How to define an object: Evidence from the effects of action on perception and attention

Mind and Language

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 534-547

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Riddoch, M Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648932446     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00319.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biederman, I. 1972 : Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77 80.
2. Carr, T.H., Lehkuhle, S.W., Kottas, B. and Astor-Stetson, E.C. 1976 : Target position and practice in the identification of letters in varying contexts: A word superiority effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 412 416.
3. Deubel, H., Schneider, W.X. and Paprotta, I. 1998 : Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5, 81 107.
4. Dijkerman, H.C., Milner, A.D. and Carey, D.P. 1998 : Grasping spatial relationships: Failure to demonstrate allocentric visual coding in a patient with visual form agnosia. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 438 453.
5. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G.W. and Ward, R. 1997 : Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255 261.
6. Egly, R., Driver, J. and Rafal, R.D. 1994 : Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 123, 161 177.
7. Gibson, J.J. 1979 : The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Gregory, R. 1970 : The Intelligent Eye. London : Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
9. Hebb, D.O. 1949 : The Organization of Behavior. New York : Wiley.
10. Henderson, J.M. and Hollingworth, A. 1999 : High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243 271.
11. Humphreys, G.W. 1998 : The neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 353, 1341 1351.
12. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J. and Quinlan, P.T. 1990 : Early orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517 560.
13. Karnath, H-O. 1988 : Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia, 26, 27 43.
14. Kumada, T. and Humphreys, G.W. 2001 : Lexical recovery on extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 465 478.
15. Lhermitte, F. 1983 : 'Utilisation' behaviour and its relations to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237 255.
16. Linnell, K.J., Humphreys, G.W., McIntyre, D.B., Laitinen, S. and Wing, A.M. 2005 : Action modulates object-based selection. Vision Research, 45, 2268 2286.
17. Milner, A.D. and Goodale, M.A. 1995 : The Visual Brain in Action. New York : Academic Press.
18. Milner, A.D., Perrett, D.I., Johnston, R.S., Benson, P.J., Jordan, T.R., Heeley, D.W., Bettucci, D., Mortara, F., Mutani, R., Terazzi, E. and Davidson, D.L. 1991 : Perception and action in visual form agnosia. Brain, 114, 405 428.
19. Palmer, S.E. and Rock, I. 1994 : Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 29 55.
20. Rensink, R.A. and Enns, J.T. 1995 : Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 1021, 101 130.
21. Riddoch, M.J., Edwards, M.G., Humphreys, G.W., West, R. and Heafield, T. 1998 : Visual affordances direct action. Neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 645 684.
22. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W. and Edwards, M. 2000 : Visual affordances and object selection. In S. Monsell and J. Driver (eds Attention and Performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
23. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W., Edwards, S., Baker, T. and Willson, K. 2003 : Actions glue objects but associations glue words: Neuropsychological evidence for multiple object selection. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 82 89.
24. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W., Hickman, M., Clift, J., Daly, A. and Colin, J. 2006 : I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 583 605.
25. Rossetti Y. and Pisella L. 2002 : Several 'vision for action' systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (eds Attention And Performance. XIX. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 62 119.
26. Schenk, T. 2006 : An allocentric rather than a perceptual deficit in patient DF. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1369 1370.
27. Wertheimer, M. 1912 : Experimentelle Studien uber das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 61, 161 265.