Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 327-331

  Preda, L ^a,b   Di Maggio, E M ^a   Dore, R ^a   La Fianza, A ^a   Solcia, M ^a   Schifino, M R ^a   Campani, R ^a   Preda, E G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Dental implantation; Image processing; Tomography; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031261437     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600290     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Williams MYA, Mealey BL, Hallmon WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 373-380.
2. Truitt HP, James RJ, Altman A, Boyne P. Use of computer tomography in subperiosteal implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 474-477.
3. Schwartz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, Rhodes M. Computed Tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33: 555-597.
4. Casselman JW, Deryckere F, Hermans R et al. Dental Scan: CT software program used in the anatomical evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1991; 155: 4-10.
5. Villari N, Fanfani F. Apporto diagnostico della TC nell' implantologia: utilizzazione di un nuovo programma di ricostruzione Dental Scan. Radiol Med 1992; 83: 608-614.
6. Delbalso AM, Greiner FG, Licata M. Role of diagnostic Imaging in evaluation of the dental implant patient. Radio-Graphics 1994; 14: 699-719.
7. Hirschfelder V, Hirschfelder H, Regn J. Dental CT: a new diagnostic tool in dental radiology based on double spiral CT. Advances in CT III, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1994, pp 163-171.
8. Schmuth GPF, Freisfeld M, Koester O, Schuller H. The application of computerized tomography (CT) in cases of impacted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 296-301.
9. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Absorbed doses from Computed Tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 13-17.
10. Clark D, Danforth R, Barnes R, Burtch M. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intraoral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990; 16: 156-164.
11. Rigauts H, Marchal G, Baert AL, Hupke R. Spiral scanning: phantom studies and patient material. In: Fuchs WA (ed). Advanced in CT. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1990, pp 65-76.
12. Kasales CJ, Hopper KD, Ariola DN et al. Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvements in z-Axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped CT scans. AJR 1995; 164: 1281-1284.
13. Brink JA. Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 825-841.