Attentional selection and the representation of holes and objects

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 13, 2008, Pages

  Albrecht, Alice R ^a,b,d   List, Alexandra ^a,b,c   Robertson, Lynn C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Cueing; Depth perception; Object perception; Perceptual organization

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55149100895     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.13.8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space. Visual Cognition, 8, 1-32.
2. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., Andersen, G, J., & Theeuwes, J. (1997). Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a "depth-aware" attentional focus. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 524-529.
3. Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1604-1612.
4. Ben-Shahar, O., Scholl, B. J., & Zucker, S. W. (2007). Attention, segregation, and textons: Bridging the gap between object-based attention and textonbased segregation. Vision Research, 47, 845-860.
5. Bertamini, M. (2001). The importance of being convex: An advantage for convexity when judging position. Perception, 30, 1295-1310.
6. Bertamini, M. (2006). Who owns the contour of a visual hole? Perception, 35, 883-894.
7. Bertamini, M., & Croucher, C. J. (2003). The shape of holes. Cognition, 87, 33-54.
8. Bertamini, M., & Hulleman, J. (2006). Amodal completion and visual holes (static and moving). Acta Psychologica, 123, 55-72.
9. Bertamini, M., & Lawson, R. (2006). Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 776-791.
10. Brawn, P. T., & Snowden, R. J. (2000). Attention to overlapping objects: Detection and discrimination of luminance changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 342-358.
11. Crundall, D., Cole, G. G., & Galpin, A. (2007). Object-based attention is mediated by collinearity of targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 137-153.
12. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Spreading of visual attention to modally versus amodally completed regions. Psychological Science, 8, 275-281.
13. Davis, G., Driver, J., Pavani, F., & Shepherd, A. (2000). Reappraising the apparent costs of attending to two separate visual objects. Vision Research, 40, 1323-1332.
14. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
15. Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., & Starrveldt, Y. (1994). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5, 380-383.
16. Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 496-503.
17. Hulleman, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 469-482.
18. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495-507.
19. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
20. Macquistan, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
21. Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The role of closure in defining the "objects" of object-based attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1140-1149.
22. Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005). The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 301-306.
23. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughn, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
24. Nelson, R., & Palmer, S. E. (2001). Of holes and wholes: The perception of surrounded regions. Perception, 30, 1213-1226.
25. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenom- enology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 109, 160-174.
27. Pratt, J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
28. Robertson, L. C., & Kim, M. S. (1999). Effects of perceived space on spatial attention. Psychological Science, 10, 76-79.
29. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Obje s and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
30. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247-253.
31. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
32. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver; and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.