Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Conrad, Verena ^a   Bartels, Andreas ^a,b   Kleiner, Mario ^a   Noppeney, Uta ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambiguous stimuli; Audiovisual; Binocular rivalry; Cross modal; Motion perception; Multisensory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955142913     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.10.27     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adam, R., & Noppeney, U. (2010). Prior auditory information shapes visual category selectivity in ventraloccipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage, May 7, Epub ahead of print.
2. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. 185-194.
3. Alais, D., Parker, A., Boxtel, J., Paffen, C., & van Ee, R. (2007). Attending to auditory signals slows binocular rivalry. Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
4. Albright, T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 1106-1130.
5. Arjen, A., Singer, W., & Muckli, L. (2008). Capture of auditory motion by vision is represented by an activation shift from auditory to visual motion cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2690-2697.
6. Bartels, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (in revision). Rivalry: A time dependence of monocular and percept contributions.
7. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
8. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
9. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & James, T. W. (2004). Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychological Science, 15, 397-402.
10. Blake, R., Westerndorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
11. Blauert, J. (1983). Spatial hearing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bossink, C. J. H., Stalmeier, P. F. M., & de Weert, C. M. M. (1993). A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 33, 1413-1419.
13. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
14. Brascamp, J.W., vanEe, R.,Noest,A. J., Jacobs, R. H. A. H., & van den Berg, A. V. (2006). The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision, 6(11):8, 1244-1256, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/11/8, doi:10.1167/6.11.8.
15. Breese, B. (1909). Binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 16, 410-415.
16. Bremmer, F., Schlack, A., Shah, N. J., Zafiris, O., Kubischik, M., Hoffmann, K. P., et al. (2001). Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: A human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron, 29, 287-296.
17. Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1993). Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Visual Neuroscience, 10, 1157-1169.
18. Bruno, N., Jacomuzzi, A. C., Bertamini, M., & Meyer, G. (2007). A visual
19. Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (Eds.) (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Celebrini, S., & Newsome, W. T. (1994). Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 4109-4124.
21. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 1794-1803.
22. Chong, S. C., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(11):6, 1004-1012, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/11/6, doi:10.1167/5.11.6.
23. Dayan, P. (1998). A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation, 10, 1119-1135.
24. Ecker, A. J., & Heller, L. M. (2005). Auditory-visual interactions in the perception of a ball's path. Perception, 34, 59-75.
25. Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N., & Ladavas, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 332-343.
26. Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. J. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition, 108, 687-701.
27. Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception, 34, 803-822.
28. Kang, M.-S., & Blake, R. (2005). Perceptual synergy between seeing and hearing revealed during binocular rivalry. Psichologija, 32, 7-15.
29. Kayser, C., Petkov, C. I., & Logothetis, N. K. (2008). Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1560-1574.
30. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
31. Lack, L. (1978). Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
32. Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., Maldijan, J. H., Burdette, J. H., & Wallace, M. T. (2004). Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioural performance. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 405-414.
33. Lecuona, A. R., & Canadas-Quesada, F. J. (2009). Interference of auditory information with haptic perception of stiffness in virtual reality. In M. Redondo, C. Bravo, & M. Ortega (Eds.), Engineering the user interface: From research to practice (pp. 41-51). London, UK: Springer.
34. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264.
35. Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology, 57, 225-238.
36. Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). On binocular rivalry. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
37. Maeda, F., Kanai, R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion. Current Biology, 14, R990.
38. Maier, J. X., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2007). Looming biases in monkey auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4093-4100.
39. Maruya, K., Yang, E., & Blake, R. (2007). Voluntary action influences visual competition. Psychological Science, 18, 1090-1098.
40. Mateef, S., Hohnsbein, J., & Noack, T. (1985). Dynamic visual capture: Apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target. Perception, 14, 721-727.
41. Maunsell, J. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1127-1147.
42. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7):2, 539-551, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/7/2, doi:10.1167/4.7.2.
43. Meyer, G. F., & Wuerger, S. (2001). Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport, 12, 2557-2600.
44. Meyer, G. F., Wuerger, S. M., Röhrbein, F., & Zetzsche, C. (2005). Low-level integration of auditory and visual spatial colocalisation. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 538-547.
45. Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: A high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 452-465.
46. Moutoussis, K., Keliris, G., Kourtzi, Z., & Logothetis, N. K. (2005). A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Research, 45, 2231-2243.
47. Mueller, T. J., & Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 223-232.
48. Noppeney, U., Josephs, O., Hocking, J., Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008). The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 598-609.
49. Noppeney, U., Ostwald, D., & Werner, S. (2010). Perceptual decisions formed by accumulation of audio-visual evidence in prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 7434-7446.
50. Open, AL. (2005). http://connect.creativelabs.com/openal/Documentation/OpenAL%201.1%20Specification.pdf
51. Paffen, C. L., Alais, D., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science, 17, 752-756.
52. Paffen, C. L., van der Smagt, M. J., te Pas, S. F., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual processing. Journal of Vision, 5(6):8, 571-578, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/6/8, doi:10.1167/5.6.8.
53. Parker, A. L., & Alais, D. M. (2006). Auditory modulation of binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(6):855, 855a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/6/855, doi:10.1167/6.6.855.
54. Pastukhov, A., & Braun, J. (2007). Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. Journal of Vision, 7(10):5, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/10/5, doi:10.1167/7.10.5.
55. Perrin, X., Chavarriaga, R., Ray, C., Siegwart, R., & Milan, J. del R. (2008). A comparative psychophysical and EEG study of different feedback modalities for HRI. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human
56. Rees, G., Friston, K., & Koch, C. (2000). A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 716-723.
57. Sadaghiani, S., Maier, J. X., & Noppeney, U. (2009). Natural, metaphoric and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 6490-6499.
58. Schroeder, C. E., & Foxe, J. J. (2005). Multisensory contributions to low-level, "unisensory" processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 454-458.
59. Seifritz, E., Neuhoff, J. G., Bilecen, D., Scheffler, K., Mustovic, H., Schächinger, H., et al. (2002). Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain. Current Biology, 12, 2147-2151.
60. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152.
61. Sobel, K. V., & Blake, R. (2002). How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception, 31, 813-824.
62. Soto-Faraco, S., Kingstone, A., & Spence, C. (2003). Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1847-1862.
63. Soto-Faraco, S., Lyons, J., Gazzaniga, M., Spence, C., & Kingstone, A. (2002). The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 139-146.
64. Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Moving multisensory research along: Motion perception across sensory modalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 29-32.
65. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
66. van Ee, R., van Boxtel, J. J. A., Parker, A., & Alais, D. (2009). Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11641-11647.
67. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research, 45, 41-55.
68. Walker, P., & Powell, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research, 19, 247-249.
69. Weissman, D. H., Warner, L. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2004). The neural mechanisms for minimizing crossmodal distraction. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10941-10949.
70. Werner, S., & Noppeney, U. (2010). Superadditive responses in superior temporal sulcus predict audiovisual benefits in object categorization. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1829-1842.
71. Wolf, M., & Hochstein, S. (2007). High-level effects in binocular rivalry. Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
72. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.