Figure-ground effects on shape memory for objects versus holes

Perception

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1569-1586

  Palmer, Stephen ^a   Davis, Janet ^b   Nelson, Rolf ^c   Rock, Irvin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DREW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WHEATON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55249127316     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p5838     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bertamini M, Croucher E H, 2003 "The shapes of holes" Cognition 87 33-54
2. Bertamini M, Mosca F, 2004 "Early computation of contour curvature and part structure: Evidence from holes" Perception 33 35-48
3. Casati R, Varzi A C, 1994 Holes and Other Superficialities (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
4. Hulleman J, Humphreys G W, 2004 "A new cue to figure-ground coding: Top-bottom polarity" Vision Research 44 2779-2791
5. Hulleman J, Humphreys G W, 2005 "The difference between searching amongst objects and searching amongst holes" Perception & Psychophysics 67 469-482
6. Kanizsa G, Gerbino W, 1976 "Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization", in Vision and Artifact Ed. M Henle (New York: Springer) pp 25-32
7. Nelson R, Palmer S E, 2001 "Of holes and wholes: The perception of surrounded regions" Perception 30 1213-1226
8. Nelson R, Thierman J, Palmer S E, in press, "Shape memory for intrinsic versus accidental holes" Perception & Psychophysics
9. Palmer S E, 1999 Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press)
10. Palmer S E, Brooks J L, in press, "Edge-texture grouping in depth perception and figure-ground organization" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
11. Palmer S E, Ghose T, 2006 "Extremal edges dominate other cues to figure-ground and depth perception", paper presented at 6th Annual Meeting of the Vision Science Society, Sarasota, FL, May
12. Peterson M A, 2003 "On figures, grounds, and varieties of amodal surface completion", in Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives Eds R Kimchi, M Behrman, C Olson (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 87-116
13. Peterson M A, Gibson B S, 1993 "Shape recognition inputs to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional grounds" Cognitive Psychology 25 383-429
14. Rock I, 1973 Orientation and Form (New York: Academic Press)
15. Rock I, DiVita J, 1987 "A case of viewer-centered object perception" Cognitive Psychology 19 280-293
16. Rock I, Engelstein P, 1959 "A study of memory for visual form" American Journal of Psychology 72 221-229
17. Rubin E, 1921 Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren (Copenhagen: Gyldendals)
18. Subirana-Vilanova J B, Richards W, 1996 "Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma" Vision Research 36 1493-1501
19. Thierman J, Vecera S P, Palmer S E, 2006 "Reference frames in figure-ground organization", paper presented at the 6th Annual meeting of the Vision Science Society, Sarasota, FL
20. Vecera S P, 2004 "The reference frame of figure-ground assignment" Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 909-915
21. Vecera S P, Palmer S E, 2006 "Grounding the figure: Contextual effects of depth planes on figure-ground organization" Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 563-569
22. Vecera S P, Vogel E K, Woodman G F, 2002 "Lower region: A new cue to figure-ground segregation" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 194-205