Whole-chromosome aneuploidy analysis in human oocytes: Focus on comparative genomic hybridization

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 133, Issue 2-4, 2011, Pages 119-126

  Obradors, A ^a,b,c   Rius, M ^a   Daina, G ^a   Ramos, L ^a   Benet, J ^a   Navarro, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b Càtedra de Recerca Eugin UAB   (Spain)

^c Clinica EUGIN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Comparative genomic hybridization; Meiotic errors; Oocyte

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GERMINAL VESICLE; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE 46,XX; MEIOSIS; OOCYTE; OOCYTE DONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANEUPLOIDY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MEIOSIS; OOCYTES;

EID: 79954498982     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000324233     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP, et al: Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 23: 756-771 (2008).
2. Angell R: First-meiotic-division nondisjunction in human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 61: 23-32 (1997). (Pubitemid 27323320)
3. Bahçe M, Cohen J, Munne S: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes? J Assist Reprod Genet 16: 176-181 (1999). (Pubitemid 29200656)
4. Bodri D, Colodron M, Vidal R, et al: Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome. Fertil Steril 88: 1548-1553 (2007). (Pubitemid 350216851)
5. Boue A, Boue J, Gropp A: Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage. Adv Hum Genet 14: 1-57 (1985).
6. Clyde JM, Gosden RG, Rutherford AJ, et al: Demonstration of a mechanism of aneuploidy in human oocytes using Multifluor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Fertil Steril 76: 837-840 (2001). (Pubitemid 32928417)
7. Cozzi J, Conn CM, Harper J, et al: A trisomic germ cell line and precocious chromatid segregation leads to recurrent trisomy 21 conception. Hum Genet 104: 23-28 (1999). (Pubitemid 29134637)
8. Cupisti S, Conn CM, Fragouli E, et al: Sequential FISH analysis of oocytes and polar bodies reveals aneuploidy mechanisms. Prenat Diagn 23: 663-668 (2003). (Pubitemid 36987409)
9. Fragouli E, Wells D, Doshi A, Gotts S, Harper JC, Delhanty JD: Complete cytogenetic investigation of oocytes from a young cancer patient with the use of comparative genomic hybridisation reveals meiotic errors. Prenat Diagn 26: 71-76 (2006a). (Pubitemid 43189336)
10. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, Thornton S, Jenner L, Cater E, Brown A, Garcia-Bernardo J: Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril 93:1006.e7-1006.e10 (2010).
11. Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A, et al: Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum Reprod 21: 2319-2328 (2006b). (Pubitemid 44530606)
12. Fragouli E, Wells D, Whalley KM, et al: Increased susceptibility to maternal aneuploidy demonstrated by comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human MII oocytes and first polar bodies. Cytogenet Genome Res 114: 30-38 (2006c). (Pubitemid 43886305)
13. Fragouli E, Delhanty JD, Wells D: Single cell diagnosis using comparative genomic hybridization after preliminary DNA amplification still needs more tweaking: too many miscalls. Fertil Steril 88: 247-248;
14. Fragouli E, Escalona A, Gutierrez-Mateo C, et al: Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors. Reprod Biomed Online 19: 228-237 (2009).
15. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Caligara C, et al: Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril 80: 54-60 (2003). (Pubitemid 36808855)
16. Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, et al: What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod 25: 575-577 (2009).
17. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D, et al: Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Hum Reprod 19: 2859-2868 (2004a). (Pubitemid 40028959)
18. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Wells D, Benet J, et al: Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod 19: 2118-2125 (2004b). (Pubitemid 39236482)
19. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Starke H, et al: Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenMFISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique. Hum Reprod 20: 3395-3401 (2005a). (Pubitemid 41742518)
20. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Gadea L, Benet J, et al: Aneuploidy 12 in a Robertsonian (13; 14) carrier: Case report. Hum Reprod 20: 1256-1260 (2005b). (Pubitemid 40790249)
21. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Fischer J, et al: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene disorders: experience with more than 200 cycles conducted by a reference laboratory in the United States. Fertil Steril 92: 1544-1556 (2009).
22. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, et al: Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet 47: 651-658 (2010).
23. Hassold T, Hunt P: To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2: 280-291 (2001). (Pubitemid 33674776)
24. Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, et al: Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 28: 167-175 (1996). (Pubitemid 26380273)
25. Hulten MA, Patel SD, Tankimanova M, et al: On the origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome. Mol Cytogenet 1: 21 (2008).
26. Keskintepe L, Sher G, Keskintepe M: Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. Reprod Biomed Online 15: 303-309 (2007). (Pubitemid 47430370)
27. Li Y, Feng HL, Cao YJ, et al: Confocal microscopic analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro. Fertil Steril 85: 827-832 (2006).
