Application of an artificial neural network to predict postinduction hypotension during general anesthesia

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 308-314

  Lin, Chao Shun ^a,b   Chang, Chuen Chau ^b   Chiu, Jainn Shiun ^d   Lee, Yuan Wen ^b   Lin, Jui An ^b   Mok, Martin S ^b   Chiu, Hung Wen ^c   Li, Yu Chuan ^c  

^a TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG BING SHOW CHWAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anesthesiology; Artificial neural networks; Logistic regression models; ROC curve analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MIDDLE AGED; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 79953836782     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10379648     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jain U, Laflamme CJA, Aggarwal A, et al. Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes and their association with myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:576-91. (Pubitemid 27118340)
2. Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon C, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and 1-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:4-10. (Pubitemid 40013594)
3. Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:622-8. (Pubitemid 41208481)
4. Reich DL, Bodian CA, Krol M, et al. Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89: 814-22. (Pubitemid 29458450)
5. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL. et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502-16. (Pubitemid 29254792)
6. Memtsoudis SG, Andrew HS, Heerdt PM. Autonomic mechanisms in the age-related hypotensive effect of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:111-5. (Pubitemid 40013614)
7. Penny W, Frost D. Neural networks in clinical medicine. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:386-98. (Pubitemid 26337641)
8. Patil S, Henry JW, Rubenfire M, Stein PD. Neural network in the clinical diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104:1685-9. (Pubitemid 23360091)
9. Heckerling PS, Gerber BS, Tape TG, Wigton RS. Prediction of community-acquired pneumonia using artificial neural networks. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:112-21. (Pubitemid 36373393)
10. Chiu JS, Wang YF, Su YC, Wei LH, Liao JG, Li YC. Artificial neural network to predict skeletal metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. J Med Syst. 2009;33:91-100.
11. Maglaveras N, Stamkopoulos T, Diamantaras K, Pappas C, Strintzis M. ECG pattern recognition and classification using nonlinear transformations and neural networks: a review. Int J Med Inform. 1998;52:191-208. (Pubitemid 28529655)
12. Subasi A, Erçelebi E. Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 2005;78:87-99. (Pubitemid 40575687)
13. Li YC, Liu L, Chiu WT, Jian WS. Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients. Int J Med Inform. 2000;57:1-9. (Pubitemid 30069902)
14. Lin CS, Li YC, Mok MS, Wu CC, Chiu HW, Lin YH. Neural network modelling to predict the hypnotic effect of propofol bolus induction. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;450-3.
15. Lin CS, Chiu JS, et al. Predicting hypotensive episodes during spinal anesthesia with the application of artificial neural networks. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 2008;92:193-7.
16. Lin CC, Wan YC, Chen JY, et al. Artificial neural network prediction of clozapine response with combined pharmacogenetic and clinical data. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 2008;91:91-9.
17. Lin CC, Bai YM, Chen JY, et al. Easy and low-cost identification of metabolic syndrome in patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics: artificial neural network and logistic regression models. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:225-34.
18. Miller AS, Blott BH, Hames TK. Review of neural network application in medical imaging and signal processing. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1992;30:449-64.
19. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:92-106. (Pubitemid 12205725)
20. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997;16:965-80. (Pubitemid 27198985)
21. Chen CA., Lin SH, Hsu Y J, Li YC, Wang YF, Chiu JS. Neural network modeling to stratify peritoneal membrane transporter in predialytic patients. Intern Med. 2006;45:663-4.
22. Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: A methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35:352-9. (Pubitemid 36951935)
23. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-43. (Pubitemid 13033817)
24. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making. 1984;4:137-50. (Pubitemid 14001462)
25. DeLong E, DeLong D, Clarke-Pearson D. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-45.
26. Huang CJ, Kuok CH, Kuo TB, Hsu YW, Tsai PS. Pre-operative measurement of heart rate variability predicts hypotension during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:542-8.
27. Hanss R, Renner J, Ilies C, et al. Does heart rate variability predict hypotension and bradycardia after induction of general anaesthesia in high risk cardiovascular patients? Anaesthesia. 2008;63:129-35.
28. Baxt WG. Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:843-8.
29. Baxt WG. A neural network trained to identify the presence of myocardial infarction bases some decisions on clinical associations that differ from accepted clinical teaching. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:217-22. (Pubitemid 24206346)