Where will conflicts between alien and rare species occur after climate and land-use change? A test with a novel combined modelling approach

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1209-1227

  Vicente, Joana ^a   Randin, Christophe F ^b   Gonçalves, João ^a   Metzger, Marc J ^c   Lomba, Ângela ^a   Honrado, João ^a   Guisan, Antoine ^d  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Alien invaders; Climate change; Combined predictive modelling; Land use change; Rare species; Species distribution models

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; INVASIVE SPECIES; LAND USE CHANGE; NATIVE SPECIES; RARE SPECIES;

PORTUGAL;

EID: 79955004706     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-011-9952-7     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 42-47.
2. Araújo MB, Williams PH, Turner A (2002) A sequential approach to minimise threats within selected conservation areas. Biodivers Conserv 11: 1011-1024.
3. Araújo MB, Cabeza M, Thuiller W, Hannah L, Williams PH (2004) Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Glob Change Biol 10: 1618-1626.
4. Araújo MB, Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Erhard M (2005) Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Glob Change Biol 11: 1504-1513.
5. Austin MP (2007) Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol Model 200: 1-19.
6. Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H (2004) Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85: 1826-1832.
7. Bradley BA (2009) Regional analysis of impacts of climate change on cheatgrass invasion shows potential risk and opportunity. Glob Change Biol 15: 196-208.
8. Bradley BA (2010) Assessing ecosystem threats from global and regional change: hierarchical modeling of risk to sagebrush ecosystems from climate change, land use and invasive species in Nevada, USA. Ecography 33: 198-208.
9. Bradley BA, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS (2009) Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Glob Change Biol 15: 1511-1521.
10. Broennimann O, Guisan A (2008) Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol Lett 4: 585-589.
11. Broennimann O, Thuiller W, Hughes G, Midgley GF, Alkemade JMR, Guisan A (2006) Do geographic distribution, niche property and life form explain plants' vulnerability to global change? Glob Change Biol 12: 1079-1093.
12. Broennimann O, Treles UA, Müller-Schärer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, Guisan A (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10: 701-709.
13. Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27: 597-623.
14. Carballeira A, Reigosa MJ (1999) Effects of natural leachates of Acacia dealbata Link in Galicia (NW Spain). Bot Bull Acad Sin 40: 87-92.
15. Carson DJ (1999) Climate modelling: achievements and prospects. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 125: 27.
16. Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion Limited, London.
17. Culliney TW (2005) Benefits of classical biological control for managing invasive plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 131-150.
18. Dale VH (1997) The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecol Appl 7: 753-769.
19. Dirnböck T, Dullinger S, Grabherr G (2003) A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J Biogeogr 30: 401-417.
20. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kuhn I, Ohlemuller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schroder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30: 609-628.
21. Elith J, Leathwick J (2007) Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Diversity Distrib 13: 265-275.
22. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Ferrier M, Dudík S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, McC Overton J, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
23. ESRI (2008) ArcGIS 9. 3. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.
24. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C (2007) Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species-the American bullfrog. Diversity Distrib 13: 476-485.
25. Ficetola GF, Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Dendoncker N, Boitani L, Padoa-Schioppa E, Miaud C, Thuiller W (2010) Knowing the past to predict the future: land-use change and the distribution of invasive bullfrogs. Glob Change Biol 16: 528-537.
26. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24: 38-49.
27. Gelfand AE, Schmidt AM, Wu S, Silander JA, Latimer A, Rebelo AG (2005) Modelling species diversity through species level hierarchical modelling. Appl Statist 54: 1-20.
28. Gray TNE, Borey R, Hout SK, Chamnan H, Collar NJ, Dolman PM (2008) Generality of models that predict the distribution of species: conservation activity and reduction of model transferability for a threatened bustard. Conserv Biol 23: 433-439.
29. Guisan A, Theurillat JP (2000) Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate change: a modeling perspective. Integrated Assessment 1: 307-320.
30. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8: 993-1009.
31. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135: 147-186.
32. Guisan A, Lehmann A, Ferrier S, Austin M, Mc Overton J, Aspinall R, Hastie T (2006) Making better biogeographical predictions of species' distributions. J Appl Ecol 43: 386-392.
