Frameworks for understanding the nature of interactions, networking, and community in a social networking site for academic practice

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 119-138

  Conole, Grainne ^a   Galley, Rebecca ^a   Culver, Juliette ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Actor network theory; Cloudworks; Communities of inquiry; Communities of practice; Connectivism; Design based research; Frameworks; Social and participatory web practices; Social networking; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954508479     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.914     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrews, R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of e-learning research. London: Sage.
2. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136.
3. Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 153-169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Borgeman, C., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K., Linn, M., et al. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge (Report of the National Science Foundation task force on cyberlearning). http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf08204
5. Bouman, W., Hoogenboom, T., Jansen, R., Schoondorp, M., de Bruin, B., & Huizing, A. (2007). The realm of sociality: Notes on the design of social software. The 28th International Conference on Information Systems.
6. Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice, the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinhi & B. Harper (Eds.). Handbook of learning designs and learning objects. IGI Global.
7. Conole, G. (2010a). Learning design - making practice explicit. Paper presented at the ConnectEd 2nd International Conference on Design Education. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/4001
8. Conole, G. (2010b). Review of pedagogical frameworks and models and their use in e-learning. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/2982
9. Conole, G. (2010c). Theory and methodology in networked learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference Hotseat. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/2881
10. Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). Review of the use(s) of Web 2.0 in higher education. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/1895
11. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2009). Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5).
12. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2010). The desing of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Computers and Education, 54(3), 679-692.
13. Conole, G., & Oliver, M. (2007). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Mundin, P., & Farrow, R. (2010). Technology-enhanced learning as a site for interdisciplinary research. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/3419
15. Conole, G., White, S., & Oliver, M. (2007). The impact of e-learning on organisational roles and structure. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
16. Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge University Press.
17. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
18. Downes, S. (2007, June). An introduction to connective knowledge. Paper presented at the Media, Knowledge & Education - Exploring New Spaces, Relations and Dynamics in Digital Media Ecologies, Vienna.
19. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 2460-2467). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
20. Engeström, J. (2005). Why some social network services work and others don't - Or: The case for object-centered sociality. Retrieved from http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why_some_social.html
21. Engeström, Y., Punamäki-Gitai, R. L., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.
22. Esnault, L. (2007). Actor-network theory and e-learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2(11).
23. Galley, R., Conole, G., Dalziel, J., & Ghiglione, E. (2010). Cloudworks as a 'pedagogical wrapper' for LAMS sequences: Supporting the sharing of ideas across professional boundaries and facilitating collaborative design, evaluation and critical reflection. Paper presented at the 2010 European LAMS and Learning Design Conference. Retrieved from http://lams2010.lamsfoundation.org/abstract.htm#a7
24. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
25. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (Eds.). (2005). Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Howe, J. (2006, June 2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired.
28. Latour, B. (1997). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications (working paper). Retrieved from http://www.cours.fse.ulaval.ca/edc-65804/latour-clarifications.pdf
29. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. Routledge.
30. Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
31. Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
32. Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning frameworks, models and theories. JISC e-learning models desk study.
33. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
34. Reigeluth, C. M., & An, Y. (2009). Theory building. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base, Volume III (pp. 385-386). Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.
35. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Koan Page.
36. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Siemens, G. (2005a). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
38. Steeples, C., & Jones, C. (Eds.). (2002). Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer-Verlag.
39. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of the crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Doubleday.
40. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
41. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives). Cambridge University Press.