Predicting community structure of ground-foraging ant assemblages with Markov models of behavioral dominance

Oecologia

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 207-219

  Wittman, Sarah E ^a,b   Gotelli, Nicholas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Competition; Formicidae; Null models; Relative abundance; Species co occurrence

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANIMAL COMMUNITY; ANT; ASSAY; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COEXISTENCE; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DOMINANCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ESTIMATION METHOD; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; MARKOV CHAIN; NUMERICAL MODEL; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRADE-OFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ANT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANTS; CALIFORNIA; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; MARKOV CHAINS; OREGON; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

SISKIYOU MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 79954424736     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1813-z     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adler FR, LeBrun EG, Feener DH (2007) Maintaining diversity in an ant community: modeling, extending, and testing the dominance-discovery trade-off. Am Nat 169: 323-333.
2. Andersen AN, Patel AD (1994) Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities-an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species. Oecologia 98: 15-24.
3. Bestelmeyer BT (2000) The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. J Anim Ecol 69: 998-1009.
4. Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE, Brandao CRF, Brown WL, Delabie JHC, Silvestre R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description and evaluation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C.
5. Blüthgen N, Stork NE (2007) Ant mosaics in a tropical rainforest in Australia and elsewhere: a critical review. Austral Ecol 32: 93-104.
6. Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitía W, Jaffé K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W (2000) How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240.
7. Bolton B (2003) Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Mem Am Entomol Inst 71: 1-370.
8. Caswell H (2006) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland.
9. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1997) Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. J Anim Ecol 66: 363-374.
10. Chase JM, Leibold LA (2003) Ecological niches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31: 343-366.
12. Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150: 519-553.
13. Cody ML, Diamond JM (1975) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
14. Cole BJ (1983) Assembly of mangrove ant communities-patterns of geographical distribution. J Anim Ecol 52: 339-347.
15. Davidson DW (1997) The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol J Linn Soc 61: 153-181.
16. Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23: 484-490.
17. Davidson DW, Cook S, Snelling R (2004) Liquid feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 139: 255-266.
18. Díaz S, Cabido M, Casanoves F (1999) Functional implications of trait-environment linkages in plant communities. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 338-362.
19. Duralia TE, Reader RJ (1993) Does abundance reflect competitive ability-a field test with three prairie grasses. Oikos 68: 82-90.
20. Edgington ES (1995) Randomization Tests. Marcel Dekker, New York.
21. Feener DH (2000) Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids? Oikos 90: 79-88.
22. Fellers JH (1987) Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68: 1466-1478.
23. Gibb H, Hochuli D (2004) Removal experiment reveals limited effects of a behaviorally dominant species on ant assemblages. Ecology 85: 648-657.
24. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606-2621.
25. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2006) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7. 0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. http://www. garyentsminger. com/ecosim/ecosim. htm, Jericho, VT 05465.
26. Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
27. Griffis MR, Jaeger RG (1998) Competition leads to an extinction-prone species of salamander: interspecific territoriality in a metapopulation. Ecology 79: 2494-2502.
28. Gurevitch J, Morrow L, Wallace A, Walsh J (1992) A meta-analysis of competition field experiments. Am Nat 140: 539-572.
29. Hanski I (2008) Spatial patterns of coexistence of competing species in patchy habitat. Theor Ecol 1: 29-43.
30. Heske EJ, Brown JH, Mistry S (1994) Long-term experimental study of a Chihuahuan Desert rodent community: 13 years of competition. Ecology 75: 438-445.
31. Hill MF, Witman JD, Caswell H (2004) Markov chain analysis of succession in a rocky subtidal community. Am Nat 164: E46-E61.
32. Holway D (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80: 238-251.
33. Inouye BD (1999) Integrating nested spatial scales: implications for the coexistence of competitors on a patchy resource. J Anim Ecol 68: 150-162.
34. Ives AR (1988) Aggregation and the coexistence of competitors. Ann Zool Fenn 25: 75-88.
