds) Death, decay and reconstruction: approaches to archaeology and forensic science. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 55-64.
4. Murail P, Bruzek J, Braga J (1999) A new approach to sexual diagnosis in past populations. Practical adjustments from van Vark's procedure. Int J Osteoarchaeol 9: 39-53.
5. Ferembach D, Stloukal M, Schwidetzky I (1979) Recommandations pour déterminer l'âge et le sexe sur le squelette. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 6: 7-45.
6. Stojanowski CM, Seidemann RM, Doran GH (2002) Differential skeletal preservation at Windover Pond: causes and consequences. Am J Phys Anthropol 119: 15-26.
7. Masset C (1987) Le recrutement d'un ensemble funéraire. In: Duday H, Masset C (eds) Anthropologie physique et archéologie: méthode d'étude des sépultures. Éditions du CNRS, Paris, pp 111-34.
8. Krogman WM, Iscan MY (1986) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, 551 p.
9. Walrath DE, Turner P, Bruzek J (2004) Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination. Am J Phys Anthropol 125: 132-7.
10. Walker PL (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 136: 39-50.
11. Steyn M, Iscan Y (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98: 9-16.
12. Deshmukh AG, Devershi DB (2006) Comparison of cranial sex determination by univariate and multivariate analysis. J Anat Soc India 55: 48-51.
13. Meindl RS, Lovejoy CO, Mensforth RP, et al (1985) Accuracy and direction of error in the sexing of the skeleton: implications for paleodemography. Am J Phys Anthropol 68: 79-85.
14. Grubweiser P, Mühlmann R, Berger B, et al (2006) A new "miniSTR-multiplex" displaying reduced amplicon lengths for the analysis of degraded DNA. Int J Legal Med 120: 115-20.
15. Wurmb-Schwark N, von Bosinkin H, Ritz-Timme S (2007) What do the X and Y chromosomes tell us about sex and gender in forensic case analysis? J Forensic Leg Med 14: 27-30.
16. Frayer DW, Wolpoff MH (1985) Sexual dimorphism. Annu Rev Anthropol 14: 429-73.
17. Uytterschaut HT (1986) Sexual dimorphism in human skulls. A comparison of sexual dismorphism in different populations. Hum Evol 1: 243-50.
18. Kemkes A, Göbel T (2006) Metric assessment of the "mastoid triangle" for sex determination: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 51: 985-9.
19. Rösing FW, Graw M, Marre B, et al (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. HOMO-J Comp Hum Biol 58: 75-89.
20. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, New York, 435 p.
21. Slice DE (2007) Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol 36: 261-81.
22. Howells WW (1973) Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of difference among recent human populations. Harvard University, 259 p.
23. Olivier G, Demoulin F (1981) Pratique anthropologique à l'usage des étudiants. Université Paris-VII, Paris, 139 p.
24. Bräuer G (1988) Osteometrie. In: Knussmann R, Martin R (eds) Anthropologie Handbuch der vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen. Fisher, Stuttgart, New York, pp 160-231.
25. Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N, et al (2006) A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous Southern Africans. South Afr J Sci 102: 229-38.
26. Simonis-Sueur C (2006) Morphométrie géométrique appliquée à la compréhension de la variabilité craniofaciale des homo sapiens adultes. Musée national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, 348 p.
27. O'Higgins P, Jones N (1998) Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J Anat 193: 251-72.
28. Klingenberg CP (2008) MorphoJ. http://www. flywings. org. uk/MorphoJ_page. htm, faculty of life sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
29. Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS (1998) Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 1363-75.
30. Von Cramon-Taubadel N, Frazier BC, Lahr MM (2007) The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods and modifications. Am J Phys Anthropol 134: 24-35.
31. Bookstein FL (1990) Introduction to methods for landmark data. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. The University of Michigan museum of zoology, Ann Arbor, pp 215-25.
32. Neff NA, Marcus LF (1980) A survey of multivariate methods for systematics. American Museum of Natural History, New York, 243 p.
33. Baylac M (1996) Morphométrie géométrique et systématique. Biosystema 14: 73-89.
34. Moss ML, Young RW (1960) A functional approach to craniology. Am J Phys Anthropol 18: 281-92.
35. Moss ML (1997) The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112: 8-11.
36. Moss ML (1997) The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112: 221-6.
37. Moss ML (1997) The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. Genomic thesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112: 338-42.
