Fostering innovation implementation: Findings about supporting scale from GLOBE

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 168-174

  Fishman, Barry J ^a   Penuel, William R ^b   Yamaguchi, Ryoko ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c ABT ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES; HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELING; INNOVATION IMPLEMENTATION; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; RESOURCE PROVISIONS; SCIENCE EDUCATION; TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 79955076940     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
3. Coleman, E. B., & Penuel, W. R. (2000). Web-based student assessment for program evaluation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(4), 327-342.
4. Dede, C. (in press). Scaling up: Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Desimone, L., & Carlson Le Floch, K. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve survey results in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1-22.
6. Desimone, L., & Porter, A. C. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers? Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1265-1312.
7. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
8. Fishman, B. (2005). Adapting innovations to particular contexts of use: A collaborative framework. In C. Dede, J. Honan & L. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation (pp. 48-66). New York: Jossey-Bass.
9. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
10. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C, Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
11. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Culp, K. M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313-329.
13. Kennedy, M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development (NISE Brief No. 3(2)). Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Science Education.
14. Means, B., Penuel, W. R., Korbak, C, Lewis, A., Rollins, J., & Yarnall, L. (2000). GLOBE Year 5 evaluation: Classroom practices. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15. Penuel, W. R., Korbak, C, Lewis, A., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Yarnall, L. (2002). GLOBE Year 7 evaluation: Exploring student research and inquiry in GLOBE. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
16. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Second ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
17. Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387-431.
19. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Leuhmann, A., & Barab, S. A. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489.
20. Tyack, D. B., & Tobin, W. (1994). The 'grammar' of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453-479.