Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: Comparison with the normal uterine cervix

European Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 71-78

  Naganawa, Shinji ^a   Sato, Chiho ^a   Kumada, Hisashi ^b   Ishigaki, Takeo ^a   Miura, Shunichi ^b   Takizawa, Osamu ^c  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TOYOHASHI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Cervical cancer; Cervix; Magnetic resonance; Uterine neoplasm; Uterus

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER TISSUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PATIENT MONITORING; PELVIC DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 12144258844     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Sorensen AG, Wu O, Copen WA, Davis TL, Gonzalez RG, Koroshetz WJ et al (1999) Human acute cerebral ischemia: Detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 212(3):785-792 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKrtw%3D%3D
2. Weber J, Mattle HP, Heid O, Remonda L, Schroth G (2000) Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischaemic stroke: A follow-up study. Neuroradiology 42(3):184-191 10.1007/s002340050042
3. Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 217(2):331-345 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtFertw%3D%3D
4. Chun T, Filippi CG, Zimmerman RD, Ulug AM (2000) Diffusion changes in the aging human brain. Am J Neuroradiol 21(6):1078-1083 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvosVyquw%3D%3D
5. Eastwood JD, Fiorella DJ, MacFall JF, Delong DM, Provenzale JM, Greenwood RS (2001) Increased brain apparent diffusion coefficient in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Radiology 219(2):354-358 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mt1aqtA%3D%3D
6. Kantarci K, Jack CR Jr, Xu YC, Campeau NG, O'Brien PC, Smith GE et al (2001) Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: Regional diffusivity of water. Radiology 219(1):101-107 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hslGktg%3D%3D
7. Naganawa S, Sato K, Katagiri T, Mimura T, Ishigaki T (2003) Regional ADC values of the normal brain: Differences due to age, gender, and laterality. Eur Radiol 13(1):6-11 12541104
8. Steens SC, Admiraal-Behloul F, Schaap JA, Hoogenraad FG, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, le Cessie S et al (2004) Reproducibility of brain ADC histograms. Eur Radiol 14(3):425-430 10.1007/s00330-003-2121-3
9. Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L, Wilber K (2001) Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 22(1):60-64 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7nslymsw%3D%3D
10. Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK (2000) Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 43(6):828-836 10.1002/1522-2594(200006)43:6<828::AID-MRM8>3.3.CO;2-G
11. Anderson AW, Xie J, Pizzonia J, Bronen RA, Spencer DD, Gore JC (2000) Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells. Magn Reson Imaging 18(6):689-695 10.1016/S0730-725X(00)00147-8
12. Englander SA, Ulug AM, Brem R, Glickson JD, van Zijl PC (1997) Diffusion imaging of human breast. NMR Biomed 10(7):348-352 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199710)10:7<348::AID-NBM487>3.0.CO;2-R
13. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Am J Roentgenol 170(2):397-402 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hvVSluw%3D%3D
14. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1999) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: Preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients. Abdom Imaging 24(5):456-461 10.1007/s002619900539
15. Einarsdottir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HC (2004) Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol 14(6):959-963 10.1007/s00330-004-2237-0
16. Baur A, Huber A, Arbogast S, Durr HR, Zysk S, Wendtner C et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor recurrencies and posttherapeutical soft-tissue changes in humans. Eur Radiol 11(5):828-833 10.1007/s003300000761
17. Baysal T, Bulut T, Gokirmak M, Kalkan S, Dusak A, Dogan M (2004) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of pleural fluid: Differentiation of transudative vs. exudative pleural effusions. Eur Radiol 14(5):890-896 10.1007/s00330-003-1995-4
18. Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA (2001) A generalized approach to parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 28(8):1629-1643 10.1118/1.1386778
19. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Cauteren M (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal supression (DWIBS): Technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22(4):275-282 15468951
20. Moteki T, Horikoshi H, Endo K (2002) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in endometrial and other pelvic cysts. Magn Reson Imaging 20(6):463-470 10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00524-6
21. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205-216 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
22. Hein PA, Eskey CJ, Dunn JF, Hug EB (2004) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: Tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. Am J Neuroradiol 25(2):201-209 14970018
23. Hein PA, Kremser C, Judmaier W, Griebel J, Pfeiffer KP, Kreczy A et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring diffusion changes in rectal carcinoma during combined, preoperative chemoradiation: Preliminary results of a prospective study. Eur J Radiol 45(3):214-222 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00231-0
24. Boss EA, Barentsz JO, Massuger LF, Boonstra H (2000) The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 10(2):256-270 10.1007/s003300050042
25. Fujiwara K, Yoden E, Asakawa T, Shimizu M, Hirokawa M, Oda T et al (2000) Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in early cervical cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 27(Suppl 2):576-581 10895214
26. Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E et al (2003) The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 13(10):2338-2345 10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2
27. Iwata S, Joja I, Okuno K, Miyagi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Kudo T et al (2002) Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: Efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement. Radiat Med 20(5):247-255 12450104
28. Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, Sakai K (1997) Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: Assessment with dynamic MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 168(6):1579-1585 1:STN:280:ByiA3M3ivV0%3D
29. Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Zheng J, Ehrhardt JC, Magnotta VA, Sorosky JI et al (1998) Prediction of tumor control in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of combined volume and dynamic enhancement pattern by MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 170(1):177-182 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFKrtw%3D%3D
30. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Sawada T, Miyazaki K, Okamura H (1992) Carcinoma of the cervix: Dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 182(3):643-648 1:STN:280:By2C2MbjsFY%3D
31. Yamashita Y, Baba T, Baba Y, Nishimura R, Ikeda S, Takahashi M et al (2000) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Radiology 216(3):803-809 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktValsQ%3D%3D