35. Keddy PA (1990) Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In: Grace J, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic, San Diego, pp 266-290.
36. Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci 3: 157-164.
37. King JR, Tschinkel WR (2006) Experimental evidence that the introduced fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, does not competitively suppress co-occurring ants in a disturbed habitat. J Anim Ecol 5: 1370-1378.
38. Kohler SL (1992) Competition and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecol Monogr 62: 165-188.
39. LeBrun EG (2005) Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies. Oecologia 142: 643-652.
40. LeBrun EG, Feener DH (2007) When trade-offs interact: balance of terror enforces dominance discovery trade-off in a local ant assemblage. J Anim Ecol 76: 58-64.
41. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7: 601-613.
42. Leston D (1973) The ant mosaic-tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19: 311-341.
43. Levine JM, Rees M (2002) Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization. Am Nat 160: 452-467.
44. Majer JD (1993) Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia-its structure and influence on arthropod diversity. CAB International, Wallingford.
45. Morrison LW (1996) Community organization in a recently assembled fauna: the case of Polynesian ants. Oecologia 107: 243-256.
46. Morse DH (1974) Niche breadth as a function of social dominance. Am Nat 108: 818-830.
47. Pacala SW, Rees M (1998) Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. Am Nat 152: 729-737.
48. Palmer TM (2004) Wars of attrition: colony size determines competitive outcomes in a guild of African acacia ants. Anim Behav 68: 993-1004.
49. Palmer TM, Young TP, Stanton ML, Wenk E (2000) Short-term dynamics of an acacia ant community in Laikipia, Kenya. Oecologia 123: 425-435.
50. Parr C, Gibb H (2010) Competition and the role of dominant ants. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 77-96.
51. Parr C, Sinclair B, Andersen A, Gaston K, Chown S (2005) Constraint and competition in assemblages: a cross-continental and modeling approach for ants. Am Nat 165: 481-494.
52. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652-661.
53. Rabinowitz D, Rapp JK, Dixon PM (1984) Competitive abilities of sparse grass species-means of persistence or cause of abundance. Ecology 65: 1144-1154.
54. Race MS (1982) Competitive displacement and predation between introduced and native mud snails. Oecologia 54: 337-347.
55. Ratchford JS, Wittman SE, Jules ES, Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ, Sanders NJ (2005) The effects of fire, local environment and time on ant assemblages in fens and forests. Divers Distrib 11: 487-497.
56. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J (2003) Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect Soc 50: 151-159.
57. Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85: 359-371.
58. Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1988) A competition hierarchy among boreal ants-impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51: 135-155.
59. Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1989) Niche differentiation of ant species within territories of the wood ant Formica polyctena. Oikos 56: 3-16.
60. Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 605-611.
61. Stanton ML, Palmer TM, Young TP (2002) Competition-colonization trade-offs in a guild of African Acacia-ants. Ecol Monogr 72: 347-363.
62. Stone L, Roberts A (1990) The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85: 74-79.
63. Styrsky JD, Eubanks MD (2007) Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 274: 151-164.
64. Tanner CJ (2008) Aggressive group behaviour in the ant Formica xerophila is coordinated by direct nestmate contact. Anim Behav 76: 1335-1341.
65. Tanner CJ, Adler FR (2009) To fight or not to fight: context-dependent interspecific aggression in competing ants. Anim Behav 77: 297-305.
66. Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2-16.
67. Trewby LD, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ, Walker N, Young R, Davison J, Cheeseman C, Robertson PA, Gorman ML, McDonald RA (2008) Experimental evidence of competitive release in sympatric carnivores. Biol Lett 4: 170-172.
68. Waggoner P, Stephens G (1970) Transition probabilities for a forest. Nature 255: 1160-1161.
69. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30: 279-338.
70. Wilson E (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge.
71. Wilson JB (1990) Mechanisms of species co-existence: twelve explanations for Hutchinson's "Paradox of the plankton": evidence from New Zealand plant communities. N Z J Ecol 13: 17-42.
72. Wittman SE (2007) Ant community assembly in the Siskiyou-Klamath ecoregion. PhD dissertation, University of Vermont, Burlington.
73. Wittman SE, Sanders NJ, Ellison AM, Jules ES, Ratchford JS, Gotelli NJ (2010) Species interactions and thermal constraints on ant community structure. Oikos 119: 551-559.
74. Wootton JT (2001) Prediction in complex communities: analysis of empirically derived Markov models. Ecology 82: 580-598.
75. Yanoviak SP, Kaspari M (2000) Community structure and the habitat templet: ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter. Oikos 89: 259-266.