Correlation of panoramic radiographs and spiral CT scan in the preoperative assessment of intimacy of the inferior alveolar canal to impacted mandibular third molars

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 566-570

  Khan, Imran ^a   Halli, Rajshekhar ^b   Gadre, Pushkar ^c   Gadre, Kiran S ^b  

^a JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Bharati Vidyapeeth University Dental College and Hospital   (India)

^c DATTA MEGHE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

impacted teeth; inferior alveolar canal; Inferior alveolar nerve injury; neurodeficiency; spiral computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR, THIRD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TOOTH, IMPACTED;

EID: 79954422724     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182077ac4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:185-192
2. Rud J. Third molar surgery: relationship of root to mandibular canal and injuries to inferior alveolar dental nerve. Tandlaegebladet 1983;87:619-631
3. Chiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:412-420 (Pubitemid 23318922)
4. Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars: a critical review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:17-27
5. Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:15-19 (Pubitemid 17000948)
6. Waggener DT. Relationship of third molar roots to the mandibular canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1959;12:853-856
7. Feifel H, Riediger D, Gustorf-Aeckerle R. High resolution computed tomography of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Neuroradiology 1994;36:236-238 (Pubitemid 24105248)
8. Preda L, Magglo EM, Fianza AL, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:327-331 (Pubitemid 127685538)
9. Yang J, Cavalcanti MGP, Ruprecht A, et al. 2-D and 3D reconstruction of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1999;87:369-372
10. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Boetti GL, et al. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:312-318 (Pubitemid 44768954)
11. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dental Dig 1933;39:330-336
12. Howe GL, Poyton HG. Prevention of damage to the inferior dental nerve during the extraction of mandibular third molars. Br Dent J 1960;109:355-363
13. Smith AC, Barry SE, Chiong AY. Inferior alveolar nerve damage following removal of mandibular third molar teeth - a prospective study using panoramic radiography. Aus Dent Jour 1997;429:149-152 (Pubitemid 127513690)
14. Chandler LP, Laskin DM. Accuracy of radiographs in classification of third molar teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:656-660
15. Rood JP, Hehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injuryduring third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;28:20-25 (Pubitemid 20164666)
16. Tammisalo T, Happonen RP, Tanmisalo EH. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of the impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:85-89
17. Sewerin IP, Andreasen JO. Radiographc diagnosis. In: Andreasen Jo, Peterson J K, Laskin D M. eds. Textbook and Color Atlas of Tooth Impactions: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard, 1997:246-251
18. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Pederson S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: outcome following removal of mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:264-269 (Pubitemid 128685564)
19. Kaeppler G. Conventional cross sectional tomography evaluation of mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int 2000;31:49-56
20. Ylikontiola L, Moberg K, Hummonen S, et al. Comparison of three radiographic methods used to locate the mandibular canal in the bucco-linguo direction before bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2002;93:736-742 (Pubitemid 41124633)
21. Miller CS, Nummikoski PV, Barnett DA, et al. Cross sectional tomography: a diagnostic technique for determining the buccolinguo relationship of impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:791-797