ACRIN CT colonography trial: Does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?

Radiology

Volumn 259, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 435-441

  Hara, Amy K ^a   Blevins, Meridith ^b   Chen, Mei Hsiu ^c   Dachman, Abraham H ^d   Kuo, Mark D ^e   Menias, Christine O ^f   Siewert, Bettina ^g   Cheema, Jugesh I ^h   Obregon, Richard G ⁱ   Fidler, Jeff L ^j   Zimmerman, Peter ^k   Horton, Karen M ^l   Coakley, Kevin J ^m   Iyer, Revathy B ⁿ   Halvorsen Jr , Robert A ^o   Casola, Giovanna ^p   Yee, Judy ^q   Herman, Benjamin A ^c   Johnson, C Daniel ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^e Scottsdale Medical Imaging   (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h Evansville Radiology   (United States)

ⁱ Radiology Imaging Associates   (United States)

^j MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^k UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^l JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^m Clinical Radiologists SC   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^o VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^p UCSD MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^q VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79955014014     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11100250     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Johnson CD , Chen MH , Toledano AY , et al Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers N Engl J Med 2008 ; 359 ( 12 ): 1207-1217
2. Pickhardt PJ , Choi JR , Hwang I , et al Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 2003 ; 349 ( 23 ): 2191-2200 (Pubitemid 37485135)
3. Johnson CD , Toledano AY , Herman BA , et al Computerized tomographic colonography: Performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting Gastroenterology 2003 ; 125 ( 3 ): 688-695 (Pubitemid 37070687)
4. Rockey DC , Paulson E , Niedzwiecki D , et al Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: Prospective comparison Lancet 2005 ; 365 ( 9456 ): 305-311 (Pubitemid 40139107)
5. Cotton PB , Durkalski VL , Pineau BC , et al Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia JAMA 2004 ; 291 ( 14 ): 1713-1719 (Pubitemid 38489893)
6. Summers RM , Frentz SM , Liu J , et al Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: Visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height Acad Radiol 2009 ; 16 ( 1 ): 4-14
7. Petrick N , Haider M , Summers RM , et al CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: Observer performance study Radiology 2008 ; 246 ( 1 ): 148-156 (Pubitemid 350305038)
8. Johnson CD , Manduca A , Fletcher JG , et al Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: Performance with and without electronic stool subtraction AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 ; 190 ( 2 ): 361-366 (Pubitemid 351196606)
9. Pickhardt PJ , Lee AD , Taylor AJ , et al Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 ; 189 ( 6 ): 1451-1456 (Pubitemid 350174811)
10. Kim SH , Lee JM , Eun HW , et al Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography Radiology 2007 ; 244 ( 3 ): 852-864
11. Johnson CD , Fletcher JG , MacCarty RL , et al Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 ; 189 ( 3 ): 672-680 (Pubitemid 47328551)
12. de Vries AH , Jensch S , Liedenbaum MH , et al Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk? Eur Radiol 2009 ; 19 ( 4 ): 941-950
13. Pickhardt PJ Missed lesions at primary 2D CT colonography: Further support for 3D polyp detection [letter] Radiology 2008; 246(2):648-649
14. Dachman AH. Response. Radiology 2008; 246(2):649
15. Slater A , Taylor SA , Tam E , et al Reader error during CT colonography: Causes and implications for training Eur Radiol 2006 ; 16 ( 10 ): 2275-2283 (Pubitemid 44349876)
16. Gluecker TM , Fletcher JG , Welch TJ , et al Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 ; 182 ( 4 ): 881-889 (Pubitemid 38391647)
17. Fletcher JG , Chen MH , Herman BA , et al Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? lessons from the National CT Colonography Trial AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 ; 195 ( 1 ): 117-125