Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1548-1553

  Bodri, Daniel ^a   Colodron, Marta ^a   Vidal, Ricard ^a   Galindo, Anna ^a   Durban, Mercè ^a   Coll, Oriol ^a  

^a Clinica EUGIN   (Spain)

Author keywords

discordant outcome; Oocyte donation; shared oocytes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OOCYTE DONATION; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS MYOMA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EMBRYO LOSS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OOCYTE DONATION; OOCYTES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36749092874     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.054     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Faber B.M., Mercan R., Hamacher P., Muasher S.J., and Toner J.P. The impact of an egg donor's age and her prior fertility on recipient pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 68 (1997) 370-372
2. Cohen M.A., Lindheim S.R., and Sauer M.V. Donor age is paramount to success in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 14 (1990) 2755-2758
3. Mirkin S., Gimeno T.G., Bovea C., Stadtmauer L., Gibbons W.E., and Oehninger S. Factors associated with an optimal pregnancy outcome in an oocyte donation program. J Assist Reprod Genet 20 (2003) 400-408
4. Flamigni C., Borini A., Violini F., Bianchi L., and Serrao L. Oocyte donation: comparison between recipients from different age groups. Hum Reprod 12 (1993) 2088-2092
5. Legro R.S., Wong I.L., Paulson R.J., Lobo R.A., and Sauer M.V. Recipient's age does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome after oocyte donation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 (1992) 96-100
6. Yaron Y., Ochshorn Y., Amit A., Kogosowski A., Yovel I., and Lessing J.B. Oocyte donation in Israel: a study of 1001 initiated treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 13 (1998) 1819-1824
7. Moomjy M., Cholst I., Mangieri R., and Rosenwaks Z. Oocyte donation: insights into implantation. Fertil Steril 71 (1999) 15-21
8. Soares S.R., Troncoso C., Bosch E., Serra V., Simon C., Remohi J., et al. Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90 (2005) 4399-4404
9. Remohí J., Gartner B., Gallardo E., Yalil S., Simon C., and Pellicer A. Pregnancy and birth rates after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 67 (1997) 717-723
10. Paulson R.J., Hatch I.E., Lobo R.A., and Sauer M.V. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after oocyte donation: implications regarding endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 835-839
11. Remohí J., Ardiles G., Garcia-Velasco J.A., Gaitan P., Simon C., and Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 2271-2276
12. Noyes N., Hampton B.S., Berkeley A., Licciardi F., Grifo J., and Krey L. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril 76 (2001) 92-97
13. Remohí J., Gutierrez A., Cano F., Ruiz A., Simon C., and Pellicer A. Long oestradiol replacement in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod 10 (1995) 1387-1391
14. Borini A., Dal Prato L., Bianchi L., Violini F., Cattoli M., and Flamigni C. Effect of duration of estradiol replacement on the outcome of oocyte donation. J Assist Reprod Genet 18 (2001) 185-190
15. Navot D., Drews M.R., Bergh P.A., Guzman I., Karstaedt A., Scott Jr. R.T., et al. Age-related decline in female fertility is not due to diminished capacity of the uterus to sustain embryo implantation. Fertil Steril 61 (1994) 97-101
16. Borini A., Bianchi L., Violini F., Macciolini A., Cattoli M., and Flamigni C. Oocyte donation program: pregnancy and implantation rates in women of different ages sharing oocytes from single donor. Fertil Steril 65 (1996) 94-97
17. Abdalla H.I., Wren M.E., Thomas A., and Korea L. Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 827-829
18. Diaz I., Navarro J., Blasco L., Simon C., Pellicer A., and Remohi J. Impact of stage III-IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study. Fertil Steril 74 (2000) 31-34
19. Nasseri A., Mukherjee T., Berkeley A.S., Licciardi F., Krey L.C., and Copperman A. Predictors of discordant outcome in paired ovum recipients. [abstract]. Fertil Steril 74 (2000) S75
20. Garcia-Velasco J.A., Isaza V., Caligara C., Pellicer A., Remohi J., and Simon C. Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril 80 (2003) 54-60
21. Zenke U., and Chetkowski R.J. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs. Fertil Steril 82 (2004) 850-856
22. Bodri D., Vernaeve V., Guillén J.J., Vidal R., Figueras F., and Coll O. Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 2246-2251
23. Coroleu B., Barri P.N., Carreras O., Martínez F., Parriego M., Hereter L., et al. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study. Hum Reprod 17 (2002) 341-346
24. Spandorfer S.D., Moomjy M., Davis O.K., Barmat L.I., Cholst I., and Rosenwaks Z. Oocyte donation: does a previous attempt affect a subsequent attempt?. Fertil Steril 70 (1998) 222-226
25. Donnez J., and Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility?. Hum Reprod 17 (2002) 1424-1430
26. Gianaroli L., Gordts S., D'Angelo A., Magli M.C., Brosens I., Cetera C., et al. Effect of inner myometrium fibroid on reproductive outcome after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 10 (2005) 473-477
27. Oehninger S., Chaturvedi S., Toner J., Morshedi M., Mayer J., Lazendorf S., et al. Semen quality: is there a paternal effect on pregnancy outcome in in-vitro-fertilization/intracytoplasmatic sperm injection?. Hum Reprod 13 (1998) 2161-2164
28. Harris S.E., Faddy M., Levett S., Sharma V., and Gosdon R. Analysis of donor heterogeneity as a factor affecting the clinical outcome of oocyte donation. Hum Fertil (Camb) 5 (2002) 193-198
29. Soares S.R., Rubio C., Rodrigo L., Simon C., Remohi J., and Pellicer A. High frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos obtained from oocyte donation cycles. Fertil Steril 80 (2003) 656-657
30. Munne S., Ary J., Zouves C., Escudero T., Barnes F., Cinioglu C., et al. Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young egg donors. Reprod Biomed Online 12 (2006) 340-346
31. Pantos K., Nikas G., Makrakis E., Stavrou D., Karantzis P., and Grammatis M. Clinical value of endometrial pinopodes detection in artificial donation cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 9 (2004) 86-90
32. Henriquez S., Tapia A., Quezada M., Vargas M., Cardenas H., Rios M., et al. Deficient expression of monoamine oxidase A in the endometrium is associated with implantation failure in women participating as recipients in oocyte donation. Mol Hum Reprod 12 (2006) 749-754
33. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 60-2