38. Moss ML (1997) The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and resolving synthesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112: 410-7.
39. Moss ML (2007) The differential roles of periosteal and capsular functional matrices in orofacial growth. Eur J Orthod 29: 96-101.
40. van der Klaauw CJ (1946) Cerebral skull and facial skull. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie 7: 16-37.
41. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, et al (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston, 443 p.
42. Klingenberg CP, Monteiro LR (2005) Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: implications for morphometric applications. Syst Biol 54: 678-88.
43. Monteiro LR (1999) Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst Biol 48: 192-9.
44. Gidaszewski NA, Baylac M, Klingenberg CP (2009) Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophilia melanogaster subgroup. BMC Evol Biol 9: 110-20.
45. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Pizzini G, et al (1993) Sexual dimorphism in the human face assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis. J Anat 183: 593-600.
46. Enlow DH, Hans MG (1996) Essentials of facial growth. Saunders, Philadelphia, 303 p.
47. Samal A, Subramani V, Marx D (2007) Analysis of sexual dimorphism in human face l. Vis Commun Image Represent 18: 453-63.
48. Roessli DC (1998) Approche morphométrique dans l'étude de la perception et de la reconnaissance du visage humain. Université de Genève, Genève, 258 p.
49. Bruce V, Young A (1998) In the eye of the beholder, the science of face perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 280 p.
50. Macaluso JP (2010) Metric sex determination from the basal region of the occipital bone in a documented French sample. Bull Soc Anthropol Paris (DOI 10. 1007/s13219-010-0023-x) [sous presse].
51. Tian S, Nishida Y, Isberg B, et al (2000) MRI measurements of normal extraocular muscles and other orbital structures. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophtalmol 238: 393-404.
52. Farkas LG, Posnick JC (1992) Growth and development of regional units in the head and face based on anthropometric measurements. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 29: 301-29.
53. Pretorius E, Steyn M, Scholtz Y (2006) Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism. Am J Phys Anthropol 129: 64-70.
54. Rosas A, Bastir M (2002) Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. Am J Phys Anthropol 117: 236-45.
55. Lahr MM, Wright RVS (1996) The question of robusticity and the relationship between cranial size and shape in homo sapiens. J Hum Evol 31: 157-91.
56. Félizet GM (1873) Recherches anatomiques et expérimentales sur les fractures du crâne. De La Haye A (ed), Paris, 167 p.
57. Ferré JC, Chevalier C, Robert R, et al (1989) Reflections on the mechanical structure of the base of the skull and on the face - Part 2: Discussion, current concepts and theories. Surg Radiol Anat 11: 135-40.
58. Friess M (1999) Taille et conformation crânienne chez les hominidés de la fin du Pléistocène. BAR International Series 799, Oxford, 241 p.
59. Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D (2008) Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 53: 54-7.
60. Good CD, Johnsrude I, Ashburner J, et al (2001) Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14: 685-700.
61. Kobyliansky E, Livshits G (1989) Age dependent changes in morphometrics and biochemical traits. Ann Hum Biol 16: 237-47.
62. Captier G, Lethuilier J, Oussaid M, et al (2006) Neural symmetry and functional asymmetry of the mandible. Surg Radiol Anat 28: 379-86.
63. Hennessy RJ, Lane A, Kinsella A, et al (2006) 3D morphometrics of craniofacial dysmorphology reveals sex-specific asymmetries in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 67: 261-8.
64. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Ciusa V, et al (2001) The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59: 382-8.
65. Koehler N, Simmons LW, Rhodes M, et al (2004) The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry. Proc R Soc B 271: 233-6.
66. Richtsmeier JT, Cole TM, Lele SR (2005) An invariant approach to the study of fluctuating asymmetry: developmental instability in a mouse model for Down syndrome. In: Slice DE (ed) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, Chicago, IL, pp 187-212.
67. Endo B (1970) Analysis of stress around the orbit due to masseter and temporalis muscles respectively. J Anthropol Soc Nippon 78: 251-66.
68. Monticelli F, Graw M (2008) Investigation on the reliability of determining sex from the human os zygomaticum. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 4: 181-6.