Kinetic analysis of lesions without mass effect on breast MRI using manual and computer-assisted methods

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 893-898

  Vag, Tibor ^a   Baltzer, Pascal A T ^b   Dietzel, Matthias ^b   Zoubi, Ramy ^b   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^b   Camara, Oumar ^b   Kaiser, Werner A ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MRI; Computer aided diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Non mass

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PILOT PROJECTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79954441385     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2001-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. PJ Drew S Chatterjee LW Turnbull, et al. 1999 Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 6 599 603 10493630 10.1007/s10434-999-0599-x 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvitFeksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29428801)
2. M Kristoffersen Wiberg P Aspelin L Perbeck, et al. 2002 Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions Acta Radiol 43 275 281 12100324 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430308.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zls1CqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34729521)
3. PC Stomper S Herman DL Klippenstein, et al. 1995 Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features Radiology 197 387 395 7480682 1:STN:280: DyaK28%2Fisl2ntQ%3D%3D
4. B Boné P Aspelin L Bronge, et al. 1996 Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts Acta Radiol 37 208 213 8600964 (Pubitemid 126710106)
5. DM Ikeda NM Hylton K Kinkel, et al. 2001 Development, standardization and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies J Magn Reson Imaging 13 889 895 11382949 10.1002/jmri.1127 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3pvFeisA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32479947)
6. A Malich DR Fischer S Wurdinger, et al. 2005 Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses Am J Roentgenol 185 964 970 10.2214/AJR.04.1073
7. DR Fischer S Wurdinger J Boettcher, et al. 2005 Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: a retrospective study Invest Radiol 40 430 435 15973134 10.1097/01.rli.0000167138.52283.aa (Pubitemid 40863786)
8. WA Kaiser 2007 Breast magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques Semin Roentgenol 42 228 235 17919525 10.1053/j.ro.2007.07.003 (Pubitemid 47494510)
9. WA Berg L Gutierrez MS NessAiver, et al. 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830 849 15486214 10.1148/radiol.2333031484
10. CK Kuhl P Mielcareck S Klaschik, et al. 1999 Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211 101 110 10189459 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsFCmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29161739)
11. PA Baltzer M Benndorf M Dietzel, et al. 2010 False positive findings at contrast enhanced breast MRI. A BI-RADS descriptor study Am J Roentgenol 194 1658 1663 10.2214/AJR.09.3486
12. ML Guitterrez WB DeMartini PR Eby, et al. 2009 BI-RADS lesions characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for non-mass enhancement Am J Roentgenol 193 994 1000 10.2214/AJR.08.1983
13. PA Baltzer C Freiberg S Beger, et al. 2009 Clinical MR-mammography: are computer assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systemic approach Acad Radiol 16 1070 1076 19523854 10.1016/j.acra.2009.03.017
14. WA Kaiser E Zeitler 1989 MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA: Preliminary observations Radiology 170 681 686 2916021 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ivFehtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19062582)
15. DA Bluemke CA Gatsonis MH Chen, et al. 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy JAMA 292 2735 2742 15585733 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVGku73M (Pubitemid 39628252)
16. S Jansen X Fan G Karczmar, et al. 2008 DCEMRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and non-mass like enhancement? Med Phys 37 3102 3110 10.1118/1.2936220 (Pubitemid 351904514)
17. H Neubauer M Li R Kuehne-Heid, et al. 2003 High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement Br J Radiol 76 3 12 12595319 10.1259/bjr/14883856 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FptlKlsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36236293)
18. SA Jansen GM Newstead H Abe, et al. 2007 Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade Radiology 245 684 691 18024450 10.1148/radiol.2453062061 (Pubitemid 350127338)
19. AJ Guidi L Fischer JR Harris, et al. 1994 Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Natl Cancer Inst 86 614 619 7511693 10.1093/jnci/86.8.614 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7psVGnsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24143171)
20. R Gilles B Zafrani JM Guinebretière, et al. 1995 Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation Radiology 196 415 419 7617854 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzktlWjtw%3D%3D
21. T Pabst W Kenn WA Kaiser, et al. 2001 Understanding why contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI is not reproducible: illustration with a simple phantom Breast J 7 166 170 11469929 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007003166.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitFWqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32619777)
22. H Yabuuchi Y Matsuo T Kamitaki, et al. 2010 Non-mass like enhancement on contrast enhanced breast imaging: lesion characterization using a combination of dynamic contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted MR images Eur J Radiol 75 126 132 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.013