Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: A multicenter study of 333 cases

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Qiu, Guixing ^a   Qiu, Yong ^b   Zhu, Zezhang ^b   Liu, Zhen ^b   Song, Yuemin ^c   Hai, Yong ^d   Luo, Zhuojing ^e   Liu, Zude ^f   Zhang, Hongqi ^g   Lv, Guohua ^h   Wang, Yipeng ^a   Zhang, Jianguo ^a   Shen, Jianxiong ^a   Sun, Xu ^b  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b MEDICAL SCHOOL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^g CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^h CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chinese adaptation; outcome analysis; questionnaire; scoliosis; SRS 22

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CHINA; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RURAL AREA; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22 PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL STATUS;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHILD; CHINA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; TRANSLATING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955060538     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0485e     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-center study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40. (Pubitemid 29331416)
2. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9. (Pubitemid 36070775)
3. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28: 74-8.
4. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:473-8. (Pubitemid 43361749)
5. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3. (Pubitemid 36070776)
6. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-8. (Pubitemid 41567613)
7. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29:1676-80. (Pubitemid 39014848)
8. Monticone M, Carabalona R, Negrini S. Reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (Italian version) in mild adolescent vertebral deformities. Eur Med Phys 2004;40:191-7. (Pubitemid 39424577)
9. Hashimoto H, Sase T, Arai Y, et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine 2007;32:E141-6.
10. Glowacki M, Misterska E, Laurentowska M, et al. Polish adaptation of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:1060-5.
11. Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, et al. Validity and reliability of an adapted German version of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:818-21.
12. Beauséjour M, Joncas J, Goulet L, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted French Canadian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec. Spine 2009;34: 623-8.
13. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:705-9. (Pubitemid 40388657)
14. Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, Alanay A, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2007;32:1141-5. (Pubitemid 46685996)
15. Li M, Wang CF, Gu SX, et al. Adapted simplifi ed Chinese (mainland) version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:1321-4.
16. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91. (Pubitemid 32042951)
17. Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:259-63. (Pubitemid 36399113)
18. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refi nement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire function domain. Spine 2006;31:593-7.
19. Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000;25(24):3167-77. (Pubitemid 32042949)
20. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130-9.
21. Zborowski M. Cultural components in response to pain. J Soc Issues 1952;8:16-30.
22. Davis BD. Cultural dimensions of pain. In: Carter B, ed. Perspectives on Pain. 1st ed. London, United Kingdom: Arnold; 1998: 65-83.
23. Kosko DA, Flaskerud JH. Mexican American, nurse practitioner, and lay control group beliefs about cause and treatment of chest pain. Nurs Res 1987;36:226-31.
24. Vitale MG, Levy DE, Johnson MG, et al. Assessment of quality of life in adolescent patients with orthopaedic problems: are adult measures appropriate? J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:622-8. (Pubitemid 32801778)