A Politics of Doing Social Research for Fishery Biologists, Managers and Industry

Qualitative Research

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 359-376

  Bradshaw, Matt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

external funding; fisheries; politics and methodology; social impact assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85004434499     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794103033005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acheson, J. (1988) The Lobster Gangs of Maine. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
2. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001) ‘Thematic Networks: An Analytical Tool for QualitativeResearch’, Qualitative Research 1(3): 385-404.
3. Bhaskar, R. (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
4. Cawthorne, P. (2001) ‘Identity, Values and Method: Taking Interview ResearchSeriously in Political Economy’, Qualitative Research 1(1): 65-90.
5. Clay, P. and Dolin, E. (1997) ‘Building Better Social Impact Assessments’, Fisheries 22(9): 12-13.
6. Demeritt, D. (2000) ‘The New Social Contract for Science: Accountability, Relevance, and Value in US and UK Science and Research Policy’, Antipode 32(3): 308-329.
7. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1997) ‘Introduction to Special Issue on SciencePolicy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Science and Public Policy 24(1): 2-5.
8. Gardner, G. (2001) ‘Unreliable Memories and Other Contingencies: Problems withBiographical Knowledge’, Qualitative Research 1(2): 185-204.
9. Giddens, A. (1993) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Hammersley, M. (1995) The Politics of Social Research. London: Sage Publications.
11. Hammersley, M. (2001) ‘Which Side was Becker On? Questioning Political andEpistemological Radicalism’, Qualitative Research 1(1): 91-110.
12. Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge, MA andLondon: Blackwell.
13. Knox, C. (2001) ‘Establishing Research Legitimacy in the Contested Political Ground of Contemporary Northern Ireland’, Qualitative Research 1(2): 205-222.
14. Michie, S. and Marteau, T. (1999) ‘Non-response Bias in Prospective Studies ofPatients and Health Care Professionals’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2(3): 203-212.
15. Morrow, H. (1992) An Economic Analysis of the Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishery 1990/91: A Report to the Rock Lobster Working Group, September 1992, Based on a Survey of Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishermen conducted from March to August 1992. Hobart.
16. New England Fishery Management Council (2001) Report from the Groundfish Social Impact Informational Meetings. Newburyport: New England Fishery Management Council.
17. Parliament of Tasmania (1997) Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishery. Hobart: LegislativeCouncil Select Committee Report.
18. Perelman, M. (1996) ‘Marx and Resource Scarcity’, in T. Benton (ed.) The Greening of Marxism. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
19. Ram, M. (1995) ‘The Politics of Research: Local Consultation in a City ChallengeContext’, Sociology 29(2): 275-292.
20. Rapley, T. (2001) ‘The Art(fulness) of Open-ended Interviewing: SomeConsiderations on Analysing Interviews’, Qualitative Research 1(3): 303-324.
21. Rundle, B. (1990) Wittgenstein and Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Storey, P. (1998) ‘From Cray Rings to Closure: Aspects of the Tasmanian FishingIndustry to circa 1970’, Tasmanian Historical Research Association: Papers andProceedings 45: 125-143.
23. Williamson, S., Wood, L. and Bradshaw, M. (1998) A Socioeconomic Profile of the Rock Lobster Industry in Tasmania and the Effects of a Shift to a Quota Management System on Four Port Communities. Hobart: Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries.