Being uninformed on informed consent: A pilot survey of medical education faculty

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Mavis, Brian E ^a   Henry, Rebecca C ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; POLICY; QUESTIONNAIRE; AWARENESS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

AWARENESS; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 21544483480     PISSN: 14726920     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-12     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Tomkowiak JM, Gunderson AJ: To IRB or not to IRB? Acad Med 2004, 79:628-632.
2. Morrison J, Prideaux D: Ethics approval for research in medical education. Med Educ 2001, 35:1008.
3. DuBois JM: When is informed consent appropriate in educational research? Regulatory and ethical issues. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 2002, 24:1-8.
4. Roberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, Nguyen K, Warner TD: An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Acad Med 2001, 76:876-885.
5. Borror K: Human research subject protections under federalwide assurance (FWA) 1666 activities involving the Graduation Questionnaire (GQ). [http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/detrm_letrs/YR04/aug04a.pdf].
6. Protection of Human Subjects, 56 Federal Register 28003 (1991) [codified at 45 CFR 46]. United States. .
7. Casarett D, Karlawish JHT, Sugarman J: Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: Proposed criteria and potential implications. JAMA 2000, 283(17):2275-2280.
8. Christakis N: Do medical student research subjects need special protection? IRB: Ethics and Human Research 1985, 7:1-4.
9. Henry RC, Wright DE: When do medical students become human subjects of research? The case of program evaluation. Acad Med 2001, 76:871-875.
10. Boyer E: Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate Princeton NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
11. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP); Department of Health and Human Services [http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/]
12. Institutional Review Board Decision Tree [http://www.irb.ari zona.edu/decisiontree/index.htm]. University of Arizona