Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: Experience from Australasia

BJU International

Volumn 107, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages 11-19

  Cathcart, Paul ^a   Murphy, Declan G ^b,c   Moon, Daniel ^a   Costello, Anthony J ^b   Frydenberg, Mark ^d  

^a ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b EPWORTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australasia; laparoscopic; outcomes; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robotic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; CANCER SURGERY; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM INJURY; ROBOTICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 79954476697     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia. Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Australia. 2010. Available at:. Accessed December 2010
2. Young HH,. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol 2002; 168: 914-21
3. Reiner WG, Walsh PC,. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol 1979; 121: 198-200 (Pubitemid 9135005)
4. Walsh PC, Donker PJ,. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492-7 (Pubitemid 12037690)
5. Murphy DG, Hall R, Tong R, Goel R, Costello AJ,. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 1076-81
6. Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, et al,. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int 2010; 106: 378-84
7. Webb DR, Sethi K, Gee K,. An analysis of the causes of bladder neck contracture after open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2009; 103: 957-63
8. O'Malley PJ, Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes DM, Crowe H, Costello AJ,. Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience. World J Urol 2006; 24: 165-70 (Pubitemid 43842546)
9. Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ,. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1358-66
10. Newton FJ, Burney S, Millar JL, Frydenberg M, Ng KT,. Disease-specific quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer: an Australian perspective. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1179-83 (Pubitemid 43907317)
11. Heathcote PS, Mactaggart PN, Boston RJ, James AN, Thompson LC, Nicol DL,. Health-related quality of life in Australian men remaining disease-free after radical prostatectomy. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 483-6 (Pubitemid 28242903)
12. Kaye KW, Creed KE, Wilson GJ, D'Antuono M, Dawkins HJ,. Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Analysis and synthesis of contributing factors: a unified concept. Br J Urol 1997; 80: 444-501
13. Donnellan SM, Duncan HJ, MacGregor RJ, Russell JM,. Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology 1997; 49: 225-30 (Pubitemid 27074186)
14. Masters JG, Rice ML,. Improvement in urinary symptoms after radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of flow rates and symptom scores. BJU Int 2003; 91: 795-7 (Pubitemid 36724061)
15. Wilson LC, Kennett KM, Gilling PJ,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: early safety and efficacy. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 1065-8 (Pubitemid 40006991)
16. Hellawell GO, Moon DA,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reducing the learning curve. Urology 2008; 72: 1347-50
17. Duthie JB, Pickford JE, Gilling PJ,. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a 2010 update. NZ Med J 2010; 123: 1325
18. O'Brien BA, Cohen RJ, Wheeler TM, Moorin RE,. A post-radical- prostatectomy nomogram incorporating new pathological variables and interaction terms for improved prognosis. BJU Int 2010; 107: 389-95
19. Sakko AJ, Butler MS, Byers S, et al,. Immunohistochemical level of unsulfated chondroitin disaccharides in the cancer stroma is an independent predictor of prostate cancer relapse. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 2488-97
20. Samaratunga H, Yaxley J, Kerr K, McClymont K, Duffy D,. Significance of minute focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate needle biopsy. Urology 2007; 70: 299-302 (Pubitemid 47362259)
21. Quinn DI, Henshall SM, Brenner PC, et al,. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion. Cancer 2003; 97: 1884-93 (Pubitemid 36397262)
22. Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes D, Agarwal D, Costello AJ,. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: setup and procedural techniques after 150 cases. Urology 2006; 67: 364-7 (Pubitemid 43189857)
23. Sherwin JC, Mirmilstein G, Pedersen J, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, Mills J,. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors. J Urol 2010; 183: 1808-14
24. Cohen RJ, Shannon BA, Phillips M, Moorin RE, Wheeler TM, Garrett KL,. Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features. J Urol 2008; 179: 1762-7
25. Ooi K, Samali R,. Discrepancies in Gleason scoring of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and the effects of multiple needle biopsies on scoring accuracy. A regional experience in Tamworth, Australia. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 336-8 (Pubitemid 46709707)
26. Rasiah KK, Stricker PD, Haynes AM, et al,. Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 98: 2560-5 (Pubitemid 37509518)
27. Shannon BA, McNeal JE, Cohen RJ,. Transition zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a common indolent tumour type that occasionally manifests aggressive behaviour. Pathology 2003; 35: 467-71 (Pubitemid 38041280)
28. Quinn DI, Henshall SM, Haynes AM, et al,. Prognostic significance of pathologic features in localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: implications for staging systems and predictive models. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3692-705 (Pubitemid 32786282)
29. Braslis KG, Bowsher WG, Joyce G, Peters J, Costello AJ,. Evolving experience with radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 341-8 (Pubitemid 23280604)
30. Merrilees AD, Bethwaite PB, Russell GL, Robinson RG, Delahunt B,. Parameters of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens lack prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 2008; 21: 1095-100
31. Khaira HS, Bruyere F, O'Malley PJ, Peters JS, Costello AJ,. Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006; 98: 1275-8 (Pubitemid 44721241)
32. Costello AJ,. Beyond marketing: the real value of robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2005; 96: 1-2 (Pubitemid 40942855)
33. Watts R, Botti M, Beale E, Crowe H, Costello AJ,. Patient outcomes in the acute recovery phase following robotic-assisted prostate surgery: a prospective study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009; 46: 442-9
34. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13 (Pubitemid 38963009)
35. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, et al,. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 173: 1938-42 (Pubitemid 40675216)
36. Kang DC, Hardee MJ, Fesperman SF, Stoffs TL, Dahm P,. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 930-7
37. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, et al,. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2009; 57: 735-46
38. Patel VR,. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what about the evidence for open? Eur Urol 2010; 57: 941-4
39. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al,. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 475-80
40. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al,. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1037-63
41. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR,. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 2009; 104: 1428-35
42. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr,. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360-3 (Pubitemid 43189856)
43. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW,. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819-22 (Pubitemid 38596655)
44. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T,. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689-93 (Pubitemid 36443472)
45. Blute ML,. No proof of inferiority: open radical retropubic prostatectomy remains state-of-the-art surgical technique for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2009; 181: 2421-3
46. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M,: Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205-10 (Pubitemid 36966578)
47. Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A,. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005; 174: 2291-6 (Pubitemid 41611806)
48. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al,. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 785-93
49. Mulhall JP,. Defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy: challenges and misconceptions. J Urol 2009; 181: 462-71
50. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al,. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-90 (Pubitemid 350052156)
51. Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, et al,. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol 2010; 184: 2291-6