Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 10-24

  Daugherty, Jenny Lynn ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953708343     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v21i1.a.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
2. Bredeson, P. V. (2003). Designs for learning: A new architecture for professional development in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
3. Bybee, R. W., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Advancing technology education: The role of professional development. The Technology Teacher, 60(2) 31-34.
4. Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers' professional development: A solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 81-101.
5. Compton, V., & Jones, A. (1998). Reflecting on teacher development in technology education: Implications for future projectmes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), 151-166.
6. Craft, A. (2000). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
9. th Yearbook, Council on Technology Teacher Education (pp. 1-12). Woodland Hills, CA: Glencoe.
10. Evans, L. (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 123-137.
11. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658.
12. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
13. Gordon, S. P. (2004). Professional development for school improvement: Empowering learning communities. Boston: Pearson.
14. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
15. Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan 84, 748-750.
17. Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 150-161.
18. th Yearbook, Council on Technology Teacher Education (pp. 233-257). Woodland Hills, CA: Glencoe.
19. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA.
20. Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 37-54.
21. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Effective professional development for teachers of mathematics. In Eisenhower National Clearinghouse, Ideas that work: Mathematics professional development. Columbus, OH: Eisenhower National Clearinghouse.
22. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
23. National Research Council. (2006). Rising above the gather storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24. Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 67-96.
25. Shaha, S.H., Lewis, V.K., O'Donnell, T.J. & Brown, D.H. (2004). Evaluating professional development: An approach in verifying program impact on teachers and students. Journal of Research in Professional Learning. National Staff Development Council. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/research/shaha.pdf
26. Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2005). Why can't we get it right? Designing high- quality professional development for standards-based schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
27. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford.
28. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25-29.