Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk?

European Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 941-950

  de Vries, Ayso H ^a   Jensch, Sebastiaan ^a,b   Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   Florie, Jasper ^a   Nio, Chung Y ^a   Truyen, Roel ^c   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Fockens, Paul ^a   Baak, Lubbertus C ^b   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon; Colonoscopy; Computer aided detection; CT colonography; Flat lesions; Virtual

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 62649175770     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1215-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570-1595
2. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129:1832-1844
3. Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22:963-979
4. Jerebko AK, Summers RM, Malley JD, Franaszek M, Johnson CD (2003) Computer-assisted detection of colonic polyps with CT colonography using neural networks and binary classification trees. Med Phys 30:52-60
5. Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS et al (2004) Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:318-326
6. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD (2001) Complementary role of computer-aided diagnosis for detecting colonic polyps with CT colonography. Radiology 120:391-399
7. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2006) Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:696-702
8. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S et al (2006) Computed tomographic colonography: Assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131:1690-1699
9. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P et al (2008) CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246:463-471
10. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S et al (2006) Computed tomographic colonography: Assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131:1690-1699
11. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA et al (2007) Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: Can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 245:140-149
12. Nicholas Petrick P, Maruf Haider M, Ronald M, Summers MP et al (2008) CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: Observer performance study. Radiology 246:148-156
13. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C et al (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598-2607
14. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C et al (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598-2607
15. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P et al (2008) CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246:463-471
16. de Vries AH, Peters J, Grigorescu S, Truyen R, Gerritsen FA, Stoker J (2005) The performance of CAD versus the performance of an expert in CT colonography. Proc Sixth Int Symp Virtual Colonoscopy, Boston, p 189
17. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191-2200
18. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW et al (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: Conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228:878-885
19. van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127:41-48
20. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002 (2003). Gastrointest Endosc 58:S3-43
21. Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS, Sampliner RE, Hixson LJ, Garewal HS (1993) Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? Am J Gastroenterol 88:496-500
22. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U et al (1997) Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 46:497-502
23. Jensch S, de Vries AH, Peringa J et al (2008) CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: Performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Radiology 247:122-132
24. MacCarty RL, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Wilson LA (2006) Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: Implications for surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1380-1383
25. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA et al (2007) Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: Can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 245:140-149
26. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S et al (2006) Computed tomographic colonography: Assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131:1690-1699
27. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C et al (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598-2607
28. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG et al (2006) CT colonography interpretation times: Effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 16:1745-1749
29. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA et al (2003) Computerized tomographic colonography: Performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 125:688-695
30. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C et al (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598-2607
31. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P et al (2008) CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246:463-471
32. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD et al (2004) Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 11:750-756
33. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ et al (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:881-889
34. MacCarty RL, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Wilson LA (2006) Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: Implications for surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1380-1383
35. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C et al (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598-2607
36. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P et al (2008) CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246:463-471
37. van Gelder RE, Florie J, Nio CY et al (2007) A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:1181-1192
38. Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451-1456