Can we track holes?

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1013-1021

  Horowitz, Todd S ^a   Kuzmova, Yoana ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Holes; Multiple object tracking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955143882     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albrecht A.R., List A., Robertson L.C. Attentional selection and the representation of holes and objects. JOV 2008, 8(13):8.1-10.
2. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37(3):379-384.
3. Bertamini M. Who owns the contour of a visual hole?. Perception 2006, 35(7):883-894.
4. Bertamini M., Croucher C.J. The shape of holes. Cognition 2003, 87(1):33-54.
5. Bertamini M., Hulleman J. Amodal completion and visual holes (static and moving). Acta Psychologica 2006, 123(1-2):55-72.
6. Bertamini M., Lawson R. Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure. Percept Psychophys 2006, 68(5):776-791.
7. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:443-446.
8. Caplovitz G.P., Tse P.U. The bar-cross-ellipse illusion: Alternating percepts of rigid and nonrigid motion based on contour ownership and trackable feature assignment. Perception 2006, 35(7):993-997.
9. Cavanagh P., Alvarez G.A. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(7):349-354.
10. Chen L. Topological structure in visual perception. Science 1982, 218(4573):699-700.
11. Chen V.J., Cicerone C.M. Depth from subjective color and apparent motion. Vision Research 2002, 42(18):2131-2135.
12. Chen V.J., Cicerone C.M. Subjective color from apparent motion. JOV 2002, 2(6):424-437.
13. Cousineau D. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2005, 1(1):42-45.
14. Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(2):161-177.
15. Gewirtz P. On" i know it when i see it. Yale Law Journal 1996, 105(4).
16. Horowitz T.S., Klieger S.B., Fencsik D.E., Yang K.K., Alvarez G.A., Wolfe J.M. Tracking unique objects. Perception & psychophysics 2007, 69(2):172-184.
17. Hulleman J., Humphreys G.W. Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes. Percept Psychophys 2005, 67(3):469-482.
18. Khurana B. Visual structure and the integration of form and color information. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(6):1766-1785.
19. King-Smith P.E., Grigsby S.S., Vingrys A.J., Benes S.C., Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research 1994, 34(7):885-912.
20. Lawrence, M. A. (2010). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments (Version R package version 2.1-0).
21. Makovski T., Jiang Y.V. Feature binding in attentive tracking of distinct objects. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):180-194.
22. Morey R. Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2008, 4(2):61-64.
23. Palmer S., Davis J., Nelson R., Rock I. Figure-ground effects on shape memory for objects versus holes. Perception 2008, 37(10):1569-1586.
24. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
25. Pomerantz J.R. Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(11):471-473.
26. Portilla J., Simoncelli E. A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. International Journal of Computer Vision 2000, 40(1):49-70.
27. Pylyshyn Z.W. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):127-158.
28. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 1988, 3(3):179-197.
29. Rensink R.A., Enns J.T. Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review 1995, 102(1):101-130.
30. Rensink R.A., Enns J.T. Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research 1998, 38(15-16):2489-2505.
31. Scholl B.J. What have we learned about attention from multiple object tracking (and vice versa)?. Computation, cognition, and pylyshyn 2009, 49-78. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Dedrick, L. Trick (Eds.).
32. Scholl B.J., Pylyshyn Z.W. Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 38(2):259-290.
33. Scholl B.J., Pylyshyn Z.W., Feldman J. What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):159-177.
34. St Clair R., Huff M., Seiffert A.E. Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking. JOV 2010, 10(4).
35. VanMarle K., Scholl B.J. Attentive tracking of objects versus substances. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS 2003, 14(5):498-504.
36. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics 1983, 33(2):113-120.
37. Wolfe J.M., Bennett S.C. Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research 1997, 37(1).