Twelve tips for ethical approval for research in health professions education

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 268-272

  Egan Lee, Eileen ^a   Freitag, Sharon ^a   Leblanc, Vicki ^b   Baker, Lindsay ^a   Reeves, Scott ^a,b,c,d  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

CANADA; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS;

EID: 79953707642     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507715     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Clarridge B, Yucel R, Causino N, Blumenthal D. 2007. Characteristics of medical school faculty members serving on institutional review boards: Results of a national survey. Acad Med 78:831-836. (Pubitemid 36993087)
2. Dauphinee WD, Frecker RC. 2005. Routinely collected educational data: Challenges to ethics and to privacy. Med Educ 39:877-879. (Pubitemid 41297586)
3. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Mechaber AJ, Eacker A, Harper W, Massie FS, Poweer DV, Shanafelt TD. 2007. Medical education research and IRB review: An analysis and comparison of the IRB review process and six institutions. Acad Med 82:654-660. (Pubitemid 47013349)
4. Eva KW. 2007. The yin and yang of education research. Med Educ 41:724-725. (Pubitemid 47125334)
5. Henry RC, Wright DE. 2001. When do medical students become human subjects of research? The case of program evaluation. Acad Med 76:871-875. (Pubitemid 32881009)
6. Howe KR, Dougherty KC. 2005. Ethics, institutional review boards, and the changing face of educational research. Educ Res 22:16-21.
7. Lawrence DJ. 2007. The ethics of educational research. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 30:326-330. (Pubitemid 46726646)
8. Mavis BE, Henry RC. 2005. Being uniformed on informed consent: A pilot survey of medical education faculty. BMC Med Educ 5:12.
9. Morrison J, Prideaux D. 2001. Ethics approval for research in medical education. Med Educ 35:1008. (Pubitemid 33036060)
10. National Patient Safety Agency, 2009. Is your project research? [Retrieved 2010 April 27] from the National Patient Safety Agency website, United Kingdom: Available from: http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/applications/ apply/is-your-project-research/.
11. Office for Human Research Protection, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. International Compilation of Human Research Protections (2010 edition) [Retrieved 2010 April 26] from the US Department of Health and Human Services website. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/ HSPCompilation.pdf.
12. Prideaux D, Rogers W. 2006. Audit or research: The ethics of publication. Med Educ 40:497-499. (Pubitemid 43742820)
13. Pugsley L, Dornan T. 2007. Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut: Clinical ethics review and medical education research projects. Med Educ 41:726-728. (Pubitemid 47125333)
14. Tomkowiak JM, Gunderson AJ. 2004. To IRB or not to IRB? Acad Med 79:628-632. (Pubitemid 38879063)
15. Wagner RM. 2003. Ethical review of research involving human subjects: When and why is IRB review necessary? Muscle Nerve 28:27-39. (Pubitemid 36775956)
16. Wilson DJ. 2008. The risk-benefit conundrum in education research. Med Educ 42:323.