Cell adhesion strength increases linearly with adsorbed fibronectin surface density

Tissue Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 197-206

  Garcia, Andres J ^a,b   Ducheyne, Paul ^a   Boettiger, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; FIBRONECTIN; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH;

EID: 0030912681     PISSN: 10763279     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.1997.3.197     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ruoslahti, E., and Pierschbacher, M.D. New perspectives in cell adhesion: ROD and integrins. Science 238, 491, 1987.
2. Hynes, R.O. Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69, 11, 1992.
3. Shattil, S.J., Ginsberg, M.H., and Brugge, J.S. Adhesive signaling in platelets. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 695, 1994.
4. DeSimone, D.W. Adhesion and matrix in vertebrate development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 747, 1994.
5. Schwartz, M.A., and Ingber, D.E. Integrating with integrins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 5, 389, 1994.
6. Juliano, R.L., and Varner, J.A. Adhesion molecules in cancer: The role of integrins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 812, 1993.
7. Park, P.K., Jarrell, B.E., Williams, S.K., Carter, T.L., Rose, D.G., Martinez-Hernandez, A., and Carabasi, R.A., 3d. Thrombus-free, human endothelial surface in the midregion of a Dacron vascular graft in the splanchnic venous circuit - Observations after nine months of implantation. J. Vase. Surg. 11, 468, 1990.
8. Sharma, S.K., and Mahendroo, P.P. Affinity chromatography of cells and cell membranes. J. Chromatogr. 184, 471, 1980.
9. Langer, R., and Vacanti, J.P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920, 1993.
10. Moghimi, S.M., Illum, L., and Davis, S.S. Physiopathological and physicochemical considerations in targeting of colloids and drug carriers to the bone marrow. Crit. Rev. Therapeut. Drug Carrier Syst. 7, 187, 1990.
11. Evans, E., Berk, D., Leung, A., and Mohandas, N. Detachment of aggutin-bonded red blood cells: I. Forces to rupture-point attachments. Biophys. J. 59, 838, 1991.
12. Lotz, M.M., Burdsal, C.A., Erickson, H.P., and McClay, D.R. Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: Quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response. J. Cell. Biol. 109, 1795, 1989.
13. Weiss, L. The measurement of cell adhesion. Exp. Cell. Res. 8, 141, 1961.
14. Doroszewski, J., Skierski, J., and Przadka, L. Interaction of neoplastic cells with glass surface under flow conditions. Exp. Cell. Res. 104, 335, 1977.
15. Horbett, T.A., Waldburger, J.J., Ratner, B.D., and Hoffman, A.S. Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic- hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22, 383, 1988.
16. Pratt, K.J., Williams, S.K., and Jarrell, B.E. Enhanced adherence of human adult endothelial cells to plasma discharge modified polyethylene terephthalate. J. Biomed. Mater Res. 23, 1131, 1989.
17. Truskey, G.A., and Pirone, J.S. The effect of fluid shear stress upon cell adhesion to fibronectin-treated surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24, 1333, 1990.
18. García, A.J., Ducheyne, P., and Boettiger, D. Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disk device and application to surface-reactive materials. Biomaterials (in press).
19. Majeska, R.J., Port, M., and Einhorn, T.A. Attachment to extracellular matrix molecules by cells differing in the expression of osteoblastic traits. J. Bone Miner. Res. 8, 277, 1993.
20. Leckband, D., Muller, W., Schmitt, F.-J., and Ringsdorf, H. Molecular mechanisms determining the strength of receptor-mediated intermembrane adhesion. Biophys. J. 69, 1162, 1995.
21. Bell, G.I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618, 1978.
22. Mohandas, N., Hockmuth, R.M., and Spaeth, E.F. Adhesion of red cells to foreign surfaces in the presence of flow. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 8, 119, 1974.
23. Iuliano, D.J., Saavedra, S.S., and Truskey, G.A. Effect of the conformation and orientation of adsorbed fibronectin on endothelial cell spreading and the strength of adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27, 1103, 1993.
24. Hammer, D.A., and Lauffenburger, D.A. A dynamical model for receptor-mediated cell adhesion to surfaces. Biophys. J. 52, 475, 1987.
25. Cozens-Roberts, C., Lauffenburger, D.A., and Quinn, J.A. Receptor-mediated cell attachment and detachment kinetics. I. Probabilistic model and analysis. Biophys. J. 58, 841, 1990.
26. Cozens-Roberts, C., Quinn, J.A., and Lauffenburger, D.A. Receptor-mediated cell attachment and detachment kinetics. II. Experimental model studies with the radial-flow detachment assay. Biophys. J. 58, 857, 1990.
27. Kuo, S.C., and Lauffenburger, D.A. Relationship between receptor/ligand binding affinity and adhesion strength. Biophys. J. 65, 2191, 1993.
28. Truskey, G.A., Burmeister, J.S., Grapa, E., and Reichert, W.M. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) II. Topological mapping of relative cell/substrate separation distances. J. Cell. Sci. 103, 491, 1992.
29. Saterbak, A., Kuo, S.C., and Lauffenburger, D.A. Heterogeneity and probabilistic binding contributions to receptor-mediated cell detachment kinetics. Biophys. J. 65, 243, 1993.