Cell adhesion to borate glasses by colloidal probe microscopy

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2256-2263

  Wiederhorn, Sheldon M ^a   Chae, Young Hun ^a   Simon Jr , Carl G ^b   Cahn, Jackson ^a   Deng, Yan ^a   Day, Delbert ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c University of Missouri Rolla   (United States)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Bioactive glass; Borate glasses; Cell adhesion; Colloidal probe microscopy

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVE GLASS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CELL ADHESION; CELLS; PROBES; SILICATES; SURFACE REACTIONS;

ADHESIVE FORCE; ATOMIC-FORCE-MICROSCOPY; BORATE GLASS; CELL ATTACHMENTS; CELLS ADHESION; COLLOIDAL PROBE MICROSCOPY; COLLOIDAL PROBES; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; PROBE MICROSCOPY; SILICATE GLASS;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;

BORIC ACID; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; GLASS; INTEGRIN; SILICATE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MEMBRANE; COLLOID; DIFFUSION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 79953872126     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hench LL. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1998;81:705.
2. Garcia AJ, Ducheyne P, Boettiger D. Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:48.
3. Day DE, White JE, Brown RF, McMenamin KD. Transformation of borate glasses into biologically useful materials. Glass Technol 2003;44:75.
4. Conzone SD, Hemrick JG, Day DE. Glass formation and chemical durability of dysprosium lithium borate glasses intended for in-vivo radiation synovectomy. Glass Tech Berichte 2001;74:35.
5. Han X, Day DE. Reaction of sodium calcium borate glass to form hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:1837.
6. Huang W, Day DE, Kittiratanapiboon K, Rahaman MN. Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:583.
7. Huang W, Rahaman MN, Day DE, Li Y. Mechanisms for converting bioactive silicate, borate and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. Eur J Glass Sci Technol B Phys Chem Glasses 2006;47:647.
8. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomater 2000;21:667.
9. ASTM. F 2664-07: Standard Guide for Assessing the Attachment of Cells to Biomaterial Surfaces by Physical Methods. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
10. Ducker WA, Senden TJ, Pashley RM. Direct measurement of colloidal forces using an atomic force microscope. Nature 1991;353:239.
11. Ducker WA, Senden TJ, Pashley RM. Measurement of forces in liquids using a force microscope. Langmuir 1992;8:1831.
12. Butt H-J. Measuring electrostatic, van der Waals, and hydration forces in electrolyte solutions with an atomic force microscope. Biophys J 1991;60:1438.
13. Kappl M, Butt H-J. The colloidal probe technique and its application to adhesion force measurements. Part Syst Charact 2002;19:129.
14. Benoit M. Cell adhesion measured by force spectroscopy on living cells. Methods Cell Biol 2002;68:91.
15. Benoit M, Gaub HE. Measuring cell adhesion forces with the atomic force microscope at the molecular level. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;172:174.
16. Sudo H, Kodama H-A, Magai Y, Yamamoto S, Kasai S. In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J Cell Biol 1983;96:191.
17. Simon Jr CG, Wight SA, Khatri CA, Wang FW. Preliminary report on the biocompatibility of a moldable, resorbable composite bone graft consisting of calcium phosphate cement, poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. J Orthoped Res 2002;20:473.
18. McNamee CE, Pyo N, Tanaka S, Vakarelski IU, Kanda Y, Higashitani K. Parameters affecting the adhesion strength between a living cell and a colloid probe when measured by the atomic force microscope. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2006;48:176.
19. Pyo N, Tanaka S, McNamee CE, Kanda Y, Fukumin Y, Ichidawa H, et al. Effect of cell type and cell density on the binding of living cells to a silica partile: an atomic force microscope study. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2006;53:278.
20. Galant ND, Michael KE, Garcia AJ. Cell adhesion strengthening: contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding and focal adhesion assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:4329.
21. Mendenhall W, Sincich T. In: Statistics for engineering and the sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1995. p. 727-32.
22. McNamee CE, Pyo N, Higashitani K. Atomic force microscopy study of the specific adhesion between a colloid particle and a living melanoma cell: effect of the charge and the hydrophobicity of the particle surface. Biophys J 2008;91:1960.
23. Ducheyne P. Bioceramics-material characteristics versus in vivo behavior. J Biomed Mat Res 1987;21:219 (A2).
24. Hench LL. Bioceramics-from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487.
25. Doremus RH. Chemical durability of glass. In: Tomozawa M, Doremus RH, editors. Treatise on materials science and technology, vol. 17. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1979. p. 41-69.
26. Garcia AJ, Gallant ND. Stick and grip. Cell Biochem Biophys 2003;39:61.
27. Garcia AJ. Get a grip: integrins in cell-biomaterial interactions. Biomaterials 2005;26:7525.
28. Bigerelle M, Anselme K. A kinetic approach to osteoblast adhesion on biomaterial surface. J Biomed Mater Res 2005;75A:530.
29. Pierres A, Benoliel AM, Bongrand P. Cell fitting to adhesive surfaces: a prerequisite to firm attachment and subsequent events. Eur Cells Mater 2002;3:31.
30. Murphy-Ullrich JE. The de-adhesive activity of matricellular proteins: is intermediate cell adhesion an adaptive state? J Clin Invest 2001;107:785.
31. Brochard-Wyart F, de Gennes PG. Adhesion induced by mobile binders: dynamics. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7854.
32. Singer SJ, Nicolson GL. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 1972;175:720.
33. Vereb G, Szöll}os J, Matkó J, Nagy P, Farkas T, Vígh L, et al. Dynamic, yet structured: the cell membrane three decades after the Singer-Nicolson model. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2003;100:8053.
34. Grzybowski BA, Bishop KJM, Campbell CJ, Fialkowski M, Smoukov SK. Microand nanotechnology via reaction-diffusion. Soft Matter 2005;1:114.
35. Boulbitch A, Guttenberg Z, Sackmann E. Kinetics of membrane adhesion mediated by ligand-receptor interaction studied with a biomemetic system. Biophysical Journal 2001;81:2743.
36. Garcia AJ, Ducheyne P, Boettiger D. Cell adhesion strength increases linearly with adsorbed fibronectin surface density. Tissue Eng 1997;3:197.
37. Xiao Y, Truskey GA. Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion. Biophys J 1996;71:2868.
38. Garcia AJ, Ducheyne P, Boettiger D. Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disk device and application to surface-reactive materials. Biomater 1997;18:1091.
39. Hertz H. On the contact of elastic solids. J Reine Angew Math 1881;92:156
40. (Translated and preprinted in English in Hertz's Miscellaneous Papers, Macmillan & Co., London, 1896, Ch. 5)..
41. Fischer-Cripps AC. In: Introduction to contact mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000. Chap. 6.