Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars

Quintessence International

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-56

  Kaeppler, Gabriele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conventional tomography; Impacted mandibular third molar; Mandibular nerve; Scanora

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CARCINOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INNERVATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE TUMOR; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; CARCINOMA; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NEOPLASMS; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MOLAR, THIRD; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY; TOOTH ROOT; TOOTH, IMPACTED;

EID: 0033764625     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Misch CE, Crawford EA. Predictable mandibular nerve location - A clinical zone of safety. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;7:37-40.
2. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;28:20-25.
3. Azaz B, Shteyer A, Piamenta M. Radiographic and clinical manifestations of the impacted mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Surg 1976;5:153-160.
4. Asanami S, Kasazaki Y. Expert Third Molar Extractions. Tokyo: Quintessence, 1990.
5. Reuter I. Röntgendiagnostik des unteren Weisheitszahnes. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993;48:94-99.
6. Sewerin IP. Radiology in the management of impacted teeth. Int Dent J 1987;37:25-30.
7. Tammisalo T, Happonen RP, Tammisalo EH. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of impacted third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:85-89.
8. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: Diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27:255-263.
9. Miller CS, Nummikoski PV, Barnett DA, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional tomography. A diagnostic technique for determining the buccolingual relationship of impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70: 791-797.
10. Hallikainen D, Iizuka T, Lindqvist C. Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1269-1273.
11. Kaeppler G, Meyle J, Wörner H. Darstellung der Beziehung von Mandibularkanal zu tief verlagerten Weisheitszähnen mit Hilfe der Spiraltomographie (Scanora). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1995;50:613-616.
12. Feifel H, Riediger D, Gustorf-Aeckerle R, Claus C. Die hochauflösende Computertomographie in der Diagnostik verlagerter unterer Weisheitszähne unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Strahlenbelastung. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1991;15:226-231.
13. Abrahams JJ, Kalyanpur A. Dental implants and dental CT software programs. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995;16: 468-486.
14. Korth O, Wiltfang J, Schlegel A. Indication for performing a dental-CT for determining the relationship between n. alv. inf. and the lower third molar [abstract]. 5th European Congress on Dental and Maxillo-Facial Radiology and 30th Annual Meeting of Working Group for Dental Radiology in the German Scientific Society for Dentistry, Cologne, Germany, 8-11 November 1995.
15. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-332.
16. Ulm C, Pechmann U, Ertl L, Gruber H, Solar P, Matejka M. Anatomische Untersuchungen an der atrophen Mandibula. Part 1. Die Lage des Canalis mandibulae im atrophen Unterkiefer. Z Stomatol 1989;86:491-503.
17. Torres JH, Nomdedeu H, Leboucq N. Localisation due canal mandibulaire: Comparaison experimentale de quatre types d'examen radiologique. Actual Odontostomatol Paris 1992;45:191-198.
18. Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Implant radiology. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:645-668.
19. Lindh C, Petersson A. Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: A comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:249-253.
20. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:90-97.
21. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:96-103.
22. Kaeppler G. Digitale Röntgentechniken im Zahn- und Kieferbereich-eine Übersicht. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:194-205.
23. Anderson LC, Kosinski TF, Mentag PJ. A review of the intraosseous course of the nerves of the mandible. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:394-403.
24. Jung H. Strahlenrisiken. In: Ewen K (ed). Moderne Bildgebung. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1998:24-44.
25. Kassebaum DK, Stoller NE, McDavid WD, Goshorn B, Ahrens CR. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:502-509.
26. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:156-164.
27. Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: Control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988; 167:565-569.
28. Kaeppler G. Localization of the mandibular nerve and the impacted lower third molar on transversal tomograms. In: Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Ruprecht A, Gibbs SJ (eds). Advances in Maxillofacial Imaging. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series (ICS) 1143. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 1997:189-196.