Low-osmolar monomeric versus iso-osmolar dimeric contrast media: An intra-individual comparison in CT angiography using an animal model

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 170-175

  Behrendt, Florian F ^a,b   Pietsch, Hubertus ^c   Jost, Gregor ^c   Keil, Sebastian ^a   Mottaghy, Felix M ^b   Günther, Rolf W ^a   Mahnken, Andreas H ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^c BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

arteries; contrast agents intravenous; CT angiography; vascular

Indexed keywords

IODINE; IODIXANOL; IOPROMIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AORTA; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; IOHEXOL; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 79955070983     PISSN: 17549477     EISSN: 17549485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02247.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Behrendt FF, Mahnken AH, Stanzel S, et al,. Intraindividual comparison of contrast media concentrations for combined abdominal and thoracic MDCT. AJR 2008; 191: 145-50. (Pubitemid 351955219)
2. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, et al,. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 349-53. (Pubitemid 44406197)
3. Muhlenbruch G, Behrendt FF, Eddahabi MA, et al,. Which iodine concentration in chest CT?-a prospective study in 300 patients. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2826-32.
4. Rist C, Nikolaou K, Kirchin MA, et al,. Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography: comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400 milligrams of iodine per milliliter. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 460-7. (Pubitemid 44284194)
5. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, et al,. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007 42: 856-61. (Pubitemid 350126568)
6. Tsai IC, Lee T, Tsai WL, et al,. Contrast enhancement in cardiac MDCT: comparison of iodixanol 320 versus iohexol 350. AJR 2008; 190: W47-53.
7. Pannu HK, Thompson RE, Phelps J, Magee CA, Fishman EK,. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 576-84. (Pubitemid 40613053)
8. Behrendt FF, Pietsch H, Jost G, et al,. Intra-individual comparison of different contrast media concentrations (300 mg, 370 mg and 400 mg iodine) in MDCT. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1644-50.
9. Prokop M,. Multislice CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36: 86-96.
10. Benner T, Heiland S, Erb G, Forsting M, Sartor K,. Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 307-17. (Pubitemid 27274255)
11. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD 3rd, Miller WJ,. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 1994; 190: 721-5. (Pubitemid 24071037)
12. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD 3rd, Miller WJ, Confer SR,. Hepatic CT enhancement: A method to demonstrate reproducibility. Radiology 1993; 188: 627-31. (Pubitemid 23254574)
13. Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, et al,. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2004; 233: 682-8.
14. Romano L, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, et al,. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 204-11.
15. Kishimoto M, Doi S, Shimizu J, et al,. Influence of osmolarity of contrast medium and saline flush on computed tomography angiography: comparison of monomeric and dimeric iodinated contrast media with different iodine concentrations at an identical iodine delivery rate. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76: 135-9.
16. Liss P, Persson PB, Hansell P, Lagerqvist B,. Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 1811-17. (Pubitemid 44684813)
17. Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al,. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 2912-20. (Pubitemid 350058398)
18. Heinrich MC, Haberle L, Muller V, Bautz W, Uder M,. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology 2009; 250: 68-86.
19. Reed M, Meier P, Tamhane UU, Welch KB, Moscucci M, Gurm HS,. The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 645-54.