What matters most? the perceived importance of ability and personality for hiring decisions

Cornell Hospitality Quarterly

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 94-101

  Tews, Michael J ^a   Stafford, Kathryn ^b   Tracey, J Bruce ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c 335 Statler Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

general mental ability; hiring decisions; personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955089570     PISSN: 19389655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1938965510363377     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aiman-Smith, L., S.E. Scullen, and S.H. Barr. 2002. Conducting studies of decision making in organizational context: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organizational Research Methods 5:388-414.
2. Bergman, M.E., M.A. Donovan, F. Drasgow, R.C. Overton, and J.B. Henning. 2008. Test of Motowidlo et al.'s (1997) theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 21:227-53.
3. Carbonara, P. 1996. Hire for attitude, train for skill. Fast Company 4:73-81.
4. Cooksey, R.W. 1996. The methodology of social judgment theory. Thinking & Reasoning 2:141-71.
5. Costa, P.T., and R.R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
6. Dunn, W.S., M.K. Mount, M.R. Barrick, and D.S. Ones. 1995. Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology 80:500-509.
7. Gosling, S.D., P.J. Rentfrow, and W.B. Swann. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37:504-28.
8. Gottfredson, L.S. 1997. Intelligence and social policy. Intelligence 24:1-12.
9. Gottfredson, L.S. 2004. Schools and the g factor. The Wilson Quarterly, Summer, pp. 35-45.
10. Hunter, J.E. 1986. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 29:340-62.
11. Hunter, J.E., and R.F. Hunter. 1984. Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin 96:72-98.
12. Hunter, J.E., and F.L. Schmidt. 1996. Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2:447-72.
13. Hurtz, G.M., and J.J. Donovan. 2000. Personality and job-performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 85:869-79.
14. Karren, R.J., and M.W. Barringer. 2002. A review and analysis of the policy-capturing methodology in organizational research: Guidelines for research and practice. Organizational Research Methods 5:337-61.
15. Liao, H., and A. Chuang. 2004. A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 47:41-58.
16. McDaniel, M., Morgeson, F.P., Finnegan, E.B., Campion, M.A., and Braverman, E.P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740.
17. Motowidlo, S.J., W.C. Borman, and M.J. Schmit. 1997. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 10:71-83.
18. Ree, M.J., and J.A. Earles. 1992. Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1:86-89.
19. Ree, M.J., J.A. Earles, and M.S. Teachout. 1994. Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology 79:518-24.
20. Rynes, S.L., K.G. Brown, and A.F. Colbert. 2002. Seven common misconceptions about human resource practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs. Academy of Management Executive 16:92-103.
21. Salgado, J.F., & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 299-324.
22. Schmidt, F.L. 2002. The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance 15:187-210.
23. Schmidt, F.L., and J.E. Hunter. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124: 262-74.
24. Schmitt, N., and D. Chan. 1998. Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Schmitt, N., R.Z. Gooding, R.A. Noe, and M. Kirsch. 1984. Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology 37:407-22.
26. Solomon, M.R., C. Surprenant, J.A. Czepiel, and E.G. Gutman. 1985. A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. Journal of Marketing 49:99-111.
27. Tews, M.J., K. Stafford., and J. Zhu. 2009. Beauty revisited: The impact of attractiveness, ability, and personality in the assessment of employment suitability. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17:92-100.
28. Tracey, J.B., M.C. Sturman, and M.J. Tews. 2007. Ability versus personality: Factors that predict employee job performance. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 48:313-22.
29. Wonderlic, Inc. (1999), Wonderlic personnel test & scholastic level exam user's manual, Libertyville, IL: Author.