Spatial patterns of coexistence of competing species in patchy habitat

Theoretical Ecology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-43

  Hanski, Ilkka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Coexistence; Competition; Competition colonization trade off; Heterogeneous patch network; Metapopulation; Migration; Range of migration; Spatial pattern formation

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; COEXISTENCE; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CORRELATION; EXTINCTION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATION; PATCH USE; POPULATION SIZE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 40549096059     PISSN: 18741738     EISSN: 18741746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12080-007-0004-y     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bengtsson J (1991) Interspecific competition in metapopulations. In: Gilpin ME, Hanski I (eds) Metapopulation dynamics: Empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic, London, pp 219-237
2. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445-449
3. Cadotte MW (2006) Dispersal and species diversity: A meta-analysis. Am Nat 167:913-924
4. Cadotte MW, Mai DV, Jantz S, Collins MD, Keele M, Drake JA (2006) On testing the competition-colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage. Am Nat 168:704-709
5. Chase JM, Amarasekare P, Cottenie K (2005) Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 335-354
6. Cohen JE (1970) A Markov contingency table model for replicated Lotka-Volterra systems near equilibrium. Am Nat 104:547-559
7. Cohen JE (1978) Food webs and niche space. Princeton University Press, Princeton
8. Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661-696
9. Cottenie K, De Meester L (2005) Local interactions and local dispersal in a zooplankton metacommunity. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 189-212
10. Cutler AH (1998) Nested patterns of species distributions: Processes and implications. In: McKinney ML, Drake JA (eds) Biodiversity dynamics: turnover of populations, taxa, and communities. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 212-231
11. Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz JAJ (2000) The geometry of ecological interaction: Simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Etienne RS, van ter Braak CJF, Vos CC (2004) Application of stochastic patch occupancy models to real metapopulations. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam, pp 105-132
13. Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities - a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771-801
14. Hanski I (1983) Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64:493-500
15. Hanski I (1985) Single-species spatial dynamics may contribute to long-term rarity and commonness. Ecology 66:335-343
16. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New York
17. Hanski I (2001) Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88:372-381
18. Hanski I (2005) The shrinking world: Ecological consequences of habitat loss. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe
19. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam
20. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755-758
21. Hanski I, Ranta E (1983) Coexistence in a patchy environment: Three species of Daphnia in rock pools. J Anim Ecol 52:263-280
22. Hanski I, Erälahti C, Kankare M, Ovaskainen O, Sirén H (2004) Variation among migration rate of individuals maintained by landscape structure. Ecol Lett 7:958-966
23. Hastings A (1987) Can competition be detected using species co-occurrence data? Ecology 68:117-123
24. Hausdorf B, Hennig C (2007) Null model tests of clustering of species, negative co-occurrence patterns and nestedness in meta-communities. Oikos 116:818-828
25. Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) (2005) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
26. Horn HS, MacArthur RH (1972) Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53:749-752
27. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
28. Kolasa J, Romanuk TN (2005) Assembly of unequals in the unequal world of a rock pool metacommunity. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago
29. Law R, Dieckmann U (2000) A dynamical system for neighborhoods in plant communities. Ecology 81:2137-2148
30. Leibold MA, Miller TE (2004) From metapopulations to metacommunities. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam, pp 133-150
31. Levin SA (1974) Dispersion and population interactions. Am Nat 108:207-228
32. Levine JM, Murrell DJ (2003) The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Ann Rev Ecolog Evol Syst 34:549-574
33. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237-240
34. Levins R (1970) Extinction. Lect Notes Math 2:75-107
35. Levins R, Culver D (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1246-1248
36. Loreau M (2000) Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73-76
37. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York
38. Moilanen A (1999) Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology 80:1031-1043
39. Moilanen A, Smith AT, Hanski I (1998) Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. Am Nat 152:530-542
40. Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Sole RV (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442:259-264
41. Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544-557
42. Mouquet N, Hoopes MF, Amarasekare P (2005) The world is patchy and heterogeneous! Trade-off and source-sink dynamics in competitive metacommunities. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 237-262
43. Nee S, May RM (1992) Dynamics of metapopulations: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J Anim Ecol 61:37-40
44. O'Hara RB, Arjas E, Toivonen H, Hanski I (2002) Bayesian analysis of metapopulation data. Ecology 83:2408-2415
45. Ovaskainen O (2001) The quasi-stationary distribution of the stochastic logistic model. J Appl Probab 38:898-907
46. Ovaskainen O (2002a) The effective size of a metapopulation living in a heterogeneous patch network. Am Nat 160:612-628
47. Ovaskainen O (2002b) Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem. J Theor Biol 218:419-433
48. Ovaskainen O, Cornell SJ (2006) Space and stochasticity in population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12781-12786
49. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2001) Spatially structured metapopulation models: Global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theor Popul Biol 60:281-304
50. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2002) Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation. Theor Popul Biol 61:285-295
51. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2003a) Extinction threshold in metapopulation models. Ann Zool Fenn 40:81-97
52. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2003b) How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence? Theor Popul Biol 64:481-495
53. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2004a) From individual behaviour to metapopulation dynamics: Unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. Am Nat 164:364-377
54. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2004b) Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution in metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam, pp 73-104
55. Pimm SL (1982) Food webs. Chapman and Hall, London
56. Sale PF (1977) Maintenance of high diversity in coral reef fish communities. Am Nat 111:337-359
57. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240-285
58. Slatkin M (1974) Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology 55:128-134
59. Stone L (1995) Biodiversity and habitat destruction: A comparative study of model forest and coral reef ecosystems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 261:381-388
60. ter Braak CJF, Etienne RS (2003) Improved Bayesian analysis of metapopulation data with an application to a tree frog metapopulation. Ecology 84:231-241
61. ter Braak JF, Hanski I, Verboom J (1998) The incidence function approach to modeling of metapopulation dynamics. In: Bascompte J, Solé RV (eds) Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Springer, Berlin, pp 167-188
62. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65-66
63. Tilman D, Lehman CL, Yin C (1997) Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. Am Nat 149:407-435
64. Wahlberg N, Moilanen A, Hanski I (1996) Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273:1536-1538
65. Vos CC, ter Braak CJF, Nieuwenhuizen W (2000) Incidence function modelling and conservation of the tree frog Hyla arborea in The Netherlands. Ecol Bull 48:165-180