Accuracy of reformatted CT image for measuring the pre-implant site: Analysis of the image distortion related to the gantry angle change

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 273-277

  Choi, S C ^a,c   Ann, C H ^a   Choi, H M ^b   Heo, M S ^a   Lee, S S ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Research Institute of Oral Sciences   (South Korea)

^c School of Dentistry   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Image processing, computer assisted; Tomography scanners, X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GANTRY ANGLE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISTORTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE ANGLE; MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTION; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT POSITIONING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; ALGORITHM; BODY POSTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; POSTURE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0036653031     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600702     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Quirynen M, Lamoral Y, Dekeyser C, Peene P, van Steenberghe D. Bonte J et al. The CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 384-389.
2. Abrahams JJ. The role of diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Radiol Clin North Am 1993; 31: 163-180.
3. Smith JP, Borrow JW. Reformatted CT imaging for implant planning. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1991; 3: 805-825.
4. Preda L, Di Maggio EM, Dore R, La Fianza A, Solcia M, Schifino MR et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 327-331.
5. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, Rhodes M. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33: 555-597.
6. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero O, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1243-1249.
7. Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 268-283.
8. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 96-103.
9. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 229-238.
10. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 40-42.
11. Lam EWN, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 42-46.
12. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral imlant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 105-111.
13. Choi SC, Choi HM, Park RJ, Lee SS, Park TW, You DS. Accuracy of CT image in measuring the mandible for implant: Effect of mandibular position and gantry angle. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1998; 28: 226-234.