Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual motion processing

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 571-578

  Paffen, Chris L E ^a   van der Smagt, Maarten J ^a   te Pas, Susan F ^a   Verstraten, Frans A J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Center surround interactions; Motion perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST; DIRECTIONAL VISION; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MONOCULAR VISION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 27244432241     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/5.6.8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1998). Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 38, 637-644.
2. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 4341-4353.
3. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Allman, J. M., Miezin, F. M., & McGuinness, E. (1985). Direction and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception, 14, 105-126.
5. Anstis, S., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Mather, G. (1998). The motion after effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 111-117.
6. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 4-11.
7. Born, R. T., & Tootell, R. B. H. (1992). Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature, 357, 497-499.
8. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
9. Carter, O. L., Campbell, T. G., Liu, G. B., & Wallis, G. (2004). Contradictory influence of context on predominance during binocular rivalry. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 87, 153-162.
10. Eifuku, S., & Wurtz, R. H. (1998). Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTI: Center-surround interactions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 282-296.
11. Felleman, D. J., & Kaas, J. H. (1984). Receptive-field properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area (MT) of Owl monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 488-513.
12. Fukuda, H., & Blake, R. (1992). Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-370.
13. Georgeson, M. A., & Shackleton, T. M. (1989). Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception. Vision Research, 29, 1511-1523.
14. Gilbert, C. D., & Wiesel, T. N. (1990). The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Research, 30, 1689-1701.
15. Hartline, H. K., & Graham, C. H. (1932). Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye. Journal of Cell Computation and Physiology, 1, 277-295.
16. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
17. Hupé, J. M., James, A. C., Payne, B. R., Lomber, S. G., Girard, P., & Bullier, J. (1998). Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons. Nature, 394, 784-787.
18. Jones, H. E., Grieve, K. L., Wang, W., & Sillito, A. M. (2001). Surround suppression in primate VI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2011-2028.
19. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1992). Second order optic flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 530-538.
20. Lamme, V. A. F. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605-1615.
21. Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
22. Meng, X., Chen, Y., & Qian, N. (2004). Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry. Vision Research, 44, 45-55.
23. Nakayama, K., & Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception, 3, 63-80.
24. Pack, C. C., Hunter, J. N., & Born, R. T. (2005). Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1809-1815.
25. Paffen, C. L. E., te Pas, S. F., Kanai, R., van der Smagt, M. J., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2004). Vision Research, 44, 1635-1639.
26. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
27. Raiguel, S. E., van Hulle, M. M., Xiao, D. K., Marcar, V. L., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Shape and spatial distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surround in the middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2064-2082.
28. Sobel, K. V., & Blake, R. (2002). How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception, 31, 813-824.
29. Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2003). Perceptual consequences of center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature, 424, 312-315.
30. Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Saito, H., Yukie, M., Fukada, Y., & Iwai, E. (1986). Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 134-144.
31. Takeuchi, T., & De Valois, K. K. (2000). Modulation of perceived contrast by a moving surround. Vision Research, 40, 2697-2709.
32. De Weert, C. M., & Wade, N. J. (1984). Canceling of pattern motion: Dichoptic and monoptic observations. Vision Research, 24, 883-887.
33. Warren, W. H. (1995). Self-motion: Visual perception and visual control. Handbook of perception and cognition Vol. 5: Perception of space and motion (pp. 263-325). Los Angeles: Academic Press.
34. Wiesel, T. N., Hubel, D. H., & Lam, D. M. (1974). Autoradiographic demonstration of ocular-dominance columns in the monkey striate cortex by means of transneuronal transport. Brain Research, 79, 273-279.