Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma

European Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1727-1733

  Akata, Deniz ^a   Kerimoglu, Ulku ^a   Hazirolan, Tuncay ^a   Karcaaltincaba, Musturay ^a   Köse, Faruk ^b   Özmen, Mustafa N ^a   Akhan, Okan ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Social Security Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cervix cancer; MR; Staging; Vaginal contrast

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPHADENECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSVAGINAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 23344440956     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2645-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sheu M, Chang CY, Wang JH, Yen MS (2001) Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: A reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls. Eur Radiol 11:1828-1833 10.1007/s003300000774
2. Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL (1995) Cervical carcinoma: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 86:43-50 10.1016/ 0029-7844(95)00109-5
3. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, Minami S, Noma S, Fujisawa I et al (1989) Carcinoma of the cervix: Staging with MR imaging. Radiology 171:245-251
4. Kupets R, Covens A (2001) Is the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System for Cervical Carcinoma able to predict survival in patients with cervical carcinoma? An assessment of clinimetric properties. Cancer 92:796-804 10.1002/ 1097-0142(20010815)92:4<796::AID-CNCR1385>3.0.CO;2-3
5. Sironi S, Belloni C, Taccagni GL, DelMaschio A (1991) Carcinoma of the cervix: Value of MR Imaging in detecting parametrial involvement. Am J Roentgenol 156:753-756
6. Boss EA, Barentsz JO, Massuger LFAG, Boonstra H (2000) The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 10:256-270 10.1007/ s003300050042
7. Yu KK, Hricak H, Subak LL, Zaloudek CJ, Powell CB (1998) Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: Phased array coil fast-spin echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR Imaging. Am J Roentgenol 171:707-711
8. Lien HH (1999) MR imaging of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol 40:236-245
9. Scheidler J, Heuck AF (2002) Imaging of cancer of the cervix. Radiol Clin North Am 40:577-590
10. Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Courthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, Pariziel PM, de Schepper AM (2003) The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging and clinical staging with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 13:2338-2345 10.1007/ s00330-003-1928-2
11. Van Hoe L, Vanbeckevoort D, Oyen R, Itzlinger U, Vergote I (1999) Cervical carcinoma: Optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast enhanced MR imaging: Preliminary results. Radiology 213:608-611
12. Okuna K, Joja I, Miyagi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Notohara K, Kudo T, Hiraki Y (2002) Cervical carcinoma with full thickness stromal invasion: relationship between tumor size on T2-weighted images and parametrial involvement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:119-125 10.1097/ 00004728-200201000-00018
13. deSouza NM, Whittle M, Williams AD, Sohail M, Krausz T, Gilderdale DJ, McIndoe GA, Soutter WPJ (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in stage I cervical carcinoma: A comparison of endovaginal coil with external phased array coil techniques at 0.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:1020-1026
14. Scheidler J, Reiser MF (2000) MRI of the female and male pelvis: Current and future applications of contrast enhancement. Eur J Radiol 34:220-228 10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00201-1
15. Sironi S, deCobelli F, Scarfone G et al (1993) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 188:797-801
16. Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimming R, Reiser MF (1998) Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: Evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 206:125-129
17. Tsuda K, Murakami T, Kurachi H et al (1997) MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: Comparison among T2 weighted, dynamic and post contrast T1 weighted, dynamic, and post-contrast T1 weighted images with histopathological correlation. Abdom Imaging 22:103-107 10.1007/ s002619900151
18. Hricak H (1991) Cancer of the uterus: The value of MRI pre-post irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1089-1094