The information exchanged under REACH: A cost-sharing analysis;Les informations exigées par la législation REACH: Analyse du partage des coÛts

Revue d'Economie Politique

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 991-1014

  Béal, Sylvain ^a   Deschamps, Marc ^b   Ravix, Joël Thomas ^c   Sautel, Olivier ^d  

^a CRESE ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d OFCE   (France)

Author keywords

Compensation scheme; Data sharing; Equal division; Marginal cost; Reach regulation; Shapley value

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954530541     PISSN: 03732630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/redp.206.0991     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AADLAND D., KOLPIN V. [1998], "Shared irrigation costs: An empirical and axiomatic analysis", Mathematical Social Sciences, 35, p. 203-218.
2. VAN DEN BRINK R. [2007], "Null or nullifying players: The difference between the Shapley value and equal division solutions", Journal of Economic Theory, 136, p. 767-775.
3. DEHEZ P., TELLONE D. [2010], "Data games. Sharing public goods with exclusion", à paraître dans Journal of Public Economic Theory.
4. ECHA [2007], "Guidance for the implementation of REACH: Guidance on data sharing", document de I'European Chemicals Agency, disponible à l'adresse: http:// guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance-document/data-sharing- en.pdf
5. JU Y., BORM P., RUYS P. [2007], "The consensus value: a new solution concept for cooperative games", Social Choice & Welfare, 28, p. 685-703.
6. MOULIN H. [1981], Théorie des jeux pour l'économie et la politique, Hermann, Paris.
7. MOULIN H., SHENKER S. [1992], "Serial cost sharing", Econométrica, 50, p. 1009-1039.
8. MOULIN H., SPRUMONT Y. [2007], "Fair allocation of production externalities: recent results", Revue d'Economie Politique, 117, p. 7-36.
9. SCHMEIDLER D. [1969], "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game", SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17, p. 1163-1170.
10. SHAPLEY L S. [1953], "A value for n-person games", Contributions to the theory of games (Kuhn H.W., A.W. Tucker eds), vol. II, Princeton University Press, 307-317.
11. THOMSON W. [2001], "On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and ressource allocation", Social Choice & Welfare, 18, p. 327-386.
12. VINCENT A. L., GARDERES N. [2008], "REACH, les consortiums et le droit de la concurrence", Bulletin du Droit de l'Environnement Industriel, 14, p. 36-38.
13. YOUNG H. P. [1985], "Monotonie solutions of cooperative games", International Journal of Game Theory, 14, p. 65-72.
14. YOUNG H. P. [1994], Equity in theory and practice, Princeton University Press.