28. Mahmood R, Brierley CH, Faed MJ, et al: Mechanisms of maternal aneuploidy: FISH analysis of oocytes and polar bodies in patients undergoing assisted conception. Hum Genet 106: 620-626 (2000). (Pubitemid 30427016)
29. Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, et al: Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 64: 382-391 (1995).
30. Munne S, Ary J, Zouves C, et al: Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young egg donors. Reprod Biomed Online 12: 340-346 (2006).
31. Navarro J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Pujol A, Durban M, Sanchez-Garcia JF, et al: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): Screening for aneuploidy in human oocytes and polar bodies, in Wells D (ed): Cytogenetics in Reproductive Medicine. (Landes Bioscience, Austin 2005).
32. Nicolaidis P, Petersen MB: Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies. Hum Reprod 13: 313-319 (1998).
33. Obradors A, Fernandez E, Oliver-Bonet M, et al: Birth of a healthy boy after a double factor PGD in a couple carrying a genetic disease and at risk for aneuploidy: case report. Hum Reprod 23: 1949-1956 (2008). (Pubitemid 352020020)
34. Obradors A, Fernandez E, Rius M, et al: Outcome of twin babies free of Von Hippel-Lindau disease after a double-factor preimplantation genetic diagnosis: monogenetic mutation analysis and comprehensive aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril 91: 933e1-7 (2009).
35. Obradors A, Rius M, Cuzzi J, et al: Errors at mitotic segregation early in oogenesis and at first meiotic division in oocytes from donor females: comparative genomic hybridization analyzes in metaphase II oocytes and their first polar body. Fertil Steril 93: 675-679 (2010).
36. Pellestor F: Frequency and distribution of aneuploidy in human female gametes. Hum Genet 86: 283-288 (1991).
37. Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, et al: Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet 112: 195-203 (2003). (Pubitemid 36869104)
38. Pujol A, Boiso I, Benet J, et al: Analysis of nine chromosome probes in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes for the detection of aneuploidies. Eur J Hum Genet 11: 325-336 (2003). (Pubitemid 36553491)
39. Reis Soares S, Rubio C, Rodrigo L, et al: High frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos obtained from oocyte donation cycles. Fertil Steril 80: 656-657 (2003). (Pubitemid 37102888)
40. Requena A, Bronet F, Guillen A, et al: The impact of in-vitro maturation of oocytes on aneuploidy rate. Reprod Biomed Online 18: 777-783 (2009).
41. Rius M, Obradors A, Daina G, et al: Reliability of short comparative genomic hybridization in fibroblasts and blastomeres for a comprehensive aneuploidy screening: first clinical application. Hum Reprod 25: 1824-1835 (2010).
42. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M, et al: Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 16: 1954-1958 (2001). (Pubitemid 32916228)
43. Sandalinas M, Marquez C, Munne S: Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 580-585 (2002). (Pubitemid 34746293)
44. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, et al: Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 94: 1700-1706 (2010).
45. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, et al: Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybrydization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting 'competent' embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil Steril 87: 1033-1040 (2007). (Pubitemid 46659945)
46. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, et al: Polar body diagnosis of common aneuploidies by FISH. J Assist Reprod Genet 13: 157-162 (1996). (Pubitemid 26064346)
47. Vialard F, Gomes DM, Hammoud I, et al: Stability of aneuploidy rate in polar bodies in 2 cohorts from the same patient. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 213-219 (2008).
48. Vlaisavljevic V, Krizancic Bombek L, Vokac NK, et al: How safe is germinal vesicle stage oocyte rescue? Aneuploidy analysis of in vitro matured oocytes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 134: 213-219 (2007). (Pubitemid 47454760)
49. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, et al: Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn 19: 846-851 (1999). (Pubitemid 29438175)
50. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, et al: Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet 106: 210-217 (2000). (Pubitemid 30156426)
51. Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J, et al: Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 1035-1041 (2002). (Pubitemid 35331809)
52. Weghofer A, Munne S, Brannath W, et al: The impact of LH-containing gonadotropins on diploidy rates in preimplantation embryos: long protocol stimulation. Hum Reprod 23: 499-503 (2008). (Pubitemid 351651217)
53. Weghofer A, Munne S, Brannath W, et al: The impact of LH-containing gonadotropin stimulation on euploidy rates in preimplantation embryos: antagonist cycles. Fertil Steril 92: 937-942 (2009).
54. Wells D, Delhanty JD: Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 6: 1055-1062 (2000).
55. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, et al: Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 1214-1218 (1999). (Pubitemid 29209528)
56. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, et al: First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 78: 543-549 (2002).
57. Wilton L: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod Update 11: 33-41 (2005). (Pubitemid 40201974)
58. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, et al: Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril 80: 860-868 (2003). (Pubitemid 37230016)