Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: Outcome following removal of mandibular third molars

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 264-269

  Wenzel, A ^a   Aagaard, E ^a   Sindet Pedersen, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Molar, third; Postoperative complications; Radiography, dental

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MOLAR, THIRD; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH, IMPACTED; TOOTH, UNERUPTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032151985     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600358     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wenzel A, Verdonschot EH. Some considerations in the evaluation of diasnostic tests in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 179-182.
2. Kraemer HC. Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, USA, 1992.
3. R multimodal radiography. A preliminary description. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 9-15.
4. Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl HG. A multimodal unit for comprehensive dentomaxillofacial radiography. Dent Update 1993; 20: 436-440.
5. Tammisalo T, Happonen R-P, Tammisalo EH. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 21: 85-89.
6. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique; diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998; 27: 255-263.
7. van Cool AV, Ten Bosch JJ, Boering G. Clinical consequences of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Surg 1977; 6: 29-37.
8. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss Jr WW. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. JADA 1980; 100: 185-192.
9. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patient and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. JADA 1980; 101: 240-245.
10. Nordenram Å. Postoperative complications in oral surgery. A study of cases treated during 1980. Swed Dent J 1983; 7: 109-113.
11. Rud J. Third molar surgery: relationship of root to mandibular canal and injuries to inferior dental nerve. Dan Dent J 1983; 87: 619-631.
12. Osborn TP, Frederickson Jr G, Small IA, Torgerson TS. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 767-769.
13. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy Jr ED. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44: 855-859.
14. Rood JP, Nooraldeen Shehab BAA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28: 20-25.
15. Carmichael FA, McGowan DA. Incidence of nerve damages following third molar removal: a west of Scotland oral surgery research group study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 78-82.
16. Chiapasco M, Crescentini M, Romanoni G. Germectomy or delayed removal of mandibular impacted third molars: the relationship between ace and incidence of complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53: 418-422.
17. de Boer MPJ, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G. Complications after mandibular third molar extraction. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 779-784.
18. Smith AC, Barry SE, Chiong AY et al. Inferior alveolar nerve damage following removal of mandibular third molar teeth. A prospective study using panoramic radiography. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 149-152.
19. Berge TI, Gilhuus-Moe OT. Per- and post-operative variables of mandibular third-molar surgery by four general practitioners and one oral surgeon. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 389-397.
20. Ten Bosch JJ, van Gool AV. The interrelation of postoperative complaints after removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Surg 1977; 6: 22-28.
21. Lysell L, Brehmer B, Knutsson K, Rohlin M. Rating the preventive indication for mandibular third-molar surgery. The appropriateness of the visual analogue scale. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 60-64.
22. Dula K, Mini R, Lambrecht JT et al. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 123-129.
23. Frederiksen ML, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 123-127.
24. Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K., Ekholm S, Johansson PE, Gröndahl HG. Low-dose tomographic techniques for dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 650-659.
25. R technique compared with hypocycloidal tomoaraphy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 65-69.