Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? a critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher

Qualitative Research

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 197-212

  Tilley, Liz ^a   Woodthorpe, Kate ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

accountability; anonymity; dissemination; ethics; knowledge transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954521678     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794110394073     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alterio M. (2004) Collaborative journalling as a professional development tool. Journal of Further and Higher Education 28(3): 321-332.
2. American Anthropological Association (2009) AAA Code of Ethics. Available at: http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/Code-of-Ethics.cfm (accessed 20 June 2009).
3. American Sociological Association (1999) Code of Ethics. Available at: http://www.asanet.org/images/asa/docs/pdf/Ethics%20Code.pdf (accessed 11 December 2009).
4. Atkinson D, Jackson M and Walmsley J (1997) Forgotten Lives: Exploring the History of Learning Disability. Kidderminster: BILD Publications.
5. Baez B. (2002) Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research 2(1): 35-58.
6. Bonnell V. (1980) The uses of theory, concepts and comparison in historical sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22(2): 156-173.
7. Bradshaw M. (2003) A politics of doing social research for fishery biologists, managers and industry. Qualitative Research 3(3): 359-376.
8. British Sociological Association (2002) Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association. Available at: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/Statement+Ethical+Practice.htm (accessed 16 December 2010).
9. Bryman A. (2004) Social Research Methods (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Butler I. (2002) A code of ethics for social work and social care research. British Journal of Social Work 32: 239-248.
11. Cannella GS and Lincoln YS (2007) Predatory vs. dialogic ethics: constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry 13(3): 315-335.
12. Christensen P. and Prout A. (2002) Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood 9(4) 477-497.
13. Cornwall A. and Jewkes R. (1995) What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine 41(12): 1667-1776.
14. Darlington Y and Scott D (2002) Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories from the Field. Buckingham: Open University Press.
15. Department of Health (2005) Research governance framework for health and social care: second edition. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4108962 (accessed 20 June 2009).
16. Dunkerly D. (1988) Historical methods and organization analysis: the case of a naval dockyard. In: Bryman A (ed.) Doing Research in Organizations. London: Routledge, 82-95.
17. Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Research ethics framework. Available at: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6-11291.pdf (accessed 20th June 2009).
18. Flicker S., Haans D. and Skinner H. (2004) Ethical dilemmas in research on internet communities. Qualitative Health Research 14(1): 124-134.
19. Fyfe N. and Milligan C. (2003) Out of the shadows: exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism. Progress in Human Geography 27(4): 397-413.
20. Giordano J., O'Reilly M., Taylor M. and Dogra N. (2007) Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research 17(2): 264-275.
21. Grinyer A. (2002) The anonymity of research participants. Social Research Update 36. Available at: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU36.html (accessed 20 June 2009).
22. Hall J. (1992) Where history and sociology meet: forms of discourse and sociohistorical inquiry. Sociological Theory 10(2): 164-193.
23. Hammersley M. (2003) Social Research today: some dilemmas and distinctions. Qualitative Social Work 2(1): 25-44.
24. Hookway N. (2008) 'Entering the blogosphere': some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research 8(1): 91-113.
25. Huberman M. (1995) The many modes of participatory evaluation. In: Cousins JB and Earl LM (eds) Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning. London: Routledge, 103-112.
26. James N. and Busher H. (2006) Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research 6(3): 403-420.
27. Jessop B. (2000) The state and contradictions of the knowledge-driven economy. In: Bryson JR, Daniels PW, Henry N and Pollard J (eds) Knowledge, Space, Economy. London: Routledge, 63-78.
28. Joint Research Council's Skills Statement (2001) Available at: http://www.grad.ac.uk/downloads/documents/general/Joint%20Skills%20Statement.pdf (accessed 20 June 2009).
29. Kelly A. (2009) In defence of anonymity: rejoining the criticism. British Educational Research Journal 35(3): 431-445.
30. Kennedy JE (2005) Grey matter: ambiguities and complexities of ethics in research. Journal of Academic Ethics 3(2-4): 143-158.
31. Marzano M. (2007) Informed consent, deception, and research freedom in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 13(3): 417-436.
32. Mitchell D, Traustadottir R, Chapman R, Townson L, Ingham N and Ledger S (eds) (2006) Exploring Experiences of Advocacy by People with Learning Disabilities: Testimonies of Resistance. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 100-117.
33. Nespor J. (2000) Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 6(4): 546-569.
34. Nissenbaum H. (1999) The meaning of anonymity in an information age. The Information Society: An International Journal 15(2): 141-144.
35. Papacharissi Z. (2002) The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society 4(1): 9-27.
36. Piper H. and Simons H. (2005) Ethical responsibility in social research. In: Somekh B and Lewin C (eds) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: Sage, 56-63.
37. Popay J. and Williams G. (1998) Qualitative research and evidence based healthcare. Journal for the Royal Society of Medicine 91(35): 32-37.
38. Royal College of Nursing (2005) Informed Consent in Health and Social Care Research: RCN Guidance for Nurses. London: RCN.
39. Scott S. (2004) Researching shyness: a contradiction in terms? Qualitative Research 4(1): 91-105.
40. Silverman D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook (2nd Edition). London: Sage.
41. Snyder L. (2002) Confidentiality and Anonymity: Promises and Practices. In: van den Hoonard WC (ed.) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 70-78.
42. Social Research Association (2003) Ethical Guidelines. Available at: http://www.the-sra.org.uk/documents/pdfs/ethics03.pdf (accessed 20 June 2009).
43. Sparkes A. (2007) Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: a story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research 7(4): 521-550.
44. Stewart K. and Williams M. (2005) Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research 5(4): 395-416.
45. Tilley E. (2006) Advocacy for people with learning difficulties: the role of two organisations. Unpublished PhD thesis, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
46. Tilley S. and Gormley L. (2007) Canadian university ethics review: cultural complications translating principles into practice. Qualitative Inquiry 13(3): 368-387.
47. Tuchman G. (1994) Historical social science: methodologies, methods, and meanings. In: Denzin N and Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 306-323.
48. Traustadottir R and Johnson K (eds) (2000) Women with Intellectual Disabilities: Finding a Place in the World. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
49. Urban G. (1996) Entextualization, replication, and power. In: Silverstein M and Urban G (eds) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 21-44.
50. van den Hoonard WC (ed.) (2002) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
51. van den Hoonaard WC (2003) Is anonymity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of Academic Ethics 1(2): 141-151.
52. Walford G. (2005) Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 28(1): 83-93.
53. Walmsley J. (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability and Society 16(2): 187-205.
54. Ward A. (2009) Is your oral history legal and ethical? The Oral History Society. Available at: http://www.ohs.org.uk/ethics/index.php (accessed 11 December 2009).
55. Wiles R., Charles V., Crow G. and Heath S. (2006) Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics. Qualitative Research 6(3): 283-299.
56. Wiles R., Crow G., Heath S. and Charles V. (2008) The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11(5): 417-428.
57. Woodthorpe K. (2007) Negotiating uncertainty and ambiguity in the contemporary cemetery. Unpublished PhD thesis, Sheffield, University of Sheffield.