33. Guisan A, Graham CH, Elith J, Huettmann F (2007) Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Diversity Distrib 13: 332-340.
34. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Toivonen T (2007) Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly: impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape Urban Plan 79: 347-357.
35. Hijmans RJ, Cameron S, Parra J (2005) WorldClim, version 1. 3. http://biogeo. berkeley. edu/worldclim/worldclim. htm. University of California, Berkeley.
36. Hirzel A, Guisan A (2002) Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecol Model 157: 331-341.
37. Klijn F, de Haes HAU (1994) A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implication for ecological land classification. Landscape Ecol 9: 89-104.
38. Lassueur T, Joost S, Randin CF (2006) Very high resolution digital elevation models: do they improve models of plant species distribution? Ecol Model 198: 139-153.
39. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Dev Environ Model Elsevier.
40. Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
41. Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28: 385-393.
42. Mika AM, Weiss RM, Olfert OO, Hallett RH, Newman JA (2008) Will climate change be beneficial or detrimental to the invasive swede midge in North America? Contrasting predictions using climate projections from different general circulation models. Glob Change Biol 14: 1721-1733.
43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report. Island Press, Washington, DC. Online at http://www. millenniumassessment. org/.
44. Muñoz AR, Real R, Barbosa AM, Vargas JM (2005) Modelling the distribution of Bonelli's eagle in Spain: implications for conservation planning. Diversity Distrib 11: 477-486.
45. Murphy HT, Lovett-Doust J (2007) Accounting for regional niche variation in habitat suitability models. OIKOS 116: 99-110.
46. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 570. http://www. ipcc. ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index. htm.
47. Nehrbass N, Winkler E, Pergl J, Perglova I, Pysek P (2006) Empirical and virtual investigation of the population dynamics of an alien plant under the constraints of local carrying capacity: Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7: 253-262.
48. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.
49. Pauchard A, Shea K (2006) Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biol Invasions 8: 399-413.
50. Pearce J, Ferrier S (2001) The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study. Biol Conserv 98: 33-43.
51. Pearson RG, Dawson TE, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27: 285-298.
52. Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier EB, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren J, Simmons P, Watkinson A (2002) Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective ecology and society 6: 1 (online). URL: http://www. consecol. org/vol6/iss1/art1/.
53. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2. 9. 2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www. R-project. org.
54. Randin CF, Engler R, Normand S, Zappa M, Zimmermann NE, Pearman PB, Vittoz P, Thuiller W, Guisan A (2009a) Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high-elevation persistence. Glob Change Biol 15: 1557-1569.
55. Randin CF, Vuissoz G, Liston G, Vittoz P, Guisan A (2009b) Introduction of snow and geomorphic disturbance variables into predictive models of alpine plant distribution in the Western Swiss Alps. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41: 347-361.
56. Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araujo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpaa S, Leemans R, Metzger MJ, Schmit C, Smith P, Tuck G (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114: 57-68.
57. Settle C, Shogren JF (2002) Modeling native-exotic species within Yellowstone lake. Am J Agr Econ 84: 1323-1328.
58. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176: 256-273.
59. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change. Glob Change Biol 10: 2020-2027.
60. Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? J Biogeogr 31: 353-361.
61. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11: 2234-2250.
62. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9: 137-152.
63. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB (2009) BIOMOD-a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32: 369-373.
64. Titeux N, Dufrene M, Radoux J, Hirzel AH, Defourny P (2007) Fitness-related parameters improve presence-only distribution modelling for conservation practice: The case of the red-backed shrike. Biol Conserv 138: 207-223.
65. Vicente J, Alves P, Randin C, Guisan A, Honrado J (2010) What drives invasibility? A multi-model inference test and spatial modelling of alien plant species richness patterns in Northern Portugal. Ecography 33: 1081-1092. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-0587. 2010. 6380. x.
66. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3: 385-397.
67. Wiens JA (2002) Predicting species occurrences: progress, problems, and prospects. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Covelo, pp 739-749.
68. Wisz M, Guisan A (2009) Do pseudo-absence selection strategies affect geographic predictions of species? A virtual species approach. BMC Ecology 9 (online). http://www. biomedcentral. com/content/pdf/1472-6785-9-8. pdf.