Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs

Veterinary Ophthalmology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 169-173

  Park, Young Woo ^a   Jeong, Man Bok ^a   Kim, Tae Hyun ^a   Ahn, Jae Sang ^a   Ahn, Jeong Taek ^a   Park, Shin Ae ^a,b   Kim, Se Eun ^a   Seo, Kangmoon ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Applanation tonometer; Central corneal thickness; Dogs; Intraocular pressure; Pachymeter; Rebound tonometer

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CORNEA; DOG; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CORNEA; DOGS; FEMALE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 79955417271     PISSN: 14635216     EISSN: 14635224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2010.00859.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gum GG, Gelatt KN, Esson DW. Physiology of the Eye. In: Veterinary Ophthalmology, 4th edn. (ed. Gelatt KN) Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, 2007; 160-170.
2. Gelatt KN, Brooks DE, Kallberg ME. The Canine Glaucoma. In: Veterinary Ophthalmology, 4th edn (ed. Gelatt KN). Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, 2007; 762-763.
3. Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Survey of Ophthalmology 2008; 53: 203-218.
4. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134: 221-242.
5. Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Journal of Glaucoma 2008; 17: 619-625.
6. Zeng Y, Guo X, Lin J et al. Effect of tear film changes on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applantion tonometer. Yan Ke Xue Bao 2008; 24: 27-29.
7. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Archives of Ophthalmology 2006; 124: 471-476.
8. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K et al. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. Journal of Glaucoma 2007; 16: 581-588.
9. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Survey of Ophthalmology 1993; 38: 1-30.
10. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmologica 1975; 53: 34-43.
11. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006; 90: 833-835.
12. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S et al. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2002; 43: 1389-1392.
13. Knollinger AM, La Croix NC, Barrett PM et al. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2005; 227: 244-248.
14. Gorig C, Coenen RT, Stades FC et al. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2006; 67: 134-144.
15. Leiva M, Naranjo C, Pena MT. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2006; 9: 17-21.
16. Kniestedt C, Punjabi O, Lin S et al. Tonometry through the ages. Survey of Ophthalmology 2008; 53: 568-591.
17. Sahin A, Basmak H, Yildirim N. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children. Journal of Glaucoma 2008; 17: 57-61.
18. ® applanation tonometer in dogs. Transactions of the European College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists (abstract)2004; 126.
19. Priehs DR, Gum GG, Whitley RD et al. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1990; 51: 1547-1550.
20. Lynch GL, Brinkis JL. The effect of elective phacofragmentation on central corneal thickness in the dog. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 2006; 9: 303-310.
21. Gerding PA Jr, McLaughlin SA, Brightman AH et al. Effects of intracameral injection of viscoelastic solutions on corneal endothelium in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1990; 51: 1086-1088.
22. Chandler MJ, Moore PA, Dietrich UM et al. Effects of transcorneal iridal photocoagulation on the canine corneal endothelium using a diode laser. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2003; 6: 197-203.
23. Gelatt KN, Gum GG, Barrie KP. Diurnal variations in intraocular pressure in normotensive and glaucomatous Beagles. Journal of Glaucoma 1981; 3: 121-124.
24. Greller AL, Hoffman AR, Liu C et al. Effects of the topically applied calcium-channel blocker flunarizine on intraocular pressure in clinically normal dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2008; 69: 273-278.
25. Johnson M, Kass MA, Moses RA et al. Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. Archives of Ophthalmology 1978; 96: 664-665.
26. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS et al. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2005; 46: 409-414.
27. Gilger BC, Whitley RD, McLaughlin SA et al. Canine corneal thickness measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1991; 52: 1570-1572.
28. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
29. Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2009; 148: 4-6.
30. Dziezyc J, Millichamp NJ, Smith WB. Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1992; 201: 430-433.
31. Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ et al. Clinical comparison of the Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen applanation tonometers in dogs. Progress in Veterinary and Comparative Ophthalmology 1991; 1: 171-176.
32. Passaglia CL, Guo X, Chen J et al. Tono-Pen XL calibration curves for cats, cows and sheep. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2004; 7: 261-264.