Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Early safety and efficacy

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1065-1068

  Wilson, Liam C ^a   Kennett, Katie M ^a   Gilling, Peter J ^a,b  

^a TAURANGA HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b Promed Urology Tauranga   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive; Prostate; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTINENCE; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HEMOPTYSIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM SURGERY; REOPERATION; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; SAFETY; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING;

ADULT; AGED; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEW ZEALAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10844294930     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03269.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854-7.
2. Guilloneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J. Urol. 2000; 163: 418-22.
3. Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 2000; 55: 630-4.
4. Rassweiler J, Seeman O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 1689-93.
5. Gill IS, Zippe CD. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 423-36.
6. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T et al. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 617-22.
7. Rassweiler J, Tsvian A, Kumar AVR et al. Oncological safety for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1000 operations. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 2072-5.
8. Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003; 62: 292-7.
9. Guilloneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the lessons learned. J. Endourol. 2001; 15: 441-5.
10. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 2003; 61: 699-702.
11. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O et al. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61: 386-90.
12. Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Abbou CC. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodelling and nerve preservation. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 2049-52.
13. Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG et al. Pathological comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2003; 62: 